Soil infiltration, runoff and sediment yield from a shallow soil with varied stone cover and intensity of rain

被引:73
作者
Mandal, UK [1 ]
Rao, KV [1 ]
Mishra, PK [1 ]
Vittal, KPR [1 ]
Sharma, KL [1 ]
Narsimlu, B [1 ]
Venkanna, K [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent Res Inst Dryland Agr, Hyderabad 500059, Andhra Pradesh, India
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2389.2004.00687.x
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Stones on the surface of the soil enhance infiltration and protect the soil against erosion. They are often removed in modern mechanized agriculture, with unfortunate side-effects. We evaluated experimentally the influence of surface stones on infiltration, runoff and erosion under field conditions using a portable rainfall simulator on bare natural soil in semi-arid tropical India, because modernization and mechanization often lead to removal of these stones in this region. Four fields with varied cover of stones from 3 to 65% were exposed to three rainfall intensities (48.5, 89.2 and 136.8 mm hour(-1)). Surface stones retarded surface runoff, increased final infiltration rates, and diminished sediment concentration and soil loss. The final infiltration ranged from 26 to 83% of rainfall when the rainfall intensity was 136.8 mm hour(-1). The reduction in runoff and soil erosion and increase in infiltration were more pronounced where stones rested on the soil surface than where they were buried in the surface layer. The sediment yield increased from 2 g l(-1) for 64.7% stone cover with rainfall of 48.5 mm hour(-1) to 70 g l(-1) for 3.5% stone cover with rain falling at 136.8 mm hour(-1). The soil loss rate was less than 2 t ha(-1) hour(-1) for the field with stone cover of 64.7% even when the rainfall intensity was increased to 136.8 mm hour(-1). The effects of stones on soil loss under the varied rainfall intensities were expressed mathematically. The particles in the sediment that ran off were mostly of silt size.
引用
收藏
页码:435 / 443
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of simulated wind followed by rain on runoff and sediment yield from a sandy loessial soil with rills
    Qingyin Zhang
    Jun Fan
    Xiaoping Zhang
    Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2016, 16 : 2306 - 2315
  • [2] Effects of simulated wind followed by rain on runoff and sediment yield from a sandy loessial soil with rills
    Zhang, Qingyin
    Fan, Jun
    Zhang, Xiaoping
    JOURNAL OF SOILS AND SEDIMENTS, 2016, 16 (09) : 2306 - 2315
  • [3] On the infiltration of rain water through the soil with runoff of the excess water
    Borsi, I
    Farina, A
    Fasano, A
    NONLINEAR ANALYSIS-REAL WORLD APPLICATIONS, 2004, 5 (05) : 763 - 800
  • [4] Processes of rainfall infiltration, runoff and sediment yield on purple soil slope containing rock fragments
    Wang, Xiaoyan
    Wang, Tianwei
    Cai, Chongfa
    Xie, Deti
    Shuikexue Jinzhan/Advances in Water Science, 2014, 25 (02): : 189 - 195
  • [5] Biocrust islands enhance infiltration, and reduce runoff and sediment yield on a heavily salinized dryland soil
    Kakeh, Jalil
    Gorji, Manouchehr
    Mohammadi, Mohammad Hossein
    Asadi, Hossein
    Khormali, Farhad
    Sohrabi, Mohammad
    Eldridge, David J.
    GEODERMA, 2021, 404
  • [6] STONE-COVER AND RAIN INTENSITY - EFFECTS ON INFILTRATION, EROSION AND WATER SPLASH
    AGASSI, M
    LEVY, GJ
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF SOIL RESEARCH, 1991, 29 (04): : 565 - 575
  • [7] Effects of rainfall intensity and slope gradient on runoff and sediment yield characteristics of bare loess soil
    Lei Wu
    Mengling Peng
    Shanshan Qiao
    Xiao-yi Ma
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2018, 25 : 3480 - 3487
  • [8] Effects of rainfall intensity and slope gradient on runoff and sediment yield characteristics of bare loess soil
    Wu, Lei
    Peng, Mengling
    Qiao, Shanshan
    Ma, Xiao-yi
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2018, 25 (04) : 3480 - 3487
  • [10] Effects of Bahia Grass Cover and Mulch on Runoff and Sediment Yield of Sloping Red Soil in Southern China
    Li Xin-Hu
    Zhang Zhan-Yu
    Yang Jie
    Zhang Guo-Hua
    Wang Bin
    PEDOSPHERE, 2011, 21 (02) : 238 - 243