Long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic vs open surgery for stages II and III rectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study

被引:19
作者
Zhou, Zhen-Xu [1 ]
Zhao, Li-Ying [1 ]
Lin, Tian [1 ]
Liu, Hao [1 ]
Deng, Hai-Jun [1 ]
Zhu, Heng-Liang [1 ]
Yan, Jun [1 ]
Li, Guo-Xin [1 ]
机构
[1] Southern Med Univ, Nanfang Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Guangzhou 510515, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划);
关键词
Laparoscopic surgery; Locally advanced rectal cancer; Oncologic outcomes; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; MRC CLASICC TRIAL; CIRCUMFERENTIAL MARGIN; COLORECTAL-CANCER; PROGNOSTIC-FACTOR; OPEN RESECTION; SURVIVAL; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.3748/wjg.v21.i18.5505
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
AIM: To evaluate the 5-year survival after laparoscopic surgery vs open surgery for stages. and. rectal cancer. METHODS: This study enrolled 406 consecutive patients who underwent curative resection for stages. and. rectal cancer between January 2000 and December 2009 [laparoscopic rectal resection (LRR), n = 152; open rectal resection (ORR), n = 254]. Clinical characteristics, operative outcomes, pathological outcomes, postoperative recovery, and 5-year survival outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Most of the clinical characteristics were similar except age (59 years vs 55 years, P = 0.033) between the LRR group and ORR group. The proportion of anterior resection was higher in the LRR group than that in the ORR group (81.6% vs 66.1%, P = 0.001). The LRR group had less estimated blood loss (50 mL vs 200 mL, P < 0.001) and a lower rate of blood transfusion (4.6% vs 11.8%, P = 0.019) compared to the ORR group. The pathological outcomes of the two groups were comparable. The LRR group was associated with faster recovery of bowel function (2.8 d vs 3.7 d, P < 0.001) and shorter postoperative hospital stay (11.7 d vs 13.7 d, P < 0.001). The median followup time was 63 mo in the LRR group and 65 mo in the ORR group. As for the survival outcomes, the 5-year local recurrence rate (16.0% vs 16.4%, P = 0.753), 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate (63.0% vs 63.1%, P = 0.589), and 5-year overall survival (OS) rate (68.1% vs 63.5%, P = 0.682) were comparable between the LRR group and the ORR group. Stageby stage, there were also no statistical differences between the LRR group and the ORR group in terms of the 5-year local recurrence rate (stage II : 6.3% vs 8.7%, P = 0.623; stage III : 26.4% vs 23.2%, P = 0.747), 5-year DFS rate (stage II : 77.5% vs 77.6%, P = 0.462; stage III : 46.5% vs 50.9%, P = 0.738), and 5-year OS rate (stage II: 81.4% vs 74.3%, P = 0.242; stage III : 53.9% vs 54.1%, P = 0.459). CONCLUSION: LRR for stages. and. rectal cancer can yield comparable long-term survival while achieving short-term benefits compared to open surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:5505 / 5512
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] ROLE OF CIRCUMFERENTIAL MARGIN INVOLVEMENT IN THE LOCAL RECURRENCE OF RECTAL-CANCER
    ADAM, IJ
    MOHAMDEE, MO
    MARTIN, IG
    SCOTT, N
    FINAN, PJ
    JOHNSTON, D
    DIXON, MF
    QUIRKE, P
    [J]. LANCET, 1994, 344 (8924) : 707 - 711
  • [2] Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic factor in rectal cancer
    Bernstein, T. E.
    Endreseth, B. H.
    Romundstad, P.
    Wibe, A.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 96 (11) : 1348 - 1357
  • [3] Laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer: A prospective analysis of patient survival and outcomes
    Bianchi, Paolo Pietro
    Rosati, Riccardo
    Bona, Stefano
    Rottoli, Matteo
    Elmore, Ugo
    Ceriani, Chiara
    Malesci, Alberto
    Montorsi, Marco
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2007, 50 (12) : 2047 - 2053
  • [4] Rates of circumferential resection margin involvement vary between surgeons and predict outcomes in rectal cancer surgery
    Birbeck, KF
    Macklin, CP
    Tiffin, NJ
    Parsons, W
    Dixon, MF
    Mapstone, NP
    Abbott, CR
    Scott, N
    Finan, PJ
    Johnston, D
    Quirke, P
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2002, 235 (04) : 449 - 457
  • [5] Rectal cancer: prognostic indicators of long-term outcome in patients considered for surgery
    Bown, E. J.
    Lloyd, G. M.
    Boyle, K. M.
    Miller, A. S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2014, 29 (02) : 147 - 155
  • [6] Laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer patients: Outcome and cost-benefit analysis
    Braga, Marco
    Frasson, Matteo
    Vignali, Andrea
    Zuliani, Walter
    Capretti, Giovanni
    Di Carlo, Valerio
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2007, 50 (04) : 464 - 471
  • [7] Laparoscopy as a prognostic factor in curative resection for node positive colorectal cancer - Results for a single-institution nonrandomized prospective trial
    Capussotti, L
    Massucco, P
    Muratore, A
    Amisano, M
    Bima, C
    Zorzi, D
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2004, 18 (07): : 1130 - 1135
  • [8] Perioperative blood transfusions reduce long-term survival following surgery for colorectal cancer
    Edna, TH
    Bjerkeset, T
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1998, 41 (04) : 451 - 459
  • [9] Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial
    Guillou, PJ
    Quirke, P
    Thorpe, H
    Walker, J
    Jayne, DG
    Smith, AMH
    Heath, RM
    Brown, JM
    [J]. LANCET, 2005, 365 (9472) : 1718 - 1726
  • [10] Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer
    Jayne, D. G.
    Thorpe, H. C.
    Copeland, J.
    Quirke, P.
    Brown, J. M.
    Guillou, P. J.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 97 (11) : 1638 - 1645