Transplantation With Kidney Paired Donation to Increase the Donor Pool: A Single-Center Experience

被引:9
作者
Gumber, M. R. [1 ]
Kute, V. B. [1 ]
Goplani, K. R. [1 ]
Shah, P. R. [1 ]
Patel, H. V. [1 ]
Vanikar, A. V.
Pandya, T. P. [1 ]
Trivedi, H. L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Smt Gulabben Rasiklal Doshi & Smt Kamlaben Mafatl, Dept Nephrol & Clini Transplantat, Dr HL Trivedi Inst Transplantat Sci ITS, Ahmadabad 380016, Gujarat, India
关键词
RENAL-TRANSPLANTATION; EXCHANGE; QUALITY; PROGRAM; LIFE;
D O I
10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.02.016
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. A living either related or unrelated donor transplant leads to a better outcome in terms of patient and graft survivals compared with one from a deceased donor. Desensitization protocols are expensive and labor intensive. The use of unrelated living donors has the greatest potential to increase the number of donors in the future, when no willing living donor is available due to blood group and/or human leukocyte antigen incompatibility. Herein, we have reported our results with a living donor exchange program. Aims. To determine the feasibility and effectiveness of kidney paired donation (KPD) to manage patients with incompatible donors as well as present patient and graft survivals, serum creatinine (S.Cr) levels, and rejection episodes. Results. Between June 2000 and December 2009, we performed KPD transplants in 36 recipients to avoid blood group incompatibility (n = 28) or to avoid a positive crossmatch (n = 8). At a median follow-up of 27.7 months (range, 5.83-119.8). The patient survival rate was 88.9% and the graft survival rate was 94.4%. Four patients developed acute cellular rejection episodes (11.1%) and 3 (8.3%) acute antibody-mediated rejection. At 1, 3, and 5 years, the mean S.Cr values were 1.42 +/- 0.28 mg% (n = 28) 1.61 +/- 0.51 (n = 22) and 1.24 +/- 0.15 (n = 8), respectively. Conclusions. The incidence of acute rejection episodes and patient/graft survivals were acceptable in our KPD program. The use of unrelated living donors has great potential to increase the number of donors in the future; a national KPD program should be encouraged in India.
引用
收藏
页码:1412 / 1414
页数:3
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Evolution of renal transplantation in India over the last four decades [J].
Abraham, Georgi ;
John, George T. ;
Sunil, Shroff ;
Fernando, Edwin M. ;
Reddy, Yogesh N. V. .
CLINICAL KIDNEY JOURNAL, 2010, 3 (02) :203-207
[2]   Commerce in transplantation in Third World countries [J].
Chugh, KS ;
Jha, V .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1996, 49 (05) :1181-1186
[3]  
Chugh KS, 2009, AM JO KIDNEY DIS, V54
[4]  
de Klerk M, 2008, FRONT BIOSCI, V13, P3373
[5]   THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF PATIENTS WITH END-STAGE RENAL-DISEASE [J].
EVANS, RW ;
MANNINEN, DL ;
GARRISON, LP ;
HART, LG ;
BLAGG, CR ;
GUTMAN, RA ;
HULL, AR ;
LOWRIE, EG .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1985, 312 (09) :553-559
[6]   Cadaveric renal transplantation: Our experience at the Institute of Kidney Diseases & Research Centre, Institute of Transplantation Sciences, Ahmedabad [J].
Feroz, A. ;
Dabhi, M. ;
Gumber, M. ;
Gupta, S. ;
Shah, P. R. ;
Rizvi, S. J. ;
Modi, P. R. ;
Shah, S. A. ;
Khemchandani, S. ;
Bhandari, N. S. ;
Bhosale, G. P. ;
Shah, V. R. ;
Trivedi, V. B. ;
Dave, A. P. ;
Dave, J. M. ;
Trivedi, H. L. .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 39 (03) :721-722
[7]   Increased rejection in living unrelated versus living related kidney transplants does not affect short-term function and survival [J].
Fuller, TF ;
Feng, S ;
Brennan, TV ;
Tomlanovich, S ;
Bostrom, A ;
Freise, CE .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 78 (07) :1030-1035
[8]   Living unrelated donor kidney transplantation [J].
Gjertson, DW ;
Cecka, JM .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 58 (02) :491-499
[9]  
Kranenburg LW, 2006, AM J TRANSPLANT S2, V6, P629
[10]   Exchange-donor program in renal transplantation: A single-center experience [J].
Kwak, JY ;
Kwon, OJ ;
Lee, KS ;
Kang, CM ;
Park, HY ;
Kim, JH .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1999, 31 (1-2) :344-345