A RELIABLE METHOD FOR ASSESSING ROTATIONAL POWER

被引:19
作者
Andre, Matthew J. [1 ]
Fry, Andrew C. [1 ]
Heyrman, Melissa A. [1 ]
Hudy, Andrea [2 ]
Holt, Brady [2 ]
Roberts, Cody [2 ]
Vardiman, J. Phillip [1 ]
Gallagher, Philip M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kansas, Dept Hlth Sport & Exercise Sci, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
[2] Univ Kansas, Dept Athlet, Lawrence, KS 66045 USA
关键词
assessment; performance; core; EXERCISES;
D O I
10.1519/JSC.0b013e318227664d
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Andre, MJ, Fry, AC, Heyrman, MA, Hudy, A, Holt, B, Roberts, C, Vardiman, JP, and Gallagher, PM. A reliable method for assessing rotational power. J Strength Cond Res 26(3): 720-724, 2012-Rotational core training is said to be beneficial for rotational power athletes. Currently, there has been no method proposed for the reliable assessment of rotational power. Therefore, our purpose was to determine the test-retest reliability of kinetic and kinematic rotational characteristics of a pulley system when performing a rotational exercise of the axial skeleton in the transverse plane to find out if this would be a reliable tool for evaluating rotational power. Healthy, college-aged men (n = 8) and women (n = 15) reported for 3 testing sessions. The participants were seated on a box, and they held the handle with both arms extended in front of their body, starting their motion with their torso rotated toward the machine. All the participants rotated their torso forcefully until they reached 180 degrees of rotation, and they then slowly returned to the starting position, 3 times per trial, with 3 loads: 9% body weight (BW), 12% BW, and 15% BW. The repetition with the greatest power for each trial for each load was analyzed. The mean peak power repetition (watts) for all the subjects was 20.09 +/- 7.16 (9% BW), 26.17 +/- 8.6 (12% BW), and 30.74 +/- 11.022 (15% BW) in the first training session and 22.3 +/- 8.087 (9% BW), 28.7 +/- 11.295 (12% BW), and 33.52 +/- 12.965 (15% BW) in the second training session with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.97 (9% BW), 0.94 (12% BW), and 0.95 (15% BW). When the participants were separated by sex, there were no significant differences between groups. Based on these results, it was found that a pulley system and an external dynamometer can be used together as a reliable research tool to assess rotational power.
引用
收藏
页码:720 / 724
页数:5
相关论文
共 8 条
  • [1] Earp J.E., 2010, Strength and Conditioning Journal, V32, P20, DOI [10.1519/SSC.0b013e3181e92911, DOI 10.1519/SSC.0B013E3181E92911]
  • [2] Hamlyn N, 2007, J STRENGTH COND RES, V21, P1108
  • [3] Jennings CL, 2005, J STRENGTH COND RES, V19, P859
  • [4] The myth of core stability
    Lederman, Eyal
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES, 2010, 14 (01) : 84 - 98
  • [5] Lehman Gregory J, 2007, J Can Chiropr Assoc, V51, P139
  • [6] Core Training: Evidence Translating to Better Performance and Injury Prevention
    McGill, Stuart
    [J]. STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING JOURNAL, 2010, 32 (03) : 33 - 46
  • [7] Trunk muscle activity during stability ball and free weight exercises
    Nuzzo, James L.
    McCaulley, Grant O.
    Cormie, Prue
    Cavill, Michael J.
    McBride, Jeffrey M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2008, 22 (01) : 95 - 102
  • [8] Willardson JM, 2004, STRENGTH COND J, V26, P70