Life-cycle assessment of two sewage sludge-to-energy systems based on different sewage sludge characteristics: Energy balance and greenhouse gas-emission footprint analysis

被引:40
作者
Chen, Renjie [1 ]
Yuan, Shijie [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Sisi [1 ,2 ]
Ci, Hanlin [3 ]
Dai, Xiaohu [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Xiankai [3 ]
Li, Chong [3 ]
Wang, Dianchang [3 ]
Dong, Bin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Inst Pollut Control & Ecol Secur, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[3] China Three Gorges Corp, YANGTZE Ecoenvironm Engn Res Ctr, Beijing 100038, Peoples R China
来源
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES | 2022年 / 111卷
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Incineration; Anaerobic digestion; Energy recovery; Environmental sustainability; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; PYROLYSIS; LCA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jes.2021.04.012
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Anaerobic digestion and incineration are widely used sewage sludge (SS) treatment and dis-posal approaches to recovering energy from SS, but it is difficult to select a suitable technical process from the various technologies. In this study, life-cycle assessments were adopted to compare the energy-and greenhouse gas-(GHG) emission footprints of two sludge-to-energy systems. One system uses a combination of AD with incineration (the AI system), whereas the other was simplified by direct incineration (the DI system). Comparison be-tween three SS feedstocks (VS/TS: 57.61-73.1 ds%) revealed that the AI system consistently outperformed the DI system. The results of sensitivity analyses showed that the energy and GHG emission performances were mainly affected by VS content of the SS, AD conversion efficiency, and the energy consumption of sludge drying. Furthermore, the energy and GHG emission credit of the two systems increased remarkably with the increase in the VS content of the SS. For the high-organic-content sludge (VS/TS: 55%-80%), the energy and GHG emis-sion credit of the AI system increase with the increase of AD conversion efficiency. However, for the low organic content sludge (VS/TS: 30%-55%), it has the opposite effect. In terms of energy efficiency and GHG performance, the AI system is a good choice for the treatment of high-organic-content sludge (VS/TS > 55%), but DI shows superiority over AI when dealing with low organic content sludge (VS/TS < 55%). (c) 2021 The Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:380 / 391
页数:12
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Chemical and sewage sludge co-incineration in a full-scale MSW incinerator: toxic trace element mass balance [J].
Biganzoli, Laura ;
Grosso, Mario ;
Giugliano, Michele ;
Campolunghi, Manuel .
WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2012, 30 (10) :1081-1088
[2]  
[蔡璐 Cai Lu], 2010, [中国给水排水, China Water & Wastewater], V26, P106
[3]   Sewage sludge-to-energy approaches based on anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis: Brief overview and energy efficiency assessment [J].
Cao, Yucheng ;
Pawlowski, Artur .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2012, 16 (03) :1657-1665
[4]   Sludge-to-energy approaches based on pathways that couple pyrolysis with anaerobic digestion (thermal hydrolysis pre/post-treatment): Energy efficiency assessment and pyrolysis kinetics analysis [J].
Chen, Renjie ;
Yu, Xiaoqing ;
Dong, Bin ;
Dai, Xiaohu .
ENERGY, 2020, 190
[5]  
Chen S., J HAZARD MATER, V393
[6]   Potential of greenhouse gas emissions from sewage sludge management: a case study of Taiwan [J].
Chen, Ying-Chu ;
Kuo, Jeff .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 129 :196-201
[7]  
Commission European, 2001, DISP REC ROUT SEW 3
[8]   Fundamental behaviors in combustion of raw sewage sludge [J].
Cui, H ;
Ninomiya, Y ;
Masui, M ;
Mizukoshi, H ;
Sakano, T ;
Kanaoka, C .
ENERGY & FUELS, 2006, 20 (01) :77-83
[9]   Combined Life Cycle Environmental and Exergetic Assessment of Four Typical Sewage Sludge Treatment Techniques in China [J].
Dong, Jun ;
Chi, Yong ;
Tang, Yuanjun ;
Wang, Fei ;
Huang, Qunxing .
ENERGY & FUELS, 2014, 28 (03) :2114-2122
[10]   Hydrogen Production from Fossil Fuels: Life Cycle Assessment of Technologies with Low Greenhouse Gas Emissions [J].
Dufour, Javier ;
Serrano, David P. ;
Galvez, Jose L. ;
Moreno, Jovita ;
Gonzalez, Antonio .
ENERGY & FUELS, 2011, 25 (05) :2194-2202