Results of drug hypersensitivity evaluations in a large group of children and adults

被引:110
作者
Rubio, M. [1 ,2 ]
Bousquet, P. -J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gomes, E. [4 ]
Romano, A. [5 ,6 ]
Demoly, P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Montpellier, Hop Arnaud Villeneuve, Dept Allergy, F-34295 Montpellier 5, France
[2] Univ Hosp Montpellier, Hop Arnaud Villeneuve, INSERM, U657, F-34295 Montpellier 5, France
[3] Univ Nimes Hosp, Hop Caremeau, Dept Epidemiol Clin Biostat Sante Publ & Informat, F-30006 Nimes, France
[4] Hosp Maria Pia, Serv Imunoalergol, Oporto, Portugal
[5] UCSC Allergy Unit, Dept Internal Med & Geriatr, Rome, Italy
[6] IRCCS Oasi Maria SS, Troina, Italy
关键词
DAHD database; diagnosis; drug allergy; drug hypersensitivity; risk prediction; ALLERGY; METAANALYSIS; ANTIBIOTICS; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2222.2011.03887.x
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background Proven IgE or T-cell mediated drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) seem less common in children compared with adults. However, this has never been proved by data. Objective To determine and compare proven DHR prevalence in children and adults. Methods Using the DAHD (Drug Allergy and Hypersensitivity Database) cohort, children with proven DHRs were compared with adults. The international EAACI-ENDA recommendations were followed. Patients were divided into four groups: index reaction and test during childhood (C/C), index reaction at childhood and test at adulthood (C/A), index reactions at childhood and adulthood and test at adulthood (CA/A), index reaction and test at adulthood (A/A). Results A total of 3275 patients (67.9% female), comprising a total of 4370 patient-episodes, were evaluated (74.5% belonged to the A/A group). Prevalence of positive tests was 15.2% (95% CI, 14.1-16.2) for all tested classes, 10.6% (8.3-13.0) for C/C, 10.6% (7.5-13.6) for C/A, 22.1% (12.8-31.3) for CA/A and 16.5% (15.2-17.8) for A/A. The prevalence was lower in group C/C compared with groups A/A (P < 0.0001) and CA/A (P = 0.003). It was also lower in group C/A compared with the two latter groups (respectively P = 0.003 and P = 0.005). Significant differences were found for maculopapular exanthemas only, and not for urticaria/angioedema and anaphylaxis. The difference was mainly observed with beta-lactams and not for NSAIDs. Conclusion and Clinical Relevance Suspicions of DHRs are less likely to be confirmed in children.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 130
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Drug provocation testing in the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity reactions: general considerations [J].
Aberer, W ;
Bircher, A ;
Romano, A ;
Blanca, M ;
Campi, P ;
Fernandez, J ;
Brockow, K ;
Pichler, WJ ;
Demoly, P .
ALLERGY, 2003, 58 (09) :854-863
[2]   Task Force Report: Future research needs for the prevention and management of immune-mediated drug hypersensitivity reactions [J].
Adkinson, NF ;
Essayan, D ;
Gruchalla, R ;
Haggerty, H ;
Kawabata, T ;
Sandler, JD ;
Updyke, L ;
Shear, NH ;
Wierda, D .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2002, 109 (03) :S461-S478
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1969, World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser, V425, P5
[4]   ADVERSE EFFECTS OF ORALLY ADMINISTERED AMPICILLIN [J].
BASS, JW ;
CROWLEY, DM ;
STEELE, RW ;
YOUNG, FSH ;
HARDEN, LB .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1973, 83 (01) :106-108
[5]  
Brockow K, 2002, ALLERGY, V57, P45
[6]   The role of penicillin in benign skin rashes in childhood: A prospective study based on drug rechallenge [J].
Caubet, Jean-Christoph ;
Kaiser, Laurent ;
Lemaitre, Barbara ;
Fellay, Benoit ;
Gervaix, Alain ;
Eigenmann, Philippe A. .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2011, 127 (01) :218-222
[7]   Drug hypersensitivity: questionnaire [J].
Demoly, P ;
Kropf, R ;
Bircher, A ;
Pichler, WJ .
ALLERGY, 1999, 54 (09) :999-1003
[8]  
Gomes E., 2005, ALLERGY CLIN IMMUNOL, V17, P9
[9]   Drug allergy claims in children: from self-reporting to confirmed diagnosis [J].
Gomes, E. Rebelo ;
Fonseca, J. ;
Araujo, L. ;
Demoly, P. .
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL ALLERGY, 2008, 38 (01) :191-198
[10]   Epidemiology of hypersensitivity drug reactions [J].
Gomes, ER ;
Demoly, P .
CURRENT OPINION IN ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2005, 5 (04) :309-316