Testing the short-term effectiveness of primary care referral to online weight loss programmes: A randomised controlled trial

被引:2
|
作者
Noreik, Michaela [1 ,2 ]
Madigan, Claire D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Astbury, Nerys M. [1 ,2 ]
Edwards, Rhiannon M. [1 ]
Galal, Ushma [1 ]
Mollison, Jill [1 ]
Ghebretinsea, Fitsum [1 ]
Jebb, Susan A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Primary Care Hlth Sci, Radcliffe Observ Quarter, Oxford OX26GG, England
[2] Oxford Univ Hosp, NHS Fdn Trust, NIHR Oxford Biomed Res Ctr, Oxford, England
[3] Loughborough Univ, Ctr Lifestyle Med & Behav, Loughborough, Leics, England
关键词
digital intervention; digital weight loss programmes; obesity; LOSS INTERVENTIONS; MANAGEMENT; OVERWEIGHT; OBESITY; ADULTS;
D O I
10.1111/cob.12482
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Guidelines ask health professionals to offer brief advice to encourage weight loss for people living with obesity. We tested whether referral to one of three online programmes could lead to successful weight loss. A total of 528 participants aged >= 18 years with a body mass index of >= 30 kg/m(2) were invited via a letter from their GP. Participants were randomised to one of three online weight loss programmes (NHS Weight Loss Plan, Rosemary Online or Slimming World Online) or to a control group receiving no intervention. Participants self-reported weight at baseline and 8 weeks. The primary outcome was weight change in each of the active intervention groups compared with control. We also compared the proportion of participants losing >= 5% or >= 10% of body weight. For Rosemary, Online mean weight loss was modestly greater than control (-1.5 kg [95% confidence interval (CI) -2.3 to -0.6]) and more than three times as many participants in this group lost >= 5% (relative risk [RR] = 3.64, 95% CI: 1.63-8.1). For Slimming World, mean weight loss was not significantly different from control (-0.8 kg [95%CI -1.7 to 0.1]), twice as many participants lost >= 5% (RR = 2.70, 1.17-6.23). There was no significant difference in weight loss for participants using the NHS Weight Loss Plan (-0.4 kg, [95% CI -1.3 to 0.5]), or the proportion losing >= 5% (RR = 2.09, 0.87-5.01). Only one of three online weight loss programmes was superior to no intervention and the effect size modest among participants living with obesity.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Primary care referral to a commercial provider for weight loss treatment versus standard care: a randomised controlled trial
    Jebb, Susan A.
    Ahern, Amy L.
    Olson, Ashley D.
    Aston, Louise M.
    Holzapfel, Christina
    Stoll, Julia
    Amann-Gassner, Ulrike
    Simpson, Annie E.
    Fuller, Nicholas R.
    Pearson, Suzanne
    Lau, Namson S.
    Mander, Adrian P.
    Hauner, Hans
    Caterson, Ian D.
    LANCET, 2011, 378 (9801): : 1485 - 1492
  • [2] Weight loss maintenance in primary health care: a randomised controlled trial
    de Freitas, Patricia Pinheiro
    Lopes, Mariana Souza
    Lopes, Aline Critine Souza
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2024, 132 (09) : 1255 - 1266
  • [3] A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of primary care referral to a commercial provider for weight loss treatment, relative to standard care—an international randomised controlled trial
    N R Fuller
    S Colagiuri
    D Schofield
    A D Olson
    R Shrestha
    C Holzapfel
    S B Wolfenstetter
    R Holle
    A L Ahern
    H Hauner
    S A Jebb
    I D Caterson
    International Journal of Obesity, 2013, 37 : 828 - 834
  • [4] A within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis of primary care referral to a commercial provider for weight loss treatment, relative to standard care-an international randomised controlled trial
    Fuller, N. R.
    Colagiuri, S.
    Schofield, D.
    Olson, A. D.
    Shrestha, R.
    Holzapfel, C.
    Wolfenstetter, S. B.
    Holle, R.
    Ahern, A. L.
    Hauner, H.
    Jebb, S. A.
    Caterson, I. D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY, 2013, 37 (06) : 828 - 834
  • [5] A pragmatic randomised controlled trial in primary care of the Camden Weight Loss (CAMWEL) programme
    Nanchahal, Kiran
    Power, Tom
    Holdsworth, Elizabeth
    Hession, Michelle
    Sorhaindo, Annik
    Griffiths, Ulla
    Townsend, Joy
    Thorogood, Nicki
    Haslam, David
    Kessel, Anthony
    Ebrahim, Shah
    Kenward, Mike
    Haines, Andrew
    BMJ OPEN, 2012, 2 (03):
  • [6] A randomised controlled trial to compare a range of commercial or primary care led weight reduction programmes with a minimal intervention control for weight loss in obesity: the Lighten Up trial
    Kate Jolly
    Amanda Daley
    Peymane Adab
    Amanda Lewis
    John Denley
    Jane Beach
    Paul Aveyard
    BMC Public Health, 10
  • [7] A randomised controlled trial to compare a range of commercial or primary care led weight reduction programmes with a minimal intervention control for weight loss in obesity: the Lighten Up trial
    Jolly, Kate
    Daley, Amanda
    Adab, Peymane
    Lewis, Amanda
    Denley, John
    Beach, Jane
    Aveyard, Paul
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2010, 10
  • [8] PRIMARY OUTCOMES IN A RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL FOR WEIGHT LOSS IN YOUTH WITH
    Fleming, R.
    Bandini, L.
    Curtin, C.
    Dittrich, G.
    JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2019, 63 (07) : 794 - 794
  • [9] Effect of interdisciplinary care on weight loss: a randomised controlled trial
    Tapsell, Linda C.
    Lonergan, Maureen
    Batterham, Marijka J.
    Neale, Elizabeth P.
    Martin, Allison
    Thorne, Rebecca
    Deane, Frank
    Peoples, Gregory
    BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (07):
  • [10] Randomised clinical trial: identification of responders to short-term treatment with esomeprazole for dyspepsia in primary care - a randomised, placebo-controlled study
    Meineche-Schmidt, V.
    Christensen, E.
    Bytzer, P.
    ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2011, 33 (01) : 41 - 49