THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION IN TREATMENT-RESISTANT BIPOLAR DEPRESSION

被引:10
|
作者
Zengin, Gulizar [1 ]
Topak, Osman Zulkif [1 ]
Atesci, Oyku [2 ]
Atesci, Figen Culha [1 ]
机构
[1] Pamukkale Univ, Dept Psychiat, Knukh Campus Pamukkale, Denizli, Turkey
[2] Acibadem Univ, Fac Med, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
bipolar depression; treatment resistant; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; DOUBLE-BLIND; MAJOR DEPRESSION; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; TMS TREATMENT; ADD-ON; DISORDER; DURATION; THERAPY; RTMS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Backround: The aim of the current study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) treatment, a non-invasive brain stimulation technique, on depressive symptoms in treatment-resistant bipolar depression (TRBD). Subjects and methods: The study included 29 patients between the ages of 18-65, with bipolar disorder depressive episode according to DSM-5 and with the decision of non-response to treatment according to the Canadian Mood and Anxiety Treatment Network (CANMAT). Patients were divided into two groups double-blind-randomly, 20 sessions of TMS and 20 sessions of sham TMS were applied crossover. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) and TMS Side Effect Questionnaire were applied to the patients before the treatment, at the 2nd week which is the crossover phase, and at the end of the treatment at 4th week. Results: In both groups, the severity of depression was decreased significantly according to HAM-D and BDI scores after the procedure. As well as active stimulation, some positive placebo effects were observed with sham stimulation. But the decreases seen in HAM-D and BDI scores and response to the treatment were higher during the weeks when the groups received active stimulation (respectively p=0.000, p=0.001, p=0.005). At the end of the study, according to HAM-D, 55.7% of the patients showed response to the treatment, 24.13% partial response. According to BDI, 41.37% of the patients showed response to the treatment, and 31.03% partial response. No associations were found between TMS response and sociodemographic - clinical features, or type of the disease (p>0.05). During the study, no serious adverse effects such as seizures or manic / hypomanic switches were observed. Conclusions: The results of our study showed that TMS treatment is an effective and safe treatment for patients with treatment-resistant bipolar depression.
引用
收藏
页码:236 / 244
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies
    Lan, Xian-Jun
    Yang, Xin-Hu
    Mo, Yu
    Deng, Can-Jin
    Huang, Xing-Bing
    Cai, Dong-Bin
    Zheng, Wei
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2024, 96
  • [22] Treatment expectations and clinical outcomes following repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant depression
    Mollica, Adriano
    Ng, Enoch
    Burke, Matthew J.
    Nestor, Sean M.
    Lee, Hyewon
    Rabin, Jennifer S.
    Hamani, Clement
    Lipsman, Nir
    Giacobbe, Peter
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2024, 17 (04) : 752 - 759
  • [23] Noninvasive Brain Stimulation Techniques for Treatment-Resistant Depression Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
    Boscutti, Andrea
    De Figueiredo, Juliana Mendonca
    Razouq, Dana
    Murphy, Nicholas
    Cho, Raymond
    Selvaraj, Sudhakar
    PSYCHIATRIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2023, 46 (02) : 307 - 329
  • [24] Electroconvulsive Therapy, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, and Deep Brain Stimulation in Treatment-Resistant Depression
    Livingston, Robin
    Anandan, Sharadamani
    Moukaddam, Nidal
    PSYCHIATRIC ANNALS, 2016, 46 (04) : 240 - 246
  • [25] A Retrospective Naturalistic Study Comparing the Efficacy of Ketamine and Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression
    Mikellides, Georgios
    Michael, Panayiota
    Psalta, Lilia
    Schuhmann, Teresa
    Sack, Alexander T.
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 12
  • [26] Neurostructural Differences in Adolescents With Treatment-Resistant Depression and Treatment Effects of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
    Seewoo, Bhedita J.
    Rodger, Jennifer
    Demitrack, Mark A.
    Heart, Karen L.
    Port, John D.
    Strawn, Jeffrey R.
    Croarkin, Paul E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 25 (08) : 619 - 630
  • [27] Clinical efficacy and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in acute bipolar depression
    McGirr, Alexander
    Karmani, Sneha
    Arsappa, Rashmi
    Berlim, Marcelo T.
    Thirthalli, Jagadisha
    Muralidharan, Kesavan
    Yatham, Lakshmi N.
    WORLD PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 15 (01): : 85 - 86
  • [28] A retrospective analysis of bipolar depression treated with transcranial magnetic stimulation
    Goldwaser, Eric L.
    Daddario, Kathy
    Aaronson, Scott T.
    BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR, 2020, 10 (12):
  • [29] Cost-Utility Analysis of Electroconvulsive Therapy and Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression in Ontario
    Fitzgibbon, Kyle P.
    Plett, Donna
    Chan, Brian C. F.
    Hancock-Howard, Rebecca
    Coyte, Peter C.
    Blumberger, Daniel M.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE, 2020, 65 (03): : 164 - 173
  • [30] Safety, Tolerability, and Effectiveness of High Doses of Adjunctive Daily Left Prefrontal Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression in a Clinical Setting
    Hadley, Dakota
    Anderson, Berry S.
    Borckardt, Jeffrey J.
    Arana, Ashley
    Li, Xingbao
    Nahas, Ziad
    George, Mark S.
    JOURNAL OF ECT, 2011, 27 (01) : 18 - 25