Impact of model and dose uncertainty on model-based selection of oropharyngeal cancer patients for proton therapy

被引:33
作者
Bijman, Rik G. [1 ]
Breedveld, Sebastiaan [1 ]
Arts, Tine [1 ]
Astreinidou, Eleftheria [2 ]
de Jong, Martin A. [2 ]
Granton, Patrick V. [1 ]
Petit, Steven F. [1 ]
Hoogeman, Mischa S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, POB 5201, NL-3008 AE Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] LUMC, Dept Radiat Oncol, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
COMPLICATION PROBABILITY; SETUP UNCERTAINTIES; RADIOTHERAPY; OPTIMIZATION; HEAD; ROBUSTNESS; RANGE;
D O I
10.1080/0284186X.2017.1355113
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Proton therapy is becoming increasingly available, so it is important to apply objective and individualized patient selection to identify those who are expected to benefit most from proton therapy compared to conventional intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Comparative treatment planning using normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) evaluation has recently been proposed. This work investigates the impact of NTCP model and dose uncertainties on model-based patient selection. Material and Methods: We used IMRT and intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) treatment plans of 78 oropharyngeal cancer patients, which were generated based on automated treatment planning and evaluated based on three published NTCP models. A reduction in NTCP of more than a certain threshold (e.g. 10% lower NTCP) leads to patient selection for IMPT, referred to as 'nominal' selection. To simulate the effect of uncertainties in NTCP-model coefficients (based on reported confidence intervals) and planned doses on the accuracy of model-based patient selection, the Monte Carlo method was used to sample NTCP-model coefficients and doses from a probability distribution centered at their nominal values. Patient selection accuracy within a certain sample was defined as the fraction of patients which had similar selection in both the 'nominal' and 'sampled' scenario. Results: For all three NTCP models, the median patient selection accuracy was found to be above 70% when only NTCP-model uncertainty was considered. Selection accuracy decreased with increasing uncertainty resulting from differences between planned and delivered dose. In case of excessive dose uncertainty, selection accuracy decreased to 60%. Conclusion: Model and dose uncertainty highly influence the accuracy of model-based patient selection for proton therapy. A reduction of NTCP-model uncertainty is necessary to reach more accurate model-based patient selection.
引用
收藏
页码:1444 / 1450
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Agresti Alan., 2009, Statistical methods for the social sciences: With SPSS from A to Z: A brief step-by-step manual, V4th ed
[2]   EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF SPOT SCANNING PROTON RADIATION THERAPY FOR CHORDOMAS AND CHONDROSARCOMAS OF THE SKULL BASE: FIRST LONG-TERM REPORT [J].
Ares, Carmen ;
Hug, Eugen B. ;
Lomax, Antony J. ;
Bolsi, Alessandra ;
Timmermann, Beate ;
Rutz, Hans Peter ;
Schuller, Jan C. ;
Pedroni, Eros ;
Goitein, Gudrun .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 75 (04) :1111-1118
[3]   Adequate margins for random setup uncertainties in head-and-neck IMRT [J].
Astreinidou, E ;
Bel, A ;
Raaijmakers, CPJ ;
Terhaard, CHJ ;
Lagendijk, JJW .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 61 (03) :938-944
[4]   Toward a model-based patient selection strategy for proton therapy: External validation of photon-derived normal tissue complication probability models in a head and neck proton therapy cohort [J].
Blanchard, Pierre ;
Wong, Andrew J. ;
Gunn, G. Brandon ;
Garden, Adam S. ;
Mohamed, Abdallah S. R. ;
Rosenthal, David I. ;
Crutison, Joseph ;
Wu, Richard ;
Zhang, Xiaodong ;
Zhu, X. Ronald ;
Mohan, Radhe ;
Amin, Mayankkumar V. ;
Fuller, C. David ;
Frank, Steven J. .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 121 (03) :381-386
[5]   iCycle: Integrated, multicriterial beam angle, and profile optimization for generation of coplanar and noncoplanar IMRT plans [J].
Breedveld, Sebastiaan ;
Storchi, Pascal R. M. ;
Voet, Peter W. J. ;
Heijmen, Ben J. M. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (02) :951-963
[6]   The equivalence of multi-criteria methods for radiotherapy plan optimization [J].
Breedveld, Sebastiaan ;
Storchi, Pascal R. M. ;
Heijmen, Ben J. M. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2009, 54 (23) :7199-7209
[7]   Predictive modelling for swallowing dysfunction after primary (chemo)radiation: Results of a prospective observational study [J].
Christianen, Miranda E. M. C. ;
Schilstra, Cornelis ;
Beetz, Ivo ;
Muijs, Christina T. ;
Chouvalova, Olga ;
Burlage, Fred R. ;
Doornaert, Patricia ;
Koken, Phil W. ;
Leemans, C. Rene ;
Rinkel, Rico N. P. M. ;
de Bruijn, Marieke J. ;
de Bock, G. H. ;
Roodenburg, Jan L. N. ;
van der Laan, Bernard F. A. M. ;
Slotman, Ben J. ;
Verdonck-de Leeuw, Irma M. ;
Bijl, Hendrik P. ;
Langendijk, Johannes A. .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2012, 105 (01) :107-114
[8]   Using a knowledge-based planning solution to select patients for proton therapy [J].
Delaney, Alexander R. ;
Dahele, Max ;
Tol, Jim P. ;
Kuijper, Ingrid T. ;
Slotman, Ben J. ;
Verbakel, Wilko F. A. R. .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2017, 124 (02) :263-270
[9]   PAROTID GLAND FUNCTION AFTER RADIOTHERAPY: THE COMBINED MICHIGAN AND UTRECHT EXPERIENCE [J].
Dijkema, Tim ;
Raaijmakers, Cornelis P. J. ;
Ten Haken, Randall K. ;
Roesink, Judith M. ;
Braam, Petra M. ;
Houweling, Anette C. ;
Moerland, Marinus A. ;
Eisbruch, Avraham ;
Terhaard, Chris H. J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 78 (02) :449-453
[10]   An introduction to ROC analysis [J].
Fawcett, Tom .
PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS, 2006, 27 (08) :861-874