The impact of intrauterine devices on subsequent fertility

被引:12
作者
Skjeldestad, Finn E. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Technol, SINTEF Hlth Res, N-7465 Trondheim, Norway
[2] Norwegian Univ Technol, Inst Lab Med Childrens & Womens Hlth, N-7465 Trondheim, Norway
关键词
fertility; infertility; intrauterine contraceptive devices; pregnancy outcome;
D O I
10.1097/GCO.0b013e3282fe7427
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Purpose of review To investigate the impact of intrauterine devices on subsequent fertility. Recent findings Intrauterine devices are safe, well tolerated and used by millions of women worldwide. Subsequent fertility is studied among women who remove the intrauterine contraceptive device for planning pregnancy or among women who have removed the intrauterine contraceptive device because of intrauterine contraceptive device-related complications and later on have become pregnant. Study participants are recruited from randomized clinical trials on intrauterine contraceptive device performance or in case series among women who remove the intrauterine contraceptive device. Pregnancy rates after removal are high and are similar to time-to-pregnancy rates in the general population. The birth rates are high with a normal distribution of preterm deliveries, normal birth weight and sex ratio of newborns. The ratio of extra-intrauterine pregnancies and the need for infertility work up are low, and the distribution of infertility causes among fully investigated couples is as seen in the general population. Summary Despite small sample size of studies investigating impact of intrauterine contraceptive devices on subsequent fertility, the results are consistent and reassuring on high pregnancy rates, and a normal distribution of pregnancy outcomes. There are limited data on return of fertility after usage of medicated intrauterine contraceptive devices more studies are warranted among women who have used hormone-releasing intrauterine contraceptive devices.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 280
页数:6
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Maternal age and fetal loss: population based register Linkage study [J].
Andersen, AMN ;
Wohlfahrt, J ;
Christens, P ;
Olsen, J ;
Melbye, M .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 320 (7251) :1708-1712
[2]   LEVONORGESTREL-RELEASING AND COPPER-RELEASING (NOVA T) IUDS DURING 5 YEARS OF USE - A RANDOMIZED COMPARATIVE TRIAL [J].
ANDERSSON, K ;
ODLIND, V ;
RYBO, G .
CONTRACEPTION, 1994, 49 (01) :56-72
[3]   RETURN TO FERTILITY AFTER REMOVAL OF A LEVONORGESTREL-RELEASING INTRAUTERINE-DEVICE AND NOVA-T [J].
ANDERSSON, K ;
BATAR, I ;
RYBO, G .
CONTRACEPTION, 1992, 46 (06) :575-584
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2004, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD001776.PUB2
[6]   Time trends in ectopic pregnancies in a Norwegian County 1970-2004 - a population-based study [J].
Bakken, I. J. ;
Skjeldestad, F. E. .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2006, 21 (12) :3132-3136
[7]   RECOVERY OF FERTILITY AFTER USE OF THE LEVONORGESTREL 20 MCG/D OR COPPER T-380 AG INTRAUTERINE-DEVICE [J].
BELHADJ, H ;
SIVIN, I ;
DIAZ, S ;
PAVEZ, M ;
TEJADA, AS ;
BRACHE, V ;
ALVAREZ, F ;
SHOUPE, D ;
BREAUX, H ;
MISHELL, DR ;
MCCARTHY, T ;
YO, V .
CONTRACEPTION, 1986, 34 (03) :261-267
[8]  
BRATT H, 1998, ACTA OBSTET GYNECOL, V67, P147
[9]  
BURKMAN RT, 1981, OBSTET GYNECOL, V57, P269
[10]   TUBAL INFERTILITY AND THE INTRAUTERINE-DEVICE [J].
CRAMER, DW ;
SCHIFF, I ;
SCHOENBAUM, SC ;
GIBSON, M ;
BELISLE, S ;
ALBRECHT, B ;
STILLMAN, RJ ;
BERGER, MJ ;
WILSON, E ;
STADEL, BV ;
SEIBEL, M .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1985, 312 (15) :941-947