When, where and how to estimate persistent and transient efficiency in stochastic frontier panel data models

被引:57
作者
Badunenko, Oleg [1 ]
Kumbhakar, Subal C. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cologne, Fac Management Econ & Social Sci, Albertus Magnus Pl, D-50923 Cologne, Germany
[2] SUNY Binghamton, Dept Econ, Binghamton, NY 13902 USA
[3] Univ Stavanger, Sch Business, Stavanger, Norway
关键词
(D) Production/Cost Function; Heterogeneity; Inefficiency; Closed-skew normal distribution; Simulated maximum likelihood; TECHNICAL INEFFICIENCY; HETEROGENEITY; SPECIFICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2016.04.049
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
In this paper we examine robustness of a recently developed panel data stochastic frontier model that allows for both persistent and transient (also known as long-run and short-run or time-invariant and time-varying) inefficiency along with random firm-effects (heterogeneity) and noise. We address some concerns that the practitioners might have about this model. First, given that there are two random time-invariant components (persistent inefficiency and firm-effects) the concern is whether the model can accurately identify them, and if so how precisely can the model estimate them? Second, there are two time-varying random components (transient inefficiency and noise), and the concern is whether the model can separate noise from transient inefficiency, and if so how precisely can the model estimate transient inefficiency? Third, how well are persistent and transient inefficiency estimated under different scenarios, viz., under different configurations of the variance parameters of the four random components? Given that the model is quite complex, relatively new and becoming quite popular in the panel efficiency literature, we feel that there is need for a detailed simulation study to examine when, where and how one can use this model with confidence to estimate persistent and transient inefficiency. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:272 / 287
页数:16
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Aigner D., 1977, J. Econometrics, V6, P21, DOI DOI 10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5
[2]  
Alvarez A., 2004, EC WORKING PAPERS CT
[3]  
Battese G.E., 1992, J. Product. Anal., V3, P153, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF00158774
[4]   PREDICTION OF FIRM-LEVEL TECHNICAL EFFICIENCIES WITH A GENERALIZED FRONTIER PRODUCTION FUNCTION AND PANEL DATA [J].
BATTESE, GE ;
COELLI, TJ .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1988, 38 (03) :387-399
[5]   Effects of heterogeneity on bank efficiency scores [J].
Bos, J. W. B. ;
Koetter, M. ;
Kolari, J. W. ;
Kool, C. J. M. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2009, 195 (01) :251-261
[6]   A COMPUTATIONALLY EFFICIENT QUADRATURE PROCEDURE FOR THE ONE-FACTOR MULTINOMIAL PROBIT MODEL [J].
BUTLER, JS ;
MOFFITT, R .
ECONOMETRICA, 1982, 50 (03) :761-764
[7]   ESTIMATORS AND HYPOTHESIS TESTS FOR A STOCHASTIC FRONTIER FUNCTION - A MONTE-CARLO ANALYSIS [J].
COELLI, T .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 1995, 6 (03) :247-268
[8]   Closed-skew normality in stochastic frontiers with individual effects and long/short-run efficiency [J].
Colombi, Roberto ;
Kumbhakar, Subal C. ;
Martini, Gianmaria ;
Vittadini, Giorgio .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2014, 42 (02) :123-136
[9]   PRODUCTION FRONTIERS WITH CROSS-SECTIONAL AND TIME-SERIES VARIATION IN EFFICIENCY LEVELS [J].
CORNWELL, C ;
SCHMIDT, P ;
SICKLES, RC .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1990, 46 (1-2) :185-200
[10]   Persistent and transient productive inefficiency: a maximum simulated likelihood approach [J].
Filippini, Massimo ;
Greene, William .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2016, 45 (02) :187-196