Performance of Conventionally Reinforced Coupling Beams Subjected to Cyclic Loading

被引:41
作者
Brena, Sergio F. [1 ]
Ihtiyar, Onur [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
[2] Thornton Tomasetti, New York, NY 10010 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING-ASCE | 2011年 / 137卷 / 06期
关键词
Concrete coupling beams; Evaluation techniques; Hysteresis; Seismic analysis; Seismic tests;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000316
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The behavior of coupled-wall buildings primarily depends on the performance of coupling beams. Existing coupled-wall buildings designed and built prior to the 1970s contain coupling beams reinforced with horizontal and vertical bars. Seismic evaluation of these older buildings is commonly performed using nonlinear static or dynamic analyses techniques. Results from nonlinear analyses depend on the quality of backbone curves that characterize the behavior of the individual coupling beams. Backbone curve construction must, therefore, focus on reliable estimates of the strength and deformation values used to characterize the behavior of the structural component. This paper presents experimental results of four conventionally reinforced coupling beams designed to exhibit different behavior modes during cyclic loading. The effect of different amounts of longitudinal and transverse reinforcement on behavior is highlighted. The measured shear strength of the beams is compared with values calculated using existing equations. The deformation components that contributed to chord rotation are identified and discussed in light of response parameters, such as measured strains and observed cracking. The tests also highlight the importance of accounting for reduction in shear stiffness to accurately determine the deformation response of coupling beams. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000316. (C) 2011 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页码:665 / 676
页数:12
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
ACI 318, 2008, 31808 ACI, P430
[2]  
*ASCE, 2006, 4106 ASCESEI, P416
[3]  
*ATC, 1999, 306 ATC FEMA, P250
[4]  
BARNEY GB, 1978, RES DEV SERIES, V1583, P152
[5]  
*FIB, 2003, FIB B, V24, P306
[6]  
He L., 1992, SEISMIC BEHAV FLANGE
[7]  
IHTIYAR O, 2006, P 8 NAT C EARTHQ ENG, P10
[8]  
Paulay T., 1971, J STRUCT ENG, V97, P843, DOI DOI 10.1061/JSDEAG.0002848
[9]  
Tassios TP, 1996, ACI STRUCT J, V93, P711