Group formation based on learning styles: can it improve students' teamwork?

被引:27
作者
Kyprianidou, Maria [1 ]
Demetriadis, Stavros [1 ]
Tsiatsos, Thrasyvoulos [1 ]
Pombortsis, Andreas [1 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Dept Informat, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece
来源
ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT | 2012年 / 60卷 / 01期
关键词
Learning styles; Group formation; Technology-enhanced collaborative learning; DIVERSITY; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1007/s11423-011-9215-4
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This work explores the impact of teacher-led heterogeneous group formation on students' teamwork, based on students' learning styles. Fifty senior university students participated in a project-based course with two key organizational features: first, a web system (PEGASUS) was developed to help students identify their learning styles and distribute them to heterogeneous groups. Second, group facilitation meetings were introduced as a technique to help students reflect on their weak/strong traits and employ appropriate roles in their group. The study research questions focused mainly on students' attitudes regarding the learning style-based group formation approach. By applying qualitative research method students' views were recorded about the impact of styles awareness and group heterogeneity on group collaboration and possible benefits and drawbacks related to the style-based grouping approach. Evaluation data revealed that students gradually overcame their initial reservations for the innovative group formation method and were highly benefited since styles heterogeneity within the group emphasized complementarities and pluralism in students' ways of thinking. Overall, this work provides evidence that the adoption of learning styles theories in practice can be facilitated by systems for automated group formation and supportive group facilitation meetings that help avoiding the trivial and discouraging approach of using learning styles to simply label students.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 110
页数:28
相关论文
共 83 条
[71]  
Raudsepp E., 1992, College Edition of the National Employment Weekly, P7
[72]   A teaching elixir, learning chimera or just fool's gold? Do learning styles matter? [J].
Rayner, Steve .
SUPPORT FOR LEARNING, 2007, 22 (01) :24-30
[73]   Diversity and business performance: 50 years of research [J].
Ricardo De Abreu Dos Reis, Carlos ;
Sastre Castillo, Miguel Angel ;
Roig Dobon, Salvador .
SERVICE BUSINESS, 2007, 1 (04) :257-274
[74]  
Robinson Ken., 2001, Out of Our Minds: Learning to Be Creative
[75]   The relationship between learning style and cognitive style [J].
Sadler-Smith, E .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2001, 30 (04) :609-616
[76]   Evaluating collaborative learning and community [J].
Summers, JJ ;
Beretvas, SN ;
Svinicki, MD ;
Gorin, JS .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL EDUCATION, 2005, 73 (03) :165-188
[77]  
Swanson L., 1995, Learning styles: A review of the literature
[78]  
Uljens M., 1996, REFLECTION PHENOMENO, P105
[79]   Metacognitive, cognitive and affective aspects of learning styles and strategies: A phenomenographic analysis [J].
Vermunt, JD .
HIGHER EDUCATION, 1996, 31 (01) :25-50
[80]   DIANA: A computer-supported heterogeneous grouping system for teachers to conduct successful small learning groups [J].
Wang, Dai-Yi ;
Lin, Sunny S. J. ;
Sun, Chuen-Tsai .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2007, 23 (04) :1997-2010