Comparison of Repeat Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in Case of Weight Loss Failure After Sleeve Gastrectomy

被引:19
作者
Antonopulos, Christos [1 ,2 ]
Rebibo, Lionel [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Calabrese, Daniela [5 ]
Ribeiro-Parenti, Lara [1 ]
Arapis, Konstantinos [1 ]
Dhahri, Abdennaceur [4 ]
Coupaye, Muriel [6 ]
Hansel, Boris [7 ]
Marmuse, Jean-Pierre [1 ]
Regimbeau, Jean-Marc [3 ,4 ]
Msika, Simon [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Bichat Claude Bernard Univ Hosp, Dept Digest Esogastr & Bariatr Surg, 46 Rue Henri Huchard, F-75018 Paris, France
[2] Univ G dAnnunzio, Dept Med & Oral Sci & Biotechnol, Via Vestini 31, I-66100 Chieti, Italy
[3] Univ Picardie Jules Verne, SSPC Clin Res Unit, F-80054 Amiens 01, France
[4] Amiens Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Digest Surg, Ave Rene Laennec, F-80054 Amiens 01, France
[5] Louis Mourier Univ Hosp, Dept Digest & Gen Surg, 178 Rue Renouillers, F-92700 Colombes, France
[6] Louis Mourier Hosp, Explorat Fonct Dept, 178 Rue Renouillers, F-92700 Colombes, France
[7] Bichat Claude Bernard Univ Hosp, Dept Diabet & Nutr, 46 rue Henri Huchard, F-75018 Paris, France
关键词
Sleeve gastrectomy; Revisional surgery; Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; Repeat sleeve gastrectomy; Weight loss; Outcomes; BARIATRIC SURGERY; CONVERSION; OUTCOMES; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s11695-019-04123-9
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Few series are available on the results of repeat sleeve gastrectomy (re-SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) performed to manage the failure of primary sleeve gastrectomy (SG). The objective of this study was to compare the short- and medium-term outcomes of re-SG and RYGB after SG. Material & Methods Between January 2010 and December 2017, patients undergoing re-SG (n = 61) and RYGB (n = 83) for failure of primary SG were included in this study. Revisional surgery was proposed for patients with insufficient excess weight loss (EWL <= 50%) or weight regain. The primary endpoint was the comparison of weight loss in the re-SG group and the RYGB group at the 1-year follow-up. The secondary endpoints were overall mortality and morbidity, specific morbidity, length of stay, weight loss, and correction of comorbidities. Results The mean interval between SG and re-SG was 41.5 vs. 43.2 months between SG and RYGB (p = 0.32). The mean operative time was 103 min (re-SG group) vs. 129.4 min (RYGB group). One death (1.7%; re-SG group) and 25 complications (17.4%; 9 in the re-SG group, 16 in the RYGB group) were observed. At the 1 year, mean body mass index was 31.6 in the re-SG group and 32.5 in the RYGB group (p = 0.61) and excess weight loss was 69.5 vs. 61.2, respectively (p = 0.05). Conclusion Re-SG and RYGB as revisional surgery for SG are feasible with acceptable outcomes and similar results on weight loss on the first postoperative year.
引用
收藏
页码:3919 / 3927
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Approach to Poor Weight Loss After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Re-sleeve Vs. Gastric Bypass [J].
AlSabah, Salman ;
Alsharqawi, Nourah ;
Almulla, Ahmed ;
Akrof, Shehab ;
Alenezi, Khaled ;
Buhaimed, Waleed ;
Al-Subaie, Saud ;
Al Haddad, Mohanned .
OBESITY SURGERY, 2016, 26 (10) :2302-2307
[2]   Long-term (11+years) outcomes in weight, patient satisfaction, comorbidities, and gastroesophageal reflux treatment after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy [J].
Arman, Gustavo A. ;
Himpens, Jacques ;
Dhaenens, Jeroen ;
Ballet, Thierry ;
Vilallonga, Ramon ;
Leman, Guido .
SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2016, 12 (10) :1778-1786
[3]   Mid-Term Results and Responsiveness Predictors After Two-Step Single-Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Bypass with Sleeve Gastrectomy [J].
Balibrea, Jose M. ;
Vilallonga, Ramon ;
Hidalgo, Marta ;
Ciudin, Andreea ;
Gonzalez, Oscar ;
Caubet, Enric ;
Sanchez-Pernaute, Andres ;
Fort, Jose M. ;
Armengol-Carrasco, Manel .
OBESITY SURGERY, 2017, 27 (05) :1302-1308
[4]   Re-sleeve gastrectomy [J].
Baltasar, Aniceto ;
Serra, Carlos ;
Perez, Nieves ;
Bou, Rafael ;
Bengochea, Marcelo .
OBESITY SURGERY, 2006, 16 (11) :1535-1538
[5]   Systematic review of sleeve gastrectomy as staging and primary bariatric procedure [J].
Brethauer, Stacy A. ;
Hammel, Jeffrey P. ;
Schauer, Philip R. .
SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2009, 5 (04) :469-475
[6]   Revisional single-anastomosis gastric bypass for a failed restrictive procedure: 5-year results [J].
Bruzzi, Matthieu ;
Voron, Thibault ;
Zinzindohoue, Franck ;
Berger, Anne ;
Douard, Richard ;
Chevallier, Jean-Marc .
SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2016, 12 (02) :240-245
[7]  
Chang DM, 2018, OBES SURG
[8]   Long term (7 or more years) outcomes of the sleeve gastrectomy: a meta-analysis [J].
Clapp, Benjamin ;
Wynn, Matthew ;
Martyn, Colin ;
Foster, Chase ;
O'Dell, Montana ;
Tyroch, Alan .
SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2018, 14 (06) :741-747
[9]   Is the residual gastric volume after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy an objective criterion for adapting the treatment strategy after failure? [J].
Deguines, Jean-Baptiste ;
Verhaeghe, Pierre ;
Yzet, Thierry ;
Robert, Brice ;
Cosse, Cyril ;
Regimbeau, Jean-Marc .
SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2013, 9 (05) :660-666
[10]   Classification of surgical complications - A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey [J].
Dindo, D ;
Demartines, N ;
Clavien, PA .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (02) :205-213