Interference between postural control and spatial vs. non-spatial auditory reaction time tasks in older adults

被引:7
|
作者
Fuhrman, Susan I. [1 ]
Redfern, Mark S. [1 ,2 ]
Jennings, J. Richard [3 ]
Furman, Joseph M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Otolaryngol, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Bioengn, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Psychol, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF VESTIBULAR RESEARCH-EQUILIBRIUM & ORIENTATION | 2015年 / 25卷 / 02期
关键词
Posture; aging; dual-task; spatial task; spatial orientation; SENSORY INTEGRATION; ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION; PERFORMANCE; DYSFUNCTION; POPULATION; PREVALENCE; DEMANDS; BALANCE; LEVEL;
D O I
10.3233/VES-150546
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
This study investigated whether spatial aspects of an information processing task influence dual-task interference. Two groups (Older/Young) of healthy adults participated in dual-task experiments. Two auditory information processing tasks included a frequency discrimination choice reaction time task (non-spatial task) and a lateralization choice reaction time task (spatial task). Postural tasks included combinations of standing with eyes open or eyes closed on either a fixed floor or a sway-referenced floor. Reaction times and postural sway via center of pressure were recorded. Baseline measures of reaction time and sway were subtracted from the corresponding dual-task results to calculate reaction time task costs and postural task costs. Reaction time task cost increased with eye closure (p = 0.01), sway-referenced flooring (p < 0.0001), and the spatial task (p = 0.04). Additionally, a significant (p = 0.05) task x vision x age interaction indicated that older subjects had a significant vision X task interaction whereas young subjects did not. However, when analyzed by age group, the young group showed minimal differences in interference for the spatial and non-spatial tasks with eyes open, but showed increased interference on the spatial relative to non-spatial task with eyes closed. On the contrary, older subjects demonstrated increased interference on the spatial relative to the non-spatial task with eyes open, but not with eyes closed. These findings suggest that visual-spatial interference may occur in older subjects when vision is used to maintain posture.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 55
页数:9
相关论文
共 7 条
  • [1] Non-visual spatial tasks reveal increased interactions with stance postural control
    Woollacott, Marjorie
    Velde, Tmothy J. Vander
    BRAIN RESEARCH, 2008, 1208 : 95 - 102
  • [2] Postural Control While Walking Interferes With Spatial Learning in Older Adults Navigating in a Real Environment
    Agathos, Catherine Persephone
    Ramanoel, Stephen
    Becu, Marcia
    Bernardin, Delphine
    Habas, Christophe
    Arleo, Angelo
    FRONTIERS IN AGING NEUROSCIENCE, 2020, 12
  • [3] The Differences in Transient Characteristics of Postural Control between Young and Older Adults across Four Different Postural Tasks
    Kozinc, Ziga
    Marjanov, Nika
    Sarabon, Nejc
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023, 13 (06):
  • [4] Postural prioritization is differentially altered in healthy older compared to younger adults during visual and auditory coded spatial multitasking
    Liston, Matthew B.
    Bergmann, Jeroen H.
    Keating, Niamh
    Green, David A.
    Pavlou, Marousa
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2014, 39 (01) : 198 - 204
  • [5] Effects of Spatial and Nonspatial Memory Tasks on Choice Stepping Reaction Time in Older People
    Sturnieks, Daina L.
    George, Rebecca St.
    Fitzpatrick, Richard C.
    Lord, Stephen R.
    JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES A-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2008, 63 (10): : 1063 - 1068
  • [6] The Development of Non-Spatial Working Memory Capacity During Childhood and Adolescence and the Role of Interference Control: An N-Back Task Study
    Schleepen, Tamara M. J.
    Jonkman, Lisa M.
    DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 35 (01) : 37 - 56
  • [7] Relationship between reaction time, fine motor control, and visual-spatial perception on vigilance and visual-motor tasks in 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome
    Howley, Sarah A.
    Prasad, Sarah E.
    Pender, Niall P.
    Murphy, Kieran C.
    RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2012, 33 (05) : 1495 - 1502