Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Cardiogenic Shock and Cardiac Arrest: A Meta-Analysis

被引:96
作者
Xie, Ashleigh [1 ,2 ]
Phan, Kevin [1 ,6 ]
Tsai, Yi-Chin [3 ]
Yan, Tristan D. [1 ,4 ,6 ]
Forrest, Paul [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Macquarie Univ, Collaborat Res CORE Grp, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
[2] Univ New S Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Prince Charles Hosp, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Brisbane, Qld 4032, Australia
[4] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Royal Prince Alfred Hosp, Cardiothorac Anesthesia & Perfus, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[6] Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
关键词
cardiogenic shock; cardiac arrest; extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; extracorporeal circulation; meta-analysis; adult; ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; ADULT PATIENTS; CARDIOPULMONARY-RESUSCITATION; CIRCULATORY SUPPORT; SHORT-TERM; SURVIVAL; OUTCOMES; FAILURE; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1053/j.jvca.2014.09.005
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the effect of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) on survival and complication rates in adults with refractory cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest. Design: Meta-analysis. Setting: University hospitals. Participants: One thousand one hundred ninety-nine patients from 22 observational studies. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Observational studies published from the year 2000 onwards, examining at least 10 adult patients who received ECMO for refractory cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest were included. Pooled estimates with 95% confidence intervals were calculated based on the Freeman-Tukey double-arcsine transformation and DerSimonian-Laird random-effect model. Survival to discharge was 40.2% (95% confidence intervals [CI], 33.9-46.7), while survival at 3, 6, and 12 months was 55.9% (95% CI, 41.5-69.8), 47.6% (95% CI, 25.4-70.2), and 54.4% (95% CI, 36.6-71.7), respectively. Survival up to 30 days was higher in cardiogenic shock patients (52.5%, 95% CI, 43.7%-61.2%) compared to cardiac arrest (36.2%, 95% CI, 23.1%-50.4%). Concurrently, complication rates were particularly substantial for neurologic deficits (13.3%, 95% CI, 8.3-19.3), infection (25.1%, 95% CI, 15.9-35.5), and renal impairment (47.4%, 95% CI, 30.2-64.9). Significant heterogeneity was detected, although its levels were similar to previous meta-analyses that only examined short-term survival to discharge. Conclusions: Venoarterial ECMO can improve short-term survival in adults with refractory cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest. It also may provide favorable long-term survival at up to 3 years postdischarge. However, ECMO also is associated with significant complication rates, which must be incorporated into the risk-benefit analysis when considering treatment. These findings require confirmation by large, adequately controlled and standardized trials with long-term follow-up. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:637 / 645
页数:9
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], METHODS SYNTHESIS ST
[2]   Favourable clinical outcome in patients with cardiogenic shock due to fulminant myocarditis supported by percutaneous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [J].
Asaumi, Y ;
Yasuda, S ;
Morii, I ;
Kakuchi, H ;
Otsuka, Y ;
Kawamura, A ;
Sasako, Y ;
Nakatani, T ;
Nonogi, H ;
Miyazaki, S .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2005, 26 (20) :2185-2192
[3]   Incidence of EMS-treated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Europe [J].
Atwood, C ;
Eisenberg, MS ;
Herlitz, J ;
Rea, TD .
RESUSCITATION, 2005, 67 (01) :75-80
[4]   Favourable survival of in-hospital compared to out-of-hospital refractory cardiac arrest patients treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: An Italian tertiary care centre experience [J].
Avalli, Leonello ;
Maggioni, Elena ;
Formica, Francesco ;
Redaelli, Gianluigi ;
Migliari, Maurizio ;
Scanziani, Monica ;
Celotti, Simona ;
Coppo, Anna ;
Caruso, Rosa ;
Ristagno, Giuseppe ;
Fumagalli, Roberto .
RESUSCITATION, 2012, 83 (05) :579-583
[5]   Trends in management and outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock [J].
Babaev, A ;
Frederick, PD ;
Pasta, DJ ;
Every, N ;
Sichrovsky, T ;
Hochman, JS .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2005, 294 (04) :448-454
[6]   Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for treatment of cardiogenic shock: Clinical experiences in 45 adult patients [J].
Bakhtiary, Farhad ;
Keller, Harald ;
Dogan, Selami ;
Dzemali, Omer ;
Oezaslan, Feyzan ;
Meininger, Dirk ;
Ackermann, Hanns ;
Zwissler, Bernhard ;
Kleine, Peter ;
Moritz, Anton .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2008, 135 (02) :382-388
[7]   Emergency extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in a hospital without on-site cardiac surgical facilities [J].
Belle, Loic ;
Mangin, Lionel ;
Bonnet, Henry ;
Fol, Stephane ;
Santre, Charles ;
Delavenat, Laurence ;
Savary, Dominique ;
Bougon, David ;
Vialle, Emmanuelle ;
Dompnier, Antoine ;
Desjoyaux, Emmanuel ;
Blin, Dominique .
EUROINTERVENTION, 2012, 8 (03) :375-382
[8]   Pump-induced haemolysis: a comparison of short-term ventricular assist devices [J].
Bennett, M ;
Horton, S ;
Thuys, C ;
Augustin, S ;
Rosenberg, M ;
Brizard, C .
PERFUSION-UK, 2004, 19 (02) :107-111
[9]  
Bermudez C, 2012, REDO CARDIAC SURGERY IN ADULTS, SECOND EDITION, P67, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-1326-4_9
[10]   Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Advanced Refractory Shock in Acute and Chronic Cardiomyopathy [J].
Bermudez, Christian A. ;
Rocha, Rodolfo V. ;
Toyoda, Yoshiya ;
Zaldonis, Diana ;
Sappington, Penny L. ;
Mulukutla, Suresh ;
Marroquin, Oscar C. ;
Toma, Catalin ;
Bhama, Jay K. ;
Kormos, Robert L. .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2011, 92 (06) :2125-2131