Synchronous approach in interactive multiobjective optimization

被引:140
作者
Miettinen, K
Mäkelä, MM
机构
[1] Helsinki Sch Econ, FIN-00101 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Univ Jyvaskyla, Dept Math Informat Technol, FIN-40014 Jyvaskyla, Finland
关键词
multiple objective programming; MCDM; Internet; interactive methods; NIMBUS; WWW-NIMBUS; nonlinear programming;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2004.07.052
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
We introduce a new approach in the methodology development for interactive multiobjective optimization. Thepresentation is given in the context of the interactive NIMBUS method, where the solution process is based on the classification of objective functions. The idea is to formulate several scalarizing functions, all using the same preference information of the decision maker. Thus, opposed to fixing one scalarizing function (as is done in most methods), we utilize several scalarizing functions in a synchronous way. This means that we as method developers do not make the choice between different scalarizing functions but calculate the results of different scalarizing functions and leave the final decision to the expert, the decision maker. Simultaneously, (s)he obtains a better view of the solutions corresponding to her/his preferences expressed once during each iteration. In this paper, we describe a synchronous variant of the NIMBUS method. In addition, we introduce a new version of its implementation WWW-NIMBUS operating on the Internet. WWW-NIMBUS is a software system capable of solving even computationally demanding nonlinear problems. The new version of WWW-NIMBUS can handle versatile types of multiobjective optimization problems and includes new desirable features increasing its user-friendliness. (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:909 / 922
页数:14
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], INTERACTIVE DECISION
[2]  
BADJALOUANE AB, 1997, OPER RES, V45, P92
[3]  
Bazaraa M. S., 2013, NONLINEAR PROGRAMMIN
[4]  
Benayoun J. T. R., 1971, MATH PROGRAM, V1, P366, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF01584098
[5]   A comparison of two reference point methods in multiple objective mathematical programming [J].
Buchanan, J ;
Gardiner, L .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2003, 149 (01) :17-34
[6]   A naive approach for solving MCDM problems: The GUESS method [J].
Buchanan, JT .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 1997, 48 (02) :202-206
[7]  
Chankong V., 1983, Multiobjective Decision Making: Theory and Methodology
[8]   An efficient constraint handling method for genetic algorithms [J].
Deb, K .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2000, 186 (2-4) :311-338
[9]   UNIFIED INTERACTIVE MULTIPLE-OBJECTIVE PROGRAMMING [J].
GARDINER, LR ;
STEUER, RE .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1994, 74 (03) :391-406
[10]  
HAKANEN J, 2004, P 4 EUR C COMP METH, V2