Toward an Ecological Theory of the Norms of Practical Deliberation

被引:16
作者
Morton, Jennifer M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Swarthmore Coll, Dept Philosophy, Swarthmore, PA 19081 USA
关键词
HEURISTICS; RATIONALITY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-0378.2010.00400.x
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
Practical deliberation is deliberation concerning what to do governed by norms on intention (e.g. means-end coherence and consistency), which are taken to be a mark of rational deliberation. According to the theory of practical deliberation I develop in this paper we should think of the norms of rational practical deliberation ecologically: that is, the norms that constitute rational practical deliberation depend on the complex interaction between the psychological capacities of the agent in question and the agent's environment. I argue that this view does a better job of justifying particular norms for practical deliberation than intrinsic or constitutivist theories. Finally, I argue against the Myth Theory of deliberation, which takes there to be no such norms on deliberation.
引用
收藏
页码:561 / 584
页数:24
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Ainslie G., 2001, BREAKDOWN WILL
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1987, Reasons and persons
  • [3] Bratman M.E., 2009, Spheres of reason: new essays in the philosophy of normativity
  • [4] Bratman Michael., 1987, Intention, Plans, and
  • [5] Setiya on Intention, Rationality and Reasons
    Bratman, Michael E.
    [J]. ANALYSIS, 2009, 69 (03) : 510 - 521
  • [6] Bratman MichaelE., 1999, FACES INTENTION
  • [7] BROOME J., 2009, SPHERES REASON
  • [8] Wide or narrow scope?
    Broome, John
    [J]. MIND, 2007, 116 (462) : 359 - 370
  • [9] Is rationality normative?
    Broome, John
    [J]. DISPUTATIO-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2007, 2 (23): : 161 - 178
  • [10] Broome John., 2001, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary, V75, P175