The applicability of robustness measures to water resources decision making

被引:0
|
作者
Hyde, KM [1 ]
Maier, HR [1 ]
Colby, CB [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Ctr Appl Modelling Water Engn, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
来源
MODSIM 2003: INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON MODELLING AND SIMULATION, VOLS 1-4: VOL 1: NATURAL SYSTEMS, PT 1; VOL 2: NATURAL SYSTEMS, PT 2; VOL 3: SOCIO-ECONOMIC SYSTEMS; VOL 4: GENERAL SYSTEMS | 2003年
关键词
multi-criteria decision making; robustness; uncertainty; water resources;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The choice among alternative water supply sources is generally based on the fundamental objective of cost minimisation. There is, however, a need to consider sustainability, the environment and social implications in regional water resources planning, in addition to economics. In order to achieve this, multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) techniques can be used. There are a large number of MCDA methods, however, none of them can be considered as appropriate for all decision-making situations. Selection of the most suitable method can therefore be difficult. Various sources of uncertainty exist in the application of MCDA methods including the definition of criteria weights and the assignment of criteria performance values. Robustness / sensitivity analysis can be used to analyse the effects of these uncertainties and in this paper, two existing methods are applied to two water resources case studies. The results indicate that consideration of the various sources of uncertainty should be an integral part of the decision-making process. However, the existing methods could be improved by enabling concurrent alteration of the subjective input values and the method should also be applicable to a range of MCDA techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:1639 / 1644
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Science and decision making for water resources
    Policansky, D
    ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 1998, 8 (03) : 610 - 618
  • [2] Robust decision making and Epoch-Era analysis: A comparison of two robustness frameworks for decision-making under uncertainty
    Moallemi, Enayat A.
    Elsawah, Sondoss
    Ryan, Michael J.
    TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2020, 151
  • [3] Optimal Utilization Simulation and Decision Making on Water Resources System
    Xue Lianqing
    Li Yongkun
    Fan Zhenghang
    Li Jieyou
    2011 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, VOL 12, PT B, 2012, 12 : 1097 - 1103
  • [4] Optimal Utilization Simulation and Decision Making on Water Resources System
    Xue Lianqing
    Li Yongkun
    Fan Zhenghang
    Li Jieyou
    2011 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS AND NEURAL COMPUTING (FSNC 2011), VOL II, 2011, : 521 - 524
  • [5] Study on the Robustness of Emergency Decision making
    Zhang, Yunlong
    Liu, Mao
    Shi, Jie
    THEORY AND PRACTICE OF RISK ANALYSIS AND CRISIS RESPONSE, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 93 - 98
  • [6] A new methodology for water resources multicriteria decision making under uncertainty
    Simonovic, Slobodan P.
    Verma, Rakesh
    PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF THE EARTH, 2008, 33 (05) : 322 - 329
  • [7] Group decision making on water resources based on analysis of individual rankings
    Morais, Danielle C.
    de Almeida, Adiel Teixeira
    OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2012, 40 (01): : 42 - 52
  • [8] A distance-based uncertainty analysis approach to multi-criteria decision analysis for water resource decision making
    Hyde, KM
    Maier, HR
    Colby, CB
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2005, 77 (04) : 278 - 290
  • [9] Reasoned Decision Making Without Math? Adaptability and Robustness in Response to Surprise
    Smithson, Michael
    Ben-Haim, Yakov
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2015, 35 (10) : 1911 - 1918
  • [10] Linking Hydrological Uncertainty with Equitable Allocation for Water Resources Decision-Making
    Pienaar, G. W.
    Hughes, D. A.
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2017, 31 (01) : 269 - 282