Clinical application of a new device for minimally invasive circumcision

被引:38
作者
Peng, Yi-Feng [1 ]
Cheng, Yue [3 ]
Wang, Guo-Yao [3 ]
Wang, Suo-Qun [4 ]
Jia, Chao [1 ]
Yang, Ben-Hai [1 ]
Zhu, Ru [1 ]
Jian, Shu-Chuan [2 ]
Li, Qing-Wen [5 ]
Geng, Da-Wei [6 ]
机构
[1] Yijishan Hosp, Wannan Med Coll, Dept Sexual Med, Wuhu 241001, Peoples R China
[2] Yijishan Hosp, Wannan Med Coll, Dept Urol, Wuhu 241001, Peoples R China
[3] First Hosp, Ctr Urol, Ningbo 315010, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Peoples Armed Police Forces, Beijing Gen Hosp, Dept Urol, Beijing 100039, Peoples R China
[5] Affiliated Hosp, Bengbu Med Coll, Dept Urol, Bengbu 233000, Peoples R China
[6] Wuhu First Peoples Hosp, Dept Urol, Wuhu 241001, Peoples R China
关键词
excess foreskin; phimosis; circumcision device;
D O I
10.1111/j.1745-7262.2008.00411.x
中图分类号
R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aim: To study the clinical effects of a disposable circumcision device in treatment of male patients of different ages with either phimosis or excess foreskin. Methods: One thousand two hundred patients between the age of 5 and 95 years underwent circumcision using this procedure in the 2-year period between October 2005 and September 2007. Of these cases, 904 had excess foreskin and 296 were cases of phimosis. Results: In 96.33% of the cases the incision healed, leaving a minimal amount of the inner foreskin with no scarring and producing good cosmetic results. There were no incidents of device dislocation or damage to the frenulum. The average operative time was 2.5 min for excess foreskin, and 3.5 min for phimosis. During the 7 days of wearing the device, mild to moderate edema occurred in 10.08 % of cases with excess foreskin and in 2.58 % of those with phimosis. Edema in the frenulum was seen in 1.67% of patients, and only 0.67% had an infection of the incision. A total of 86.25% of patients reported pain due to penile erection. After removal of the device, 0.58% of the cases had minimal bleeding around the incision, and 2.42% had wound dehiscence. Conclusion: The new device can be applied to an overwhelming majority of patients with phimosis and excess foreskin. This technique is relatively simple to perform, and patients who underwent this surgery had very few complications. Antibiotics were not required and patients reported less pain than those who were circumcised using conventional methods. Circumcision with this device requires minimal tissue manipulation, and is quicker and safer than circumcision using conventional techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:447 / 454
页数:8
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Ben Chaim J, 2005, ISR MED ASSOC J, V7, P368
  • [2] CHENG CQ, 2001, CHIN J UROL, V22, P328
  • [3] Dunst C.J., 1999, CHILDRENS LEARNING O, V1, P1
  • [4] Ge CG, 2005, CHIN J MOD MED, V15, P3028
  • [5] Adult male circumcision: results of a standardized procedure in Kisumu District, Kenya
    Krieger, JN
    Bailey, RC
    Opeya, J
    Ayieko, B
    Opiyo, F
    Agot, K
    Parker, C
    Ndinya-Achola, JO
    Magoha, GAO
    Moses, S
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 96 (07) : 1109 - 1113
  • [6] Lazarus J, 2007, SAMJ S AFR MED J, V97, P192
  • [7] MEI H, 1996, OPERATIVE SURGERY UR
  • [8] Religious circumcision: a Muslim view
    Rizvi, SAH
    Naqvi, SAA
    Hussain, M
    Hasan, AS
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 1999, 83 : 13 - 16
  • [9] Tzeng YS, 2004, ASIAN J ANDROL, V6, P161
  • [10] *WHO UNAIDS, 2007, TECHN CONS NEW DAT M