Managing Software Development Projects for Success: Aligning Plan- and Agility-Based Approaches to Project Complexity and Project Dynamism

被引:32
作者
Butler, Charles W. [1 ]
Vijayasarathy, Leo R. [1 ]
Roberts, Nicholas [1 ]
机构
[1] Colorado State Univ, Coll Business, Dept Comp Informat Syst, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
关键词
agility-based project management; plan-based project management; project complexity; project dynamism; software development project; MODEL; RISK; UNCERTAINTY; MANAGEMENT; PERFORMANCE; CONCEPTUALIZATION; OPERATIONS; INNOVATION; AMBIGUITY; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1177/8756972819848251
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In general, project complexity and project dynamism are recognized as potent characteristics that influence, usually in a negative way, the outcome of software development projects. However, with respect to the two dominant paradigms for managing software development projects (i.e., plan-based project approach and agility-based project approach), there is less agreement as to which one is better. Emerging research suggests that the preeminence of one approach over another is a matter of fit between the project management approach and the project context, including its complexity and dynamism. We contribute to this line of research by studying the moderating influence of the two project management approaches on the relationship between project complexity and project dynamism on project outcomes. Our analysis of data gathered from a survey of software development professionals shows that managing dynamism is critical for realizing project success, and an agility-based project approach is best suited for mitigating dynamism's negative effects on project success.
引用
收藏
页码:262 / 277
页数:16
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]   Team Climate, Team Cognition, Team Intuition, and Software Quality: The Moderating Role of Project Complexity [J].
Acikgoz, Atif ;
Gunsel, Ayse ;
Bayyurt, Nizamettin ;
Kuzey, Cemil .
GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2014, 23 (05) :1145-1176
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, A Guide to the SCRUM BODY OF KNOWLEDGE (SBOK TM GUIDE) Third Edition A Comprehensive Guide to Deliver Projects using Scrum Includes two chapters about Scaling Scrum for Large Projects and the Enterprise
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1994, The management of innovation
[4]   Weighing the Benefits and Costs of Flexibility in Making Software: Toward a Contingency Theory of the Determinants of Development Process Design [J].
Austin, Robert D. ;
Devin, Lee .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2009, 20 (03) :462-477
[5]  
Baccarini D., 1996, International Journal of Project Management, V14, P201, DOI 10.1016/0263-7863(95)00093-3
[6]   An integrative contingency model of software project risk management [J].
Barki, H ;
Rivard, S ;
Talbot, J .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2001, 17 (04) :37-69
[7]  
Barlow JB, 2011, COMMUN ASSOC INF SYS, V29
[8]   A comparison of 'traditional' and multimedia information systems development practices [J].
Barry, C ;
Lang, M .
INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 45 (04) :217-227
[9]   Short cycle time systems development [J].
Baskerville, R ;
Pries-Heje, J .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 2004, 14 (03) :237-264
[10]  
Batra D, 2010, COMMUN ASSOC INF SYS, V27, P379