Immunomodulating effects of probiotics for microbiota modulation, gut health and disease resistance in pigs

被引:69
作者
Roselli, Marianna [1 ]
Pieper, Robert [2 ]
Rogel-Gaillard, Claire [3 ]
de Vries, Hugo [4 ]
Bailey, Mick [5 ]
Smidt, Hauke [4 ]
Lauridsen, Charlotte [6 ]
机构
[1] Council Agr Res & Econ, Food & Nutr Res Ctr, Via Ardeatina 546, I-00178 Rome, Italy
[2] Free Univ Berlin, Inst Anim Nutr, Dept Vet Med, Konigin Luise Str 49, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
[3] Univ Paris Saclay, GABI, INRA, AgroParisTech, F-78350 Jouy En Josas, France
[4] Wageningen Univ & Res, Lab Microbiol, Stippeneng 4, NL-6708 WE Wageningen, Netherlands
[5] Univ Bristol, Sch Vet Sci, Bristol BS8 1TH, Avon, England
[6] Aarhus Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Blithers Alle 20, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
关键词
Probiotics; Prebiotics; Immunomodulation; Pig diarrhea prevention; Gut microbiota; Gut health; CEREUS-VAR; TOYOI; INTESTINAL EPITHELIAL-CELLS; ENTEROTOXIGENIC ESCHERICHIA-COLI; ENTERICA SEROVAR TYPHIMURIUM; ENTEROCOCCUS-FAECIUM STRAIN; FATTY-ACID CONCENTRATIONS; LACTOBACILLUS-REUTERI; DIETARY SUPPLEMENTATION; IN-VITRO; NCIMB; 10415;
D O I
10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2017.07.011
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Probiotics are live microorganisms that can confer a health benefit on the host, and amongst various mechanisms probiotics are believed to exert their effects by production of antimicrobial substances, competition with pathogens for adhesion sites and nutrients, enhancement of mucosal barrier integrity and immune modulation. Through these activities probiotics can support three core benefits for the host: supporting a healthy gut microbiota, a healthy digestive tract and a healthy immune system. More recently, the concept of combining probiotics and prebiotics, i.e. synbiotics, for the beneficial effect on gut health of pigs has attracted major interest, and examples of probiotic and prebiotic benefits for pigs are pathogen inhibition and immunomodulation. Yet, it remains to be defined in pigs, what exactly is a healthy gut. Because of the high level of variability in growth and feed conversion between individual pigs in commercial production systems, measuring the impact of probiotics on gut health defined by improvements in overall productivity requires large experiments. For this reason, many studies have concentrated on measuring the effects of the feed additives on proxies of gut health including many immunological measures, in more controlled experiments. With the major focus of studying the balance between gut microbiology, immunology and physiology, and the potential for prevention of intestinal disorders in pigs, we therefore performed a literature review of the immunomodulatory effects of probiotics, either alone or in combination with prebiotics, based on in vivo, in vitro and ex vivo porcine experiments. A consistent number of studies showed the potential capacity in terms of immunomodulatory activities of these feed additives in pigs, but contrasting results can also be obtained from the literature. Reasons for this are not clear but could be related to differences with respect to the probiotic strain used, experimental settings, diets, initial microbiota colonization, administration route, time and frequency of administration of the pro biotic strain and sampling for analysis. Hence, the use of proxy measurements of enteric health based on observable immunological parameters presents significant problems at the moment, and cannot be considered robust, reliable predictors of the probiotic activity in vivo, in relation to pig gut health. In conclusion, more detailed understanding of how to select and interpret these proxy measurements will be necessary in order to allow a more rational prediction of the effect of specific probiotic interventions in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:104 / 119
页数:16
相关论文
共 156 条
[51]   The impact of feed additives on the microbial ecology of the gut in young pigs [J].
Jensen, BB .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL AND FEED SCIENCES, 1998, 7 :45-64
[52]   Description of Bacillus toyonensis sp nov., a novel species of the Bacillus cereus group, and pairwise genome comparisons of the species of the group by means of ANI calculations [J].
Jimenez, Guillermo ;
Urdiain, Mercedes ;
Cifuentes, Ana ;
Lopez-Lopez, Aranzazu ;
Blanch, Anicet R. ;
Tamames, Javier ;
Kaempfer, Peter ;
Kolsto, Anne-Brit ;
Ramon, Daniel ;
Martinez, Juan F. ;
Codoner, Francisco M. ;
Rossello-Mora, Ramon .
SYSTEMATIC AND APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2013, 36 (06) :383-391
[53]  
KAEFFER B, 1993, EUR J CELL BIOL, V62, P152
[54]  
Kirchgessner M, 1993, Arch Tierernahr, V44, P111, DOI 10.1080/17450399309386062
[55]   Role of F1C Fimbriae, Flagella, and Secreted Bacterial Components in the Inhibitory Effect of Probiotic Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 on Atypical Enteropathogenic E-coli Infection [J].
Kleta, Sylvia ;
Nordhoff, Marcel ;
Tedin, Karsten ;
Wieler, Lothar H. ;
Kolenda, Rafal ;
Oswald, Sibylle ;
Oelschlaeger, Tobias A. ;
Bleiss, Wilfried ;
Schieracka, Peter .
INFECTION AND IMMUNITY, 2014, 82 (05) :1801-1812
[56]   Enterococcus faecium NCIMB 10415 Modulates Epithelial Integrity, Heat Shock Protein, and Proinflammatory Cytokine Response in Intestinal Cells [J].
Klingspor, Shanti ;
Bondzio, Angelika ;
Martens, Holger ;
Aschenbach, Joerg R. ;
Bratz, Katharina ;
Tedin, Karsten ;
Einspanier, Ralf ;
Lodemann, Ulrike .
MEDIATORS OF INFLAMMATION, 2015, 2015
[57]   Synbiotics in Health and Disease [J].
Kolida, Sofia ;
Gibson, Glenn R. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, VOL 2, 2011, 2 :373-393
[58]   Feeding of Lactobacillus sobrius reduces Escherichia coli F4 levels in the gut and promotes growth of infected piglets [J].
Konstantinov, Sergey R. ;
Smidt, Hauke ;
Akkermans, Antoon D. L. ;
Casini, Luisa ;
Trevisi, Paolo ;
Mazzoni, Maurizio ;
De Filippi, Sara ;
Bosi, Paolo ;
de Vos, Willem M. .
FEMS MICROBIOLOGY ECOLOGY, 2008, 66 (03) :599-607
[59]   Lactobacillus sobrius sp nov., abundant in the intestine of weaning piglets [J].
Konstantinov, SR ;
Poznanski, E ;
Fuentes, S ;
Akkermans, ADL ;
Smidt, H ;
de Vos, WM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2006, 56 :29-32
[60]   Response of Nursery Pigs to a Synbiotic Preparation of Starch and an Anti-Escherichia coli K88 Probiotic [J].
Krause, D. O. ;
Bhandari, S. K. ;
House, J. D. ;
Nyachoti, C. M. .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2010, 76 (24) :8192-8200