Complications of Gastrostomy Tubes in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer

被引:3
|
作者
Vujasinovic, Miroslav [1 ,2 ]
Marsk, Elin [3 ,4 ]
Tsolakis, Apostolos, V [1 ]
Hynning, Boel [2 ]
Nordberg, Martin [5 ,6 ]
Lindblad, Mats [1 ,4 ]
Lindqvist, Catarina [2 ,7 ]
Nordenvall, Lalle H. [3 ,4 ]
Bark, Rusana [3 ,4 ]
Elbe, Peter [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Upper Abdominal Dis, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Karolinska Inst, Dept Med Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
[3] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Karolinska Inst, Dept Clin Sci Intervent & Technol CLINTEC, Stockholm, Sweden
[5] Soder Sjukhuset, Dept Surg, Stockholm, Sweden
[6] Karolinska Inst, Sodersjukhuset, Dept Clin Sci & Educ, Stockholm, Sweden
[7] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Med Unit Clin Nutr, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Enteral nutrition; open gastrostomy; percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy; head and neck cancer; PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY;
D O I
10.1002/lary.30017
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Objectives Head and neck cancers (HNCs) include various malignant tumors of the upper aerodigestive tract. Due to their anatomical location, HNCs can cause obstruction, odynophagia, or trismus, leading to dysphagia. In addition, this patient group may be vulnerable to treatment side effects both by surgery and oncological treatment, exposing the patients to an even higher risk of malnutrition. The risk of malnourishment is often resolved by applying a feeding gastrostomy tube. The present study aims to identify complication rates after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and open gastrostomy (OG) in patients treated for HNC in a high-volume center. Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Methods A retrospective cohort study of all patients treated for a new diagnosis of HNC at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery at Karolinska University Hospital between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2018 in whom gastrostomy was performed. Results Regarding tumor location, 165 (56.7%) were in the pharynx, 68 (23.4%) in the oral cavity, 57 (19.6%) in the larynx, and 1 (0.3%) in the nasal cavity. PEG was performed in 240 (82.5%) and OG in 51 (17.5%) patients. The overall complication rate was 28.2%: 64 (26.7%) among PEG patients and 18 (35.3%) among OG patients. The incidence of major complications was 3.1%. Conclusions Our study confirms that enteral feeding via gastrostomy is a safe method, regardless of the technique used (PEG or OG), with a low rate of major complications and no mortality linked to the procedure. Level of Evidence 3 Laryngoscope, 2022
引用
收藏
页码:1778 / 1784
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prophylactic placement of gastrostomy feeding tubes before radiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer - Is it worthwhile?
    Scolapio, JS
    Spangler, PR
    Romano, MM
    McLaughlin, MP
    Salassa, JR
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2001, 33 (03) : 215 - 217
  • [22] Predictors of Gastrostomy Tube Placement in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Undergoing Radiation or Chemoradiotherapy: A Systematic Review
    Xiao, Jenny B.
    Cherukupalli, Abhiram
    Tran, Khanh Linh
    Prisman, Eitan
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2024, : 1006 - 1017
  • [23] Validated swallowing and nutrition guidelines for patients with head and neck cancer: Identification of high-risk patients for proactive gastrostomy
    Brown, Teresa E.
    Spurgin, Ann-Louise
    Ross, Lynda
    Tripcony, Lee
    Keller, Jacqui
    Hughes, Brett G. M.
    Hodge, Rob
    Walker, Quenten
    Banks, Merrilyn
    Kenny, Lizbeth Moira
    Crombie, Jane
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2013, 35 (10): : 1385 - 1391
  • [24] Prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in head and neck cancer patients: results of tertiary institute
    Jaakko Pulkkinen
    Jami Rekola
    Mari Asanti
    Reidar Grénman
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2014, 271 : 1755 - 1758
  • [25] Prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in head and neck cancer patients: results of tertiary institute
    Pulkkinen, Jaakko
    Rekola, Jami
    Asanti, Mari
    Grenman, Reidar
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2014, 271 (06) : 1755 - 1758
  • [26] Role of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy for the Nutrition of Head and Neck Cancer Patients before and up to 6 Months after Cancer Treatment
    Kouka, Mussab
    Brand, Sophie
    Koscielny, Sven
    Bitter, Thomas
    Pietschmann, Klaus
    Ernst, Thomas
    Guntinas-Lichius, Orlando
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (18)
  • [27] OUTCOMES AFTER THE USE OF GASTROSTOMY TUBES IN PATIENTS WHOSE HEAD AND NECK CANCER WAS MANAGED WITH RADIATION THERAPY
    Ames, Julie A.
    Karnell, Lucy Hynds
    Gupta, Anjali K.
    Coleman, Todd C.
    Karnell, Michael P.
    Van Daele, Douglas J.
    Funk, Gerry F.
    HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2011, 33 (05): : 638 - 644
  • [28] Usage of prophylactic radiologically inserted gastrostomy in head and neck cancer patients
    Mallinson, P. I.
    Tun, J. Kyaw
    Byass, O. R.
    Cast, J. E. I.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2012, 67 (12) : 1175 - 1178
  • [29] The introducer technique is the optimal method for placing percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tubes in head and neck cancer patients
    Foster, Jason M.
    Filocamo, Peter
    Nava, Hector
    Schiff, Michael
    Hicks, Wesley
    Rigual, Nestor
    Smith, Judy
    Loree, Thom
    Gibbs, John F.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2007, 21 (06): : 897 - 901
  • [30] Prediction model for early percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in head and neck cancer treatment
    Wermker, K.
    Jung, S.
    Hueppmeier, L.
    Joos, U.
    Kleinheinz, J.
    ORAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 48 (04) : 355 - 360