Patients' preferences for adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage breast cancer: is treatment worthwhile?

被引:81
作者
Jansen, SJT
Kievit, J
Nooij, MA
de Haes, JCJM
Overpelt, IME
van Slooten, H
Maartense, E
Stiggelbout, AM
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Dept Med Decis Making, Med Ctr, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Dept Clin Oncol, Med Ctr, NL-2300 RC Leiden, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Med Psychol, NL-1100 DD Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Diacoonessen Hosp, Dept Internal Med, NL-2300 RD Leiden, Netherlands
[5] Reinier De Graaf Gasthuis, Dept Internal Med, NL-2600 GA Delft, Netherlands
关键词
preferences; breast cancer; chemotherapy; cognitive dissonance reduction; shared decision-making;
D O I
10.1054/bjoc.2001.1836
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
When making decisions about adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer, costs and benefits of treatment should be carefully weighed. In this process, patients' preferences are of major importance. The objectives of the present study were: (1) to determine the minimum benefits that patients need to find chemotherapy acceptable, and (2) to explore potential preference determinants, namely: positive experience of the treatment, reconciliation with the treatment decision, and demographic variables. Preferences were elicited from patients scheduled for adjuvant chemotherapy (chemotherapy group: n = 38) before (T-1), during (T-2), and 1 month after chemotherapy (T-3), and were compared to responses from patients not scheduled for chemotherapy (no-chemotherapy group: n = 38). The patients were asked, for a hypothetical situation, to indicate the minimum benefit (in terms of improved 5-year disease-free survival) to find adjuvant chemotherapy acceptable. In the chemotherapy group, the median benefit was 1% at all 3 measurement points. In the no-chemotherapy group the attitude towards chemotherapy became more negative over time, although not statistically significantly so (T-1: 12%, T-2:(:) 15%, T-3: 15%, P = 0.10). At all measurement points, the patients in the chemotherapy group indicated that they would accept chemotherapy for significantly (P < 0.01) less benefit than the patients in the no-chemotherapy group. Of the demographic variables, age was related to preferences, but only at T-2 and only in the no-chemotherapy group. The more positive attitude towards chemotherapy and the stability of preferences in the chemotherapy group indicated that reconciliation with the treatment decision was a more important determinant of patients' preferences than positive experience of the treatment. (C) 2001 Cancer Research Campaign.
引用
收藏
页码:1577 / 1585
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Abe O, 1998, LANCET, V352, P930
[2]   REGRET IN DECISION-MAKING UNDER UNCERTAINTY [J].
BELL, DE .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1982, 30 (05) :961-981
[3]  
BERKOWITZ L, 1986, SURVEY SOCIAL PSYCHO, P64
[4]   Trading treatment toxicity for survival in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer [J].
Brundage, MD ;
Davidson, JR ;
Mackillop, WJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (01) :330-340
[5]   Management preferences in stage I non-seminomatous germ cell tumours of the testis: An investigation among patients, controls and oncologists [J].
Cullen, MH ;
Billingham, LJ ;
Cook, J ;
Woodroffe, CM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1996, 74 (09) :1487-1491
[6]   Adjuvant cytotoxic chemotherapy for early breast cancer: doubts and decisions [J].
Dodwell, DJ .
LANCET, 1998, 351 (9114) :1506-1507
[7]   Patients' preferences for therapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: Development, testing, and application of a bedside decision instrument [J].
Elit, LM ;
Levine, MN ;
Gafni, A ;
Whelan, TJ ;
Doig, G ;
Streiner, DL ;
Rosen, B .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1996, 62 (03) :329-335
[8]   Tamoxifen and chemotherapy for lymph node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer [J].
Fisher, B ;
Dignam, J ;
Wolmark, N ;
DeCillis, A ;
Emir, B ;
Wickerham, DL ;
Bryant, J ;
Dimitrov, NV ;
Abramson, N ;
Atkins, JN ;
Shibata, H ;
Deschenes, L ;
Margolese, RG .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1997, 89 (22) :1673-1682
[9]   The effect of individually assessed preference weights on the relationship between holistic utilities and nonpreference-based assessment [J].
Jansen, SJT ;
Stiggelbout, AM ;
Nooij, MA ;
Kievit, J .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2000, 9 (05) :541-557
[10]   TEST RETEST RELIABILITIES OF 2 TREATMENT-PREFERENCE INSTRUMENTS IN MEASURING UTILITIES [J].
KIEBERT, GM ;
STIGGELBOUT, AM ;
LEER, JWH ;
KIEVIT, J ;
DEHAES, HJCJM .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1993, 13 (02) :133-140