Relationship between socioeconomic status and quality of life in older adults: a path analysis

被引:43
作者
Bielderman, A. [1 ]
de Greef, M. H. G. [1 ,2 ]
Krijnen, W. P. [1 ]
van der Schans, C. P. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hanze Univ Appl Sci, Res & Innovat Grp Hlth Care & Nursing, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Inst Human Movement Sci, Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Rehabil Med, NL-9713 AV Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
Quality of life; Older adults; Socioeconomic status; Psychosocial functioning; Physical function; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMS; FUNCTIONAL FITNESS; ELDERLY-PEOPLE; SOCIAL NETWORK; HEALTH; SCALE; AGE; DIFFERENTIALS; PERSPECTIVES;
D O I
10.1007/s11136-014-0898-y
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The main objective of this study was to determine the relationship between quality of life, social functioning, depressive symptoms, self-efficacy, physical function, and socioeconomic status (SES) in community-dwelling older adults. A cross-sectional design was used to examine the relationships. A sample of 193 community-dwelling older adults completed the measurements. Structural equation modeling with full information maximum likelihood in LISREL was used to evaluate the relationships between the latent variables (SES, social functioning, depressive symptoms, self-efficacy, physical function, and quality of life). The path analysis exhibited significant effects of SES on physical function, social functioning, depressive symptoms, and self-efficacy (gamma = 0.42-0.73), and significant effects in regard to social functioning, depressive symptoms, and self-efficacy on quality of life (gamma = 0.27-0.61). There was no direct effect of SES on the quality of life. The model fit indices demonstrated a reasonable fit (chi (2) = 98.3, df = 48, p < 0.001), matching the relative Chi-square criterion and the RMSEA criterion. The model explained 55.5 % of the variance of quality of life. The path analysis indicated an indirect effect of SES on the quality of life by social functioning, depressive symptoms, and self-efficacy in community-dwelling older adults. Physical function did not have a direct effect on the quality of life. To improve the quality of life in older adults, additional focus is required on the socioeconomic psychosocial differences in the community-dwelling older population.
引用
收藏
页码:1697 / 1705
页数:9
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
Ahuvia A.C., 2002, J HAPPINESS STUD, V3, P23, DOI [10.1023/A:1015682121103, DOI 10.1023/A:1015682121103]
[2]  
Allison P. D., 2012, Handling missing data by maximum likelihood
[3]  
Bandura A., 1997, Self-efficacy: the Exercise of Control
[4]   Defining Quality of Life: A Wild-Goose Chase? [J].
Barcaccia, Barbara ;
Esposito, Giuseppe ;
Matarese, Maria ;
Bertolaso, Marta ;
Elvira, Marta ;
Grazia De Marinis, Maria .
EUROPES JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 9 (01) :185-203
[5]   Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit [J].
Barrett, Paul .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2007, 42 (05) :815-824
[6]  
BENTLER PM, 1990, PSYCHOL BULL, V107, P238, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
[7]   Confirmatory factor analysis of the general self-efficacy scale [J].
Bosscher, RJ ;
Smit, JH .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 1998, 36 (03) :339-343
[8]  
Bouma J., 2012, ASSESSMENT SYMPTOMS
[9]   Quality of life among older people with poor functioning. The influence of perceived control over life [J].
Bowling, Ann ;
Seetai, Sharon ;
Morris, Richard ;
Ebrahim, Shah .
AGE AND AGEING, 2007, 36 (03) :310-315
[10]  
Bowling Ann, 2009, Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res, V2009, P298950, DOI 10.1155/2009/298950