Flexible representations of dynamics are used in object manipulation

被引:42
作者
Ahmed, Alaa A. [3 ]
Wolpert, Daniel M. [3 ]
Flanagan, J. Randall [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Queens Univ, Dept Psychol, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
[2] Queens Univ, Ctr Neurosci Studies, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
[3] Univ Cambridge, Dept Engn, Computat & Biol Learning Lab, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.cub.2008.04.061
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
To manipulate an object skillfully, the brain must learn its dynamics, specifying the mapping between applied force and motion. A fundamental issue in sensorimotor control is whether such dynamics are represented in an extrinsic frame of reference tied to the object or an intrinsic frame of reference linked to the arm. Although previous studies have suggested that objects are represented in arm-centered coordinates [1-6], all of these studies have used objects with unusual and complex dynamics. Thus, it is not known how objects with natural dynamics are represented. Here we show that objects with simple (or familiar) dynamics and those with complex (or unfamiliar) dynamics are represented in object- and arm-centered coordinates, respectively. We also show that objects with simple dynamics are represented with an intermediate coordinate frame when vision of the object is removed. These results indicate that object dynamics can be flexibly represented in different coordinate frames by the brain. We suggest that with experience, the representation of the dynamics of a manipulated object may shift from a coordinate frame tied to the arm toward one that is linked to the object. The additional complexity required to represent dynamics in object-centered coordinates would be economical for familiar objects because such a representation allows object use regardless of the orientation of the object in hand.
引用
收藏
页码:763 / 768
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Actions and consequences in bimanual interaction are represented in different coordinate systems
    Bays, Paul M.
    Wolpert, Daniel M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2006, 26 (26) : 7121 - 7126
  • [2] Blakemore SJ, 1998, J NEUROSCI, V18, P7511
  • [3] Consolidation in human motor memory
    BrashersKrug, T
    Shadmehr, R
    Bizzi, E
    [J]. NATURE, 1996, 382 (6588) : 252 - 255
  • [4] Neural correlates of internal-model loading
    Bursztyn, Lulu L. C. D.
    Ganesh, G.
    Imamizu, Hiroshi
    Kawato, Mitsuo
    Flanagan, J. Randall
    [J]. CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2006, 16 (24) : 2440 - 2445
  • [5] Anticipatory adjustments in the unloading task: Is an efference copy necessary for learning?
    Diedrichsen, J
    Verstynen, T
    Hon, A
    Lehman, SL
    Ivry, RB
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2003, 148 (02) : 272 - 276
  • [6] Flanagan JR, 1997, J NEUROSCI, V17, P1519
  • [7] Prediction precedes control in motor learning
    Flanagan, JR
    Vetter, P
    Johansson, RS
    Wolpert, DM
    [J]. CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (02) : 146 - 150
  • [8] Cortical correlates of learning in monkeys adapting to a new dynamical environment
    Gandolfo, F
    Li, CSR
    Benda, BJ
    Schioppa, CP
    Bizzi, E
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2000, 97 (05) : 2259 - 2263
  • [9] GHEZ C, 2004, NEW COGNITIVE NEUROS, P501
  • [10] Overlap of internal models in motor cortex for mechanical loads during reaching
    Gribble, PL
    Scott, SH
    [J]. NATURE, 2002, 417 (6892) : 938 - 941