The Effect of Bone Density Measured by Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Implant Dimensions on the Stability of Dental Implants

被引:13
作者
Noaman, Ali Tareef [1 ]
Bede, Salwan Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Baghdad, Coll Dent, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Baghdad, Iraq
关键词
Bone density; CBCT; implant stability; insertion torque; resonance frequency analysis; RESONANCE FREQUENCY-ANALYSIS; SECONDARY STABILITY; INSERTION TORQUE; VALUES; DIAMETER; LENGTH;
D O I
10.1097/SCS.0000000000008429
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of bone density value in Hounsfield unit derived from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), and implant dimensions in relation to implant stability parameters namely the resonance frequency analysis and the insertion torque (IT) value. It included 24 patients who received 42 dental implants (DI). The bone density of the planned implant site was preoperatively measured using cone beam computed tomography. The implant stability was measured using Osstell implant stability quotient (ISQ). The ISQ values were recorded immediately postoperatively and after 16 weeks. The IT value was categorized as 35 N/cm or > 35 N/cm. The mean (standard deviation) primary stability was 79.58 (5.27) ISQ, which was significantly higher than the secondary stability 74.31 (6.34) ISQ (P < 0.0001). There was a significant moderate positive correlation of bone density with primary stability (r = 0.4, P = 0.0099) and no correlation with secondary stability (r = 0.003, P = 0.9867). The bone density of DI with 35 N/cm IT was significantly lower than with > 35 N/cm IT (P = 0.0390). Better stability was recorded with wider implants. Whereas the length of the DI showed a nonsignificant correlation with primary and secondary stability (P = 0.7633 and 0.4670, respectively). The DI dimensions showed a nonsignificant correlation with the IT. Cone beam computed tomography may be considered as a reliable method to assess bone density and predict the implant stability. The diameter of DI affected the implant stability favorably, whereas DI length showed no effect.
引用
收藏
页码:E553 / E557
页数:5
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Can the Bone Density Estimated by CBCT Predict the Primary Stability of Dental Implants? A New Measurement Protocol [J].
Al-Jamal, Mustafa Faisal J. ;
Al-Jumaily, Hassanien A. .
JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 32 (02) :E171-E174
[2]   Methods to Improve Osseointegration of Dental Implants in Low Quality (Type-IV) Bone: An Overview [J].
Alghamdi, Hamdan S. .
JOURNAL OF FUNCTIONAL BIOMATERIALS, 2018, 9 (01)
[3]  
Andersson P., 2008, Appl Osseointegration Res, V6, P23
[4]  
Fuster-Torres MA, 2011, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V26, P1051
[5]  
Atsumi M, 2007, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V22, P743
[6]   How Accurate Is CBCT in Measuring Bone Density? A Comparative CBCT-CT In Vitro Study [J].
Cassetta, Michele ;
Stefanelli, Luigi Vito ;
Pacifici, Andrea ;
Pacifici, Luciano ;
Barbato, Ersilia .
CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2014, 16 (04) :471-478
[7]   Relation between bone density and primary implant stability [J].
Farre-Pages, Nuria ;
Auge-Castro, Ma Luisa ;
Alaejos-Algarra, Fernando ;
Mareque-Bueno, Javier ;
Ferres-Padro, Eduard ;
Hernandez-Alfaro, Federico .
MEDICINA ORAL PATOLOGIA ORAL Y CIRUGIA BUCAL, 2011, 16 (01) :E62-E67
[8]   Does Length, Diameter, or Bone Quality Affect Primary and Secondary Stability in Self-Tapping Dental Implants? [J].
Gomez-Polo, Miguel ;
Ortega, Rocio ;
Gomez-Polo, Cristina ;
Martin, Cristina ;
Celemin, Alicia ;
del Rio, Jaime .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2016, 74 (07) :1344-1353
[9]   Correlation of cone beam CT-derived bone density parameters with primary implant stability assessed by peak insertion torque and periotest in the maxilla [J].
Hakim, Samer G. ;
Glanz, Julia ;
Ofer, Markus ;
Steller, Daniel ;
Sieg, Peter .
JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 47 (03) :461-467
[10]   Quantitative biomechanical analysis of the influence of the cortical bone and implant length on primary stability [J].
Hong, Jongrak ;
Lim, Young-Jun ;
Park, Sang-Oh .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2012, 23 (10) :1193-1197