Comparative Study of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) with and without Ultrasound versus Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Detecting Breast Lesion

被引:10
作者
Goh, Janice Hui Ling [1 ]
Tan, Toh Leong [2 ]
Aziz, Suraya [1 ]
Rizuana, Iqbal Hussain [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Fac Med, Dept Radiol, Cheras 56000, Malaysia
[2] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Fac Med, Dept Emergency Med, Cheras 56000, Malaysia
关键词
digital breast tomosynthesis; DBT; 3D mammography; breast MRI; ultrasonography; DENSE BREASTS; MAMMOGRAPHY; WOMEN; CANCER; POPULATION; DIAGNOSIS; RISK;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph19020759
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is a fairly recent breast imaging technique invented to overcome the challenges of overlapping breast tissue. Ultrasonography (USG) was used as a complementary tool to DBT for the purpose of this study. Nonetheless, breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains the most sensitive tool to detect breast lesion. The purpose of this study was to evaluate diagnostic performance of DBT, with and without USG, versus breast MRI in correlation to histopathological examination (HPE). This was a retrospective study in a university hospital over a duration of 24 months. Findings were acquired from a formal report and were correlated with HPE. The sensitivity of DBT with or without USG was lower than MRI. However, the accuracy, specificity and PPV were raised with the aid of USG to equivalent or better than MRI. These three modalities showed statistically significant in correlation with HPE (p < 0.005, chi-squared). Generally, DBT alone has lower sensitivity as compared to MRI. However, it is reassuring that DBT + USG could significantly improve diagnostic performance to that comparable to MRI. In conclusion, results of this study are vital to centers which do not have MRI, as complementary ultrasound can accentuate diagnostic performance of DBT.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer [J].
Berg, Wendie A. ;
Blume, Jeffrey D. ;
Cormack, Jean B. ;
Mendelson, Ellen B. ;
Lehrer, Daniel ;
Bohm-Velez, Marcela ;
Pisano, Etta D. ;
Jong, Roberta A. ;
Evans, W. Phil ;
Morton, Marilyn J. ;
Mahoney, Mary C. ;
Larsen, Linda Hovanessian ;
Barr, Richard G. ;
Farria, Dione M. ;
Marques, Helga S. ;
Boparai, Karan .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2008, 299 (18) :2151-2163
[2]   Positive predictive value for malignancy on surgical excision of breast lesions of uncertain malignant potential (B3) diagnosed by stereotactic vacuum-assisted needle core biopsy (VANCB): A large multi-institutional study in Italy [J].
Bianchi, S. ;
Caini, S. ;
Renne, G. ;
Cassano, E. ;
Ambrogetti, D. ;
Cattani, M. G. ;
Saguatti, G. ;
Chiaramondia, M. ;
Bellotti, E. ;
Bottiglieri, R. ;
Ancona, A. ;
Piubello, Q. ;
Montemezzi, S. ;
Ficarra, G. ;
Mauri, C. ;
Zito, F. A. ;
Ventrella, V. ;
Baccini, P. ;
Calabrese, M. ;
Palli, D. .
BREAST, 2011, 20 (03) :264-270
[3]  
Cai SQ, 2018, INT J CLIN EXP MED, V11, P3455
[4]   Evaluation of Screening Whole-Breast Sonography as a Supplemental Tool in Conjunction With Mammography in Women With Dense Breasts [J].
Chae, Eun Young ;
Kim, Hak Hee ;
Cha, Joo Hee ;
Shin, Hee Jung ;
Kim, Hyunji .
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2013, 32 (09) :1573-1578
[5]   Comparison of Abbreviated Breast MRI vs Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection Among Women With Dense Breasts Undergoing Screening [J].
Comstock, Christopher E. ;
Gatsonis, Constantine ;
Newstead, Gillian M. ;
Snyder, Bradley S. ;
Gareen, Ilana F. ;
Bergin, Jennifer T. ;
Rahbar, Habib ;
Sung, Janice S. ;
Jacobs, Christina ;
Harvey, Jennifer A. ;
Nicholson, Mary H. ;
Ward, Robert C. ;
Holt, Jacqueline ;
Prather, Andrew ;
Miller, Kathy D. ;
Schnall, Mitchell D. ;
Kuhl, Christiane K. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 323 (08) :746-756
[6]   Dense Breast Ultrasound Screening After Digital Mammography Versus After Digital Breast Tomosynthesis [J].
Dibble, Elizabeth H. ;
Singer, Tisha M. ;
Jimoh, Nneka ;
Baird, Grayson L. ;
Lourenco, Ana P. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2019, 213 (06) :1397-1402
[7]   Screening for breast cancer [J].
Elmore, JG ;
Armstrong, K ;
Lehman, CD ;
Fletcher, SW .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 293 (10) :1245-1256
[8]   High risk (B3) breast lesions: What is the incidence of malignancy for individual lesion subtypes? A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Forester, Nerys Dawn ;
Lowes, Simon ;
Mitchell, Elizabeth ;
Twiddy, Maureen .
EJSO, 2019, 45 (04) :519-527
[9]   The role of breast tomosynthesis in a predominantly dense breast population at a tertiary breast centre: breast density assessment and diagnostic performance in comparison with MRI [J].
Fornvik, Daniel ;
Kataoka, Masako ;
Iima, Mami ;
Ohashi, Akane ;
Kanao, Shotaro ;
Toi, Masakazu ;
Togashi, Kaori .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2018, 28 (08) :3194-3203
[10]   Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography versus mammography for breast cancer screening in women at average risk [J].
Gartlehner, Gerald ;
Thaler, Kylie ;
Chapman, Andrea ;
Kaminski-Hartenthaler, Angela ;
Berzaczy, Dominik ;
Van Noord, Megan G. ;
Helbich, Thomas H. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2013, (04)