Estimation and Analysis of Some Generalized Multiple Change-Point Software Reliability Models

被引:78
作者
Huang, Chin-Yu [1 ]
Lyu, Michael R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Tsing Hua Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Hsinchu 30043, Taiwan
[2] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Change point; imperfect debugging; non-homogeneous Poisson process (NHPP); software reliability growth model (SRGM); software testing; ERROR-DETECTION;
D O I
10.1109/TR.2011.2134350
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Software typically undergoes debugging during both a testing phase before product release, and an operational phase after product release. But it is noted that the fault detection and removal processes during software development and operation are different. For example, the fault removal during operation occurs generally at a slower pace than development. In this paper, we derive a powerful, easily deployable technique for software reliability prediction and assessment in the testing and operational phases. We first review how several existing software reliability growth models (SRGM) based on non-homogeneous Poisson processes (NHPP) can be readily derived from a unified theory. With the unified theory, we further incorporate the concept of multiple change-points, i.e. points in time when the software environment changes, into software reliability modeling. Several models are proposed and discussed under both ideal and imperfect debugging conditions. We estimate the parameters of the proposed models by employing real software failure data, and give a fair comparison with some existing SRGM. Numerical results show that the proposed models can provide good software reliability prediction in the various stages of software development and operation. Our approach is flexible; we can model various environments ranging from exponential-type to S-shaped NHPP models.
引用
收藏
页码:498 / 514
页数:17
相关论文
共 54 条
[31]   Staffing Level and Cost Analyses for Software Debugging Activities Through Rate-Based Simulation Approaches [J].
Lin, Chu-Ti ;
Huang, Chin-Yu .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 2009, 58 (04) :711-724
[32]   Software reliability engineering: A roadmap [J].
Lyu, Michael R. .
FOSE 2007: FUTURE OF SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, 2007, :153-170
[33]  
Musa J. D., 1987, Software reliability: Measurement, prediction, application
[34]  
Musa JohnD., 2004, Software Reliability Engineering: More Reliable Software Faster and Cheaper, V2nd
[35]  
Ohba M., 1989, Proceedings. 11th International Conference on Software Engineering (Cat. No.89CH2718-5), P237, DOI 10.1145/74587.74619
[36]   OPTIMUM SOFTWARE-RELEASE TIME CONSIDERING AN ERROR-DETECTION PHENOMENON DURING OPERATION [J].
OHTERA, H ;
YAMADA, S .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON RELIABILITY, 1990, 39 (05) :596-599
[37]   A reliability assessment method for software products in operational phase-proposal of an accelerated life testing model [J].
Okamura, Hiroyuki ;
Dohi, Tadashi ;
Osaki, Shunji .
Electronics and Communications in Japan, Part III: Fundamental Electronic Science (English translation of Denshi Tsushin Gakkai Ronbunshi), 2001, 84 (08) :25-33
[38]  
Pham H, 1999, IEEE T RELIAB, V48, P169
[39]  
PHILIP T, 1996, TR9601 DUK U
[40]  
Rook Paul., 1990, Software Reliability Handbook