The effect of phonological neighborhood density on vowel articulation

被引:177
作者
Munson, B
Solomon, NP
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Dept Speech Language Hearing Sci, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Walter Reed Army Med Ctr, Washington, DC 20307 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH | 2004年 / 47卷 / 05期
关键词
phonological neighborhood density; word frequency; vowels; acoustic measurements; adults;
D O I
10.1044/1092-4388(2004/078)
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Recent literature suggests that Phonological neighborhood density and word frequency can affect speech production, in addition to the well-documented effects that they have on speech perception. This article describes 2 experiments that examined how phonological neighborhood density influences the durations and formant frequencies of adults' productions of vowels in real words. In Experiment 1, 10 normal speakers produced words that covaried in phonological neighborhood density and word frequency. Infrequent words with many phonological neighbors were produced with shorter durations and more expanded vowel spaces than frequent words with few phonological neighbors. Results of this experiment confirmed that this effect was not related to the duration of the vowels constituting the high- and low-density words. In Experiment 2, 15 adults produced words that varied in both word frequency and neighborhood density. Neighborhood density affected vowel articulation in both high- and low-frequency words. Moreover, frequent words were produced with more contracted vowel spaces than infrequent words. There was no interaction between these factors, and the vowel duration did not vary as a function of neighborhood density. Taken together, the results suggest that neighborhood density affects vowel production independent of word frequency and vowel duration.
引用
收藏
页码:1048 / 1058
页数:11
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
*AM NAT STAND I, 1989, SPEC AUD
[2]   Effects of disfluencies, predictability, and utterance position on word form variation in English conversation [J].
Bell, A ;
Jurafsky, D ;
Fosler-Lussier, E ;
Girand, C ;
Gregory, M ;
Gildea, D .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2003, 113 (02) :1001-1024
[3]  
BOERSMAN P, 2002, PRAAT VERSION 4 0 7
[4]  
Bradlow AR, 2002, PHONOL PHONET, V4-1, P241
[5]   Intelligibility of normal speech .1. Global and fine-grained acoustic-phonetic talker characteristics [J].
Bradlow, AR ;
Torretta, GM ;
Pisoni, DB .
SPEECH COMMUNICATION, 1996, 20 (3-4) :255-272
[6]  
Bybee J., 2000, PAPERS LAB PHONOLOGY, P250, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780195301571.003.0010
[7]  
Bybee JoanL., 2001, Phonology and language use
[8]   AN ACOUSTIC STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF TEMPO AND STRESS ON SEGMENTAL INTERVALS IN MODERN GREEK [J].
FOURAKIS, M .
PHONETICA, 1986, 43 (04) :172-188
[9]  
GOLDINGER SD, 2000, P SWAP SPOK WORD ACC, P155
[10]   ACOUSTIC CHARACTERISTICS OF AMERICAN ENGLISH VOWELS [J].
HILLENBRAND, J ;
GETTY, LA ;
CLARK, MJ ;
WHEELER, K .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1995, 97 (05) :3099-3111