Ethical issues in clinical neuroscience research: A patient's perspective

被引:15
|
作者
Cohen, Perry D. [1 ]
Herman, Linda [1 ]
Jedlinski, Sheryl [1 ]
Willocks, Peggy [1 ]
Wittekind, Paula [1 ]
机构
[1] Parkinson Pipeline Project, Washington, DC 20015 USA
关键词
Parkinson's disease; sham surgery; placebo; ethics; conflict of interest; patient voice; patient-centered care;
D O I
10.1016/j.nurt.2007.04.008
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
A patient-centered paradigm for clinical research and medical care is presented as a solution to the problem of declining innovation and increasing costs and development time in the pipeline for new therapies. Fundamental differences in values and motivations among scientists, clinicians, industry sponsor, and patients in neurotherapeutics provide a framework for analysis of ethical conflicts and the loss of public confidence in medical research. Parkinson advocates' views on clinical trial participation, perceived risks and benefits, placebo controls, and sham surgery are presented. These views reflect the sense of urgency and the unique perspective that comes from living with this progressive, debilitating condition full time. A patient-centered paradigm that includes authentic voices of patients as collaborators at every stage of development will help to resolve conflicts, build trust, recruit trial participants, and accelerate new therapies. Key elements are adaptive clinical trial methods and the development of information technology for the assessment of outcomes and surveillance of safety over the life cycle of a medical product. Supported by the Parkinson's Disease Foundation, the Parkinson Pipeline Project is a grassroots group of Parkinson's patients whose goal is to represent an authentic voice for patients in the treatment development process. This group promotes education and communication between members of the Parkinson's community and active stakeholders in medical research, industry, and regulatory agencies. Its members are an example of a new breed of knowledgeable consumers, armed with first-hand access to research findings and reinforced by on-line connections to like-minded peers throughout the world.
引用
收藏
页码:537 / 544
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] BEHAVIOURAL ISSUES - PATIENT'S PERSPECTIVE
    Harris, A.
    HAEMOPHILIA, 2021, 27 : 10 - 11
  • [32] DEEP BRAIN STIMULATION IN PSYCHIATRY: THE PATIENT'S JOURNEY, CLINICAL DILEMMAS AND ETHICAL ISSUES
    Marsh, R.
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 53 : 56 - 57
  • [34] Evolving ethical issues in selection of subjects for clinical research
    Weijer, C
    CAMBRIDGE QUARTERLY OF HEALTHCARE ETHICS, 1996, 5 (03) : 334 - 345
  • [35] FURTHER ETHICAL ISSUES IN CLINICAL CANCER-RESEARCH
    WIKLER, D
    SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 1981, 8 (04) : 478 - 478
  • [36] SOME ETHICAL ISSUES IN RECENT DISCUSSIONS OF CLINICAL RESEARCH
    WALTERS, L
    ACTA PHARMACOLOGICA ET TOXICOLOGICA, 1986, 59 : 23 - 23
  • [37] Ethical issues in clinical research: An issue for all internists
    Wolf, LE
    Lo, B
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 109 (01): : 82 - 85
  • [38] DISCLOSURE ISSUES IN NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH
    Parker, Lisa S.
    Kienholz, Michelle L.
    ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-POLICIES AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2008, 15 (04): : 226 - 241
  • [39] Ethical aspects of patient referral in clinical research
    Roitman, Adriel
    Serrano, Cecilia
    Dominguez, Adriana
    Perelis, Leonardo
    Ossorio, Maria F.
    ARCHIVOS ARGENTINOS DE PEDIATRIA, 2024,
  • [40] Ethical Issues in Patient Safety Research: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Whicher, Danielle M.
    Kass, Nancy E.
    Audera-Lopez, Carmen
    Butt, Mobasher
    Jauregui, Iciar Larizgoitia
    Harris, Kendra
    Knoche, Jonathan
    Saxena, Abha
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT SAFETY, 2015, 11 (03) : 174 - 184