Research Review: The effects of mindfulness-based interventions on cognition and mental health in children and adolescents - a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:320
作者
Dunning, Darren L. [1 ]
Griffiths, Kirsty [1 ]
Kuyken, Willem [2 ]
Crane, Catherine [2 ]
Foulkes, Lucy [3 ]
Parker, Jenna [1 ]
Dalgleish, Tim [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Med Res Council Cognit & Brain Sci Unit, 15 Chaucer Rd, Cambridge CB2 7EF, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Dept Psychiat, Oxford, England
[3] UCL, Inst Cognit Neurosci, London, England
[4] Cambridgeshire & Peterborough NHS Fdn Trust, Cambridge, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
Mindfulness; meta-analysis; intervention; adolescence; attention; AMBULATORY BLOOD-PRESSURE; BREATHING AWARENESS MEDITATION; ELEMENTARY-SCHOOL STUDENTS; STRESS REDUCTION; PUBLICATION BIAS; THERAPY; IMPACT; YOUTH; PREVENTION; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1111/jcpp.12980
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Background Mindfulness based interventions (MBIs) are an increasingly popular way of attempting to improve the behavioural, cognitive and mental health outcomes of children and adolescents, though there is a suggestion that enthusiasm has moved ahead of the evidence base. Most evaluations of MBIs are either uncontrolled or nonrandomized trials. This meta-analysis aims to establish the efficacy of MBIs for children and adolescents in studies that have adopted a randomized, controlled trial (RCT) design. Methods A systematic literature search of RCTs of MBIs was conducted up to October 2017. Thirty-three independent studies including 3,666 children and adolescents were included in random effects meta-analyses with outcome measures categorized into cognitive, behavioural and emotional factors. Separate random effects meta-analyses were completed for the seventeen studies (n = 1,762) that used an RCT design with an active control condition. Results Across all RCTs we found significant positive effects of MBIs, relative to controls, for the outcome categories of Mindfulness, Executive Functioning, Attention, Depression, Anxiety/Stress and Negative Behaviours, with small effect sizes (Cohen's d), ranging from .16 to .30. However, when considering only those RCTs with active control groups, significant benefits of an MBI were restricted to the outcomes of Mindfulness (d = .42), Depression (d = .47) and Anxiety/Stress (d = .18) only. Conclusions This meta-analysis reinforces the efficacy of using MBIs for improving the mental health and wellbeing of youth as assessed using the gold standard RCT methodology. Future RCT evaluations should incorporate scaled-up definitive trial designs to further evaluate the robustness of MBIs in youth, with an embedded focus on mechanisms of action.
引用
收藏
页码:244 / 258
页数:15
相关论文
共 90 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2000, A framework for development and evaluation of RCTs for complex interventions to improve health
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1988, STAT POWER ANAL BEHA
  • [3] [Anonymous], DEV EV COMPL EV NEW
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2009, SUMA PSICOLOGICA
  • [5] [Anonymous], THESIS
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2010, FOCUS ALTERN COMPLEM, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.2042-7166.2003.TB04008.X
  • [7] [Anonymous], J COMPLEMENTARY INTE
  • [8] [Anonymous], PEDIATRICS
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2004, Development, Factor Structure, and Initial Validation of the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2010, KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT