Impact of model and dose uncertainty on model-based selection of oropharyngeal cancer patients for proton therapy

被引:33
|
作者
Bijman, Rik G. [1 ]
Breedveld, Sebastiaan [1 ]
Arts, Tine [1 ]
Astreinidou, Eleftheria [2 ]
de Jong, Martin A. [2 ]
Granton, Patrick V. [1 ]
Petit, Steven F. [1 ]
Hoogeman, Mischa S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, POB 5201, NL-3008 AE Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] LUMC, Dept Radiat Oncol, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
COMPLICATION PROBABILITY; SETUP UNCERTAINTIES; RADIOTHERAPY; OPTIMIZATION; HEAD; ROBUSTNESS; RANGE;
D O I
10.1080/0284186X.2017.1355113
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Proton therapy is becoming increasingly available, so it is important to apply objective and individualized patient selection to identify those who are expected to benefit most from proton therapy compared to conventional intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Comparative treatment planning using normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) evaluation has recently been proposed. This work investigates the impact of NTCP model and dose uncertainties on model-based patient selection. Material and Methods: We used IMRT and intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) treatment plans of 78 oropharyngeal cancer patients, which were generated based on automated treatment planning and evaluated based on three published NTCP models. A reduction in NTCP of more than a certain threshold (e.g. 10% lower NTCP) leads to patient selection for IMPT, referred to as 'nominal' selection. To simulate the effect of uncertainties in NTCP-model coefficients (based on reported confidence intervals) and planned doses on the accuracy of model-based patient selection, the Monte Carlo method was used to sample NTCP-model coefficients and doses from a probability distribution centered at their nominal values. Patient selection accuracy within a certain sample was defined as the fraction of patients which had similar selection in both the 'nominal' and 'sampled' scenario. Results: For all three NTCP models, the median patient selection accuracy was found to be above 70% when only NTCP-model uncertainty was considered. Selection accuracy decreased with increasing uncertainty resulting from differences between planned and delivered dose. In case of excessive dose uncertainty, selection accuracy decreased to 60%. Conclusion: Model and dose uncertainty highly influence the accuracy of model-based patient selection for proton therapy. A reduction of NTCP-model uncertainty is necessary to reach more accurate model-based patient selection.
引用
收藏
页码:1444 / 1450
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Patient selection for proton therapy using Normal Tissue Complication Probability with deep learning dose prediction for oropharyngeal cancer
    Huet-Dastarac, Margerie
    Michiels, Steven
    Rivas, Sara Teruel
    Ozan, Hamdiye
    Sterpin, Edmond
    Lee, John A. A.
    Barragan-Montero, Ana
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 50 (10) : 6201 - 6214
  • [12] Model-Based Management of Lung Cancer Radiation Therapy
    Ghita, Maria
    Drexler, Daniel A.
    Kovacs, Levente
    Copot, Dana
    Muresan, Cristina, I
    Ionescu, Clara M.
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2020, 53 (02): : 15928 - 15933
  • [13] Machine learning-based automatic proton therapy planning: Impact of post-processing and dose-mimicking in plan robustness
    Borderias-Villarroel, Elena
    Dastarac, Margerie Huet
    Barragan-Montero, Ana Maria
    Helander, Rasmus
    Holmstrom, Mats
    Geets, Xavier
    Sterpin, Edmond
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 50 (07) : 4480 - 4490
  • [14] Spot scanning proton arc therapy reduces toxicity in oropharyngeal cancer patients
    de Jong, Bas A.
    Battinelli, Cecilia
    Free, Jeffrey
    Wagenaar, Dirk
    Engwall, Erik
    Janssens, Guillaume
    Langendijk, Johannes A.
    Korevaar, Erik W.
    Both, Stefan
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 50 (03) : 1305 - 1317
  • [15] Impact of a commercially available model-based dose calculation algorithm on treatment planning of high-dose-rate brachytherapy in patients with cervical cancer
    Abe, Kota
    Kadoya, Noriyuki
    Sato, Shinya
    Hashimoto, Shimpei
    Nakajima, Yujiro
    Miyasaka, Yuya
    Ito, Kengo
    Umezawa, Rei
    Yamamoto, Takaya
    Takahashi, Noriyoshi
    Takeda, Ken
    Jingu, Keiichi
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2018, 59 (02) : 198 - 206
  • [16] Perspectives on the model-based approach to proton therapy trials: A retrospective study of a lung cancer randomized trial
    McNamara, Aimee L.
    Hall, David C.
    Shusharina, Nadya
    Liu, Amy
    Wei, Xiong
    Ajdari, Ali
    Mohan, Radhe
    Liao, Zhongxing
    Paganetti, Harald
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 147 : 8 - 14
  • [17] The price of robustness; impact of worst-case optimization on organ-at-risk dose and complication probability in intensity-modulated proton therapy for oropharyngeal cancer patients
    van de Water, Steven
    van Dam, Iris
    Schaart, Dennis R.
    Al-Mamgani, Abrahim
    Heijmen, Ben J. M.
    Hoogeman, Mischa S.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 120 (01) : 56 - 62
  • [18] Proton vs photon: A model-based approach to patient selection for reduction of cardiac toxicity in locally advanced lung cancer
    Teoh, S.
    Fiorini, F.
    George, B.
    Vallis, K. A.
    Van den Heuvel, F.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 152 : 151 - 162
  • [19] Analysis of acute-phase toxicities of intensity-modulated proton therapy using a model-based approach in pharyngeal cancer patients
    Yasuda, Koichi
    Minatogawa, Hideki
    Dekura, Yasuhiro
    Takao, Seishin
    Tamura, Masaya
    Tsushima, Nayuta
    Suzuki, Takayoshi
    Kano, Satoshi
    Mizumachi, Takatsugu
    Mori, Takashi
    Nishioka, Kentaro
    Shido, Motoyasu
    Katoh, Norio
    Taguchi, Hiroshi
    Fujima, Noriyuki
    Onimaru, Rikiya
    Yokota, Isao
    Kobashi, Keiji
    Shimizu, Shinichi
    Homma, Akihiro
    Shirato, Hiroki
    Aoyama, Hidefumi
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2021, 62 (02) : 329 - 337
  • [20] A model-based analysis of a simplified beam-specific dose output in proton therapy with a single-ring wobbling system
    Kase, Yuki
    Yamashita, Haruo
    Numano, Masumi
    Sakama, Makoto
    Mizota, Manabu
    Maeda, Yoshikazu
    Tameshige, Yuji
    Murayama, Shigeyuki
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 60 (01) : 359 - 374