Return-to-work outcomes following work disability: Stakeholder motivations, interests and concerns

被引:276
|
作者
Young, AE
Wasiak, R
Roessler, RT
McPherson, KM
Anema, JR
van Poppel, MNM
机构
[1] Liberty Mutual Res Inst Safety, Ctr Disabil Res, Hopkinton, MA 01748 USA
[2] Univ Arkansas, Coll Educ & Hlth Profess, Rrehabil Human Resources & Commun Disorders Dept, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
[3] Auckland Univ Technol, Div Rehabil & Occupat Studies, Ctr Phys Rehabil Res, Auckland, New Zealand
[4] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Ctr Med, Dept Publ & Occupat Hlth, Inst Res Extramural Med, NL-1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
return to work; work disability; stakeholders; outcomes research; outcome measurement; employment outcomes;
D O I
10.1007/s10926-005-8033-0
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Introduction: Satisfaction with return-to-work (RTW) outcomes is dependent on many factors, including a clear exposition of what people define as a "good outcome" and the information they use to determine if such an outcome has been achieved. This paper defines the key stakeholders involved in the RTW process and discusses the need to understand their motivations, interests, and concerns. Methods:A review of the literature and discussions with RTW researchers conducted by a multidisciplinary group of academic researchers. Results: Our analysis suggests that RTW stakeholders can share the goal of a successful RTW; however, this consensus has to be viewed in light of other, sometimes competing, goals and the environments in which stakeholders operate. Conclusions: It is suggested that more clearly articulating and operationalizing stakeholders' perspectives will allow researchers to advance the understanding of RTW interventions and outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:543 / 556
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Self-direction by employees in return-to-work
    Hoefsmit, Nicole
    Boumans, Nicolle P. G.
    Houkes, Inge
    GEDRAG & ORGANISATIE, 2019, 32 (02): : 71 - 85
  • [42] Factors associated with return-to-work outcomes in inpatient rehabilitation - a systematic scoping review
    Foehner, K.
    Seipp, H.
    Becker, A.
    Maulbecker-Armstrong, C.
    Schneider, A.
    Seifart, U.
    van der Wardt, V.
    PSYCHOLOGY HEALTH & MEDICINE, 2024, 29 (02) : 191 - 215
  • [43] Factors Influencing Functional Outcomes and Return-to-Work After Amputation: A Review of the Literature
    Benjamin J. Darter
    Carolyn E. Hawley
    Amy J. Armstrong
    Lauren Avellone
    Paul Wehman
    Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 2018, 28 : 656 - 665
  • [44] Return-to-Work and Breast Cancer Survivorship Care
    Sun, Yuanlu
    Shigaki, Cheryl L.
    Armer, Jane M.
    CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS, 2020, 12 (03) : 202 - 207
  • [45] Factors Influencing Functional Outcomes and Return-to-Work After Amputation: A Review of the Literature
    Darter, Benjamin J.
    Hawley, Carolyn E.
    Armstrong, Amy J.
    Avellone, Lauren
    Wehman, Paul
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2018, 28 (04) : 656 - 665
  • [46] Usefulness of a 'workplace prescription' as a resource for return-to-work
    DeKoven, Benjamin
    Gomez, Pilar
    Kudla, Irena
    DeKoven, Joel
    Skotnicki, Sandy
    Holness, D. Linn
    CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2024, 90 (02) : 182 - 184
  • [47] Communication and collaboration among return-to-work stakeholders
    Russell, Elizabeth
    Kosny, Agnieszka
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2019, 41 (22) : 2630 - 2639
  • [48] Return-to-work barriers for workers with contact dermatitis
    Holness, DL
    CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2003, 49 (06) : 273 - 275
  • [49] Return-to-Work and Breast Cancer Survivorship Care
    Yuanlu Sun
    Cheryl L. Shigaki
    Jane M. Armer
    Current Breast Cancer Reports, 2020, 12 : 202 - 207
  • [50] Impact of job characteristics on return-to-work interval following arthroscopic partial meniscectomy
    Van Doninck, Jef
    Van Doninck, Dries
    Sprenghers, Lyndon
    Peeters, Elke
    Du Bois, Marc
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA BELGICA, 2022, 88 (01): : 95 - 101