The up-and-down method substantially reduces the number of animals required to determine antinociceptive ED50 values

被引:40
作者
Lichtman, AH [1 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Med Coll Virginia, Dept Pharmacol & Toxicol, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
关键词
antinociception; opioid; cannabinoid; nicotine; epibatidine; tail-flick;
D O I
10.1016/S1056-8719(98)00041-0
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
As a consequence of an awareness of animal welfare concerns, one of the goals in biomedical research is to reduce, whenever possible, the number of laboratory animals used for experimentation. The up-and-down method is a procedure that has been confirmed to reduce the number of animals needed to determine LD50 values without compromising reliability. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate whether the up-and-down method could be applied to reduce the number of animals required to obtain the ED50 values of various antinociceptive agents. The ED50 values of morphine, heroin, fentanyl, codeine, meperidine, Delta(9)-THC, CP 55,940, nicotine, and epibatidine for mice in the tail-flick test did not differ between the up-and-down method and a traditional dose-response procedure. Whereas a mean of 28 mice/drug were used in the dose-response procedure, only eight mice/drug were used in the up-and-down method. Moreover, the ED50 values calculated by both methods were highly correlated with each other (r = 0.99). Similarly, intracerebroventricular administration of either Delta(9)-THC or CP 55,940 to rats resulted in nearly identical ED50 values for both methods. These results support the use of the up-and-down method as an effective procedure to reduce substantially the number of animals needed to determine ED50 values of a variety of antinociceptive drugs. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:81 / 85
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] EFFECT OF SPEED OF INJECTION ON POTENCY OF ANESTHETIC INDUCTION-AGENTS
    AVELING, W
    BRADSHAW, AD
    CRANKSHAW, DP
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 1978, 6 (02) : 116 - 119
  • [2] BLISS CI, 1967, STAT BIOL, P439
  • [3] THE UP-AND-DOWN METHOD WITH SMALL SAMPLES
    BROWNLEE, KA
    HODGES, JL
    ROSENBLATT, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1953, 48 (262) : 262 - 277
  • [4] A CONFIRMATORY STUDY OF THE UP-AND-DOWN METHOD FOR ACUTE ORAL TOXICITY TESTING
    BRUCE, RD
    [J]. FUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED TOXICOLOGY, 1987, 8 (01): : 97 - 100
  • [5] AN UP-AND-DOWN PROCEDURE FOR ACUTE TOXICITY TESTING
    BRUCE, RD
    [J]. FUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED TOXICOLOGY, 1985, 5 (01): : 151 - 157
  • [6] Minimum local analgesic concentration of extradural bupivacaine increases with progression of labour
    Capogna, G
    Celleno, D
    Lyons, G
    Columb, M
    Fusco, P
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1998, 80 (01) : 11 - 13
  • [7] COOPER JR, 1979, AM J VET RES, V40, P1057
  • [8] THE UP-AND-DOWN METHOD FOR THE DETERMINATION OF NOCICEPTIVE THRESHOLDS IN RATS
    CROCKER, AD
    RUSSELL, RW
    [J]. PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1984, 21 (01) : 133 - 136
  • [9] PHARMACOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF EPIBATIDINE OPTICAL ENANTIOMERS
    DAMAJ, MI
    CREASY, KR
    GROVE, AD
    ROSECRANS, JA
    MARTIN, BR
    [J]. BRAIN RESEARCH, 1994, 664 (1-2) : 34 - 40
  • [10] Dixon W. J., 1969, INTRO STAT ANAL, P377