The applicability of robustness measures to water resources decision making

被引:0
|
作者
Hyde, KM [1 ]
Maier, HR [1 ]
Colby, CB [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Ctr Appl Modelling Water Engn, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
来源
MODSIM 2003: INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON MODELLING AND SIMULATION, VOLS 1-4: VOL 1: NATURAL SYSTEMS, PT 1; VOL 2: NATURAL SYSTEMS, PT 2; VOL 3: SOCIO-ECONOMIC SYSTEMS; VOL 4: GENERAL SYSTEMS | 2003年
关键词
multi-criteria decision making; robustness; uncertainty; water resources;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The choice among alternative water supply sources is generally based on the fundamental objective of cost minimisation. There is, however, a need to consider sustainability, the environment and social implications in regional water resources planning, in addition to economics. In order to achieve this, multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) techniques can be used. There are a large number of MCDA methods, however, none of them can be considered as appropriate for all decision-making situations. Selection of the most suitable method can therefore be difficult. Various sources of uncertainty exist in the application of MCDA methods including the definition of criteria weights and the assignment of criteria performance values. Robustness / sensitivity analysis can be used to analyse the effects of these uncertainties and in this paper, two existing methods are applied to two water resources case studies. The results indicate that consideration of the various sources of uncertainty should be an integral part of the decision-making process. However, the existing methods could be improved by enabling concurrent alteration of the subjective input values and the method should also be applicable to a range of MCDA techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:1639 / 1644
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] From science to decision-making: The applicability of Bayesian methods to risk assessment
    Hill, RA
    HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 1996, 2 (04): : 636 - 642
  • [42] Integrations of Continuous Hesitant Fuzzy Information in Group Decision Making With a Case Study of Water Resources Emergency Management
    Zhang, Shen
    Xu, Zeshui
    Zeng, Xiao-Jun
    Yan, Xin
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 146134 - 146144
  • [43] Eye tracking measures of uncertainty during perceptual decision making
    Brunye, Tad T.
    Gardony, Aaron L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2017, 120 : 60 - 68
  • [44] Using fuzzy operators to address the complexity in decision making of water resources redistribution in two neighboring river basins
    Chen, Ho-Wen
    Chang, Ni-Bin
    ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2010, 33 (06) : 652 - 666
  • [45] Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Models for Assessment of Education Quality in Water Resources Engineering
    Ghorbani, Mohammad Kazem
    Talebbeydokhti, Nasser
    Hamidifar, Hossein
    Samadi, Mehrshad
    Nones, Michael
    Rezaeitavabe, Fatemeh
    Heidarifar, Shabnam
    ALGORITHMS, 2025, 18 (01)
  • [46] Evaluating robustness of waste load allocation under climate change using multi-objective decision making
    Meysami, Rojin
    Niksokhan, Mohammad Hossein
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2020, 588
  • [47] Multi-criteria decision making based on relative measures
    Meimei Xia
    Jian Chen
    Juliang Zhang
    Annals of Operations Research, 2015, 229 : 791 - 811
  • [48] General Decision Support System for Water Resources Management
    Havn, Karsten
    Sorensen, Henrik Refstrup
    PROCEEDING OF THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL YELLOW RIVER FORUM ON ENSURING WATER RIGHT OF THE RIVER'S DEMAND AND HEALTHY RIVER BASIN MAINTENANCE, VOL I, 2015, : 106 - 113
  • [49] Effect of GCM credibility on water resource system robustness under climate change based on decision scaling
    Zhang, Ruikang
    Cheng, Lei
    Liu, Pan
    Huang, Kangdi
    Gong, Yu
    Qin, Shujing
    Liu, Dedi
    ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2021, 158
  • [50] Multicriteria decision-making based on distance measures and knowledge measures of Fermatean fuzzy sets
    Ganie, Abdul Haseeb
    GRANULAR COMPUTING, 2022, 7 (04) : 979 - 998