Autonomous Maneuver Targeting Around Small Bodies Using Continuous-Thrust Propulsion

被引:3
作者
Kuettel, Donald H. H. [1 ]
McMahon, Jay W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Orbital Res Cluster Celestial Applicat, Smead Dept Aerosp Engn, Boulder, CO 80303 USA
关键词
Thrust; Propulsion System; Optimal Impulsive Maneuvers; Broyden Fletcher Goldfarb Shanno; Guidance Laws; Asteroids; Lambert Algorithm; Spacecraft Trajectories; Sparse Nonlinear Optimizer; Algorithms Convergence; MODEL-PREDICTIVE CONTROL; SPACECRAFT PROXIMITY; GUIDANCE; OPTIMIZATION; DOCKING; NAVIGATION;
D O I
10.2514/1.G006213
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
This paper presents a novel fuel-efficient continuous-thrust maneuver targeting (CTMT) algorithm that is capable of planning finite, continuous maneuvers in a larger autonomous spacecraft guidance architecture. This is accomplished using a constant-thrust bilinear tangent guidance law in conjunction with an optimal Lambert algorithm and a Newton-Raphson predictor-corrector targeting scheme. This simple approach is capable of planning a plethora of different free-time and fixed-time single-burn, burn-coast intercept, or burn-coast-burn bilinear tangent maneuvers from an initial state/orbit to a desired state/orbit. For the study case of asteroid Bennu, when used with thrust levels that are greater than 5% of the surface acceleration of asteroid Bennu, the CTMT algorithm is able to converge on 99% of orbital transfers initiated from a circular, 1.5 km, terminator orbit. Furthermore, many of the continuous-thrust maneuvers calculated by the CTMT algorithm are the optimal constant-thrust trajectories between two states in the small-body dynamical environment, and they are able to be calculated hundreds of times faster with the CTMT algorithm than with state-of-the-art nonlinear optimization algorithms. Ultimately, the CTMT algorithm shows promise as a candidate for future autonomous guidance applications.
引用
收藏
页码:499 / 516
页数:18
相关论文
共 42 条
[31]   Laboratory experimentation of autonomous spacecraft approach and docking to a collaborative target [J].
Romano, Marcello ;
Friedman, David A. ;
Shay, Tracy J. .
JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, 2007, 44 (01) :164-173
[32]   Adaptive Fuzzy Control of Spacecraft Proximity Operations Using Hierarchical Fuzzy Systems [J].
Sun, Liang ;
Huo, Wei .
IEEE-ASME TRANSACTIONS ON MECHATRONICS, 2016, 21 (03) :1629-1640
[33]   The Rosetta mission orbiter science overview: the comet phase [J].
Taylor, M. G. G. T. ;
Altobelli, N. ;
Buratti, B. J. ;
Choukroun, M. .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2017, 375 (2097)
[34]  
Vallado DavidA., 2001, FUNDAMENTALS ASTRODY, P538
[35]   Experimental evaluation of model predictive control and inverse dynamics control for spacecraft proximity and docking maneuvers [J].
Virgili-Llop J. ;
Zagaris C. ;
Park H. ;
Zappulla R., II ;
Romano M. .
CEAS Space Journal, 2018, 10 (1) :37-49
[36]  
von Stryk O., 1992, Annals of Operations Research, V37, P357, DOI 10.1007/BF02071065
[37]   A SET OF MODIFIED EQUINOCTIAL ORBIT ELEMENTS [J].
WALKER, MJH ;
IRELAND, B ;
OWENS, J .
CELESTIAL MECHANICS, 1985, 36 (04) :409-419
[38]  
Wang J., 2018, 2018 AIAA GUID NAV C, DOI 10.2514/6.2018-1871
[39]  
Well K., 2001, AIAA GUID NAV CONTR, DOI [10.2514/6.2001-4047, DOI 10.2514/6.2001-4047]
[40]   Real-Time Autonomous Spacecraft Proximity Maneuvers and Docking Using an Adaptive Artificial Potential Field Approach [J].
Zappulla, Richard, II ;
Park, Hyeongjun ;
Virgili-Llop, Josep ;
Romano, Marcello .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 27 (06) :2598-2605