Postoperative complications, pain and quality of life after thoracoscopic or thoracotomic lobectomy for lung cancer

被引：1

作者：

Porrello, C. ^{[1
]}

Scerrino, G. ^{[2
]}

Vaglica, A. ^{[1
]}

Palazzolo, M. ^{[1
]}

Gagliardo, C. M. ^{[1
]}

Giangregorio, F. ^{[1
]}

Iadicola, D. ^{[2
]}

Tomasello, G. ^{[5
]}

Lo Faso, F. ^{[3
]}

Kawamukai, K. ^{[4
]}

Lacava, N. ^{[4
]}

Carini, Fabrizio ^{[5
]}

Cocorullo, G. ^{[2
]}

Gullo, R. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Palermo, AOU Policlin Paolo Giaccone, Thorac Surg Unit, Palermo, Italy

[2] Univ Palermo, AOU Policlin Paolo Giaccone, Emergency Surg Unit, Palermo, Italy

[3] Marche Nord Hosp, Gen & Mini Invas Thorac Surg Unit, Marche, Italy

[4] Presidio Osped Maggiore Bellaria, Thorac Surg Unit, Bologna, Italy

[5] Univ Palermo, Dept Expt Biomed & Clin Neurosci, Sect Anat, BIONEC, Palermo, Italy

来源：

GIORNALE DI CHIRURGIA | 2019年 / 40卷 / 02期

关键词：

Lobectomy; Thoracoscopy; Thoracotomy; Lung cancer; Quality of life; Complications;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

R61 [外科手术学];

学科分类号：

摘要：

Aim. Thoracoscopic lobectomy is superior to thoracotomy, but the evidence for this assumption is low. We present a comparison between thoracotomy and thoracoscopy in term of postoperative complications, mortality, postoperative pain, hospital stay and quality of life. Patients and methods. This is a retrospective analysis of 224 lobectomies in 24-months. 128 patients (57.1%) were operated by thoracotomy; 96 patients (42.9%) by videothoracoscopy. Results. Major complications were observed in 4/128 (3.1%) in thoracotomy group and in 1/96 (1%) in thoracoscopy. Minor complications were observed in 38/128 patients (29.7%) in the thoracotomy, and in 16/96 (16.7%) thoracoscopy. Thoracoscopy patients had a shorter hospital stay. Conclusion. Our study shows an advantage of thoracoscopy over thoracotomy but further studies are needed.

引用

页码：115 / 119

页数：5

共 23 条

[1] Postoperative pain and quality of life after lobectomy via video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or anterolateral thoracotomy for early stage lung cancer: a randomised controlled trial [J].

Bendixen, Morten ;

Jorgensen, Ole Dan ;

Kronborg, Christian ;

Andersen, Claus ;

Licht, Peter Bjorn .

LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2016, 17 (06) :836-844

[2] A meta-analysis of unmatched and matched patients comparing video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy and conventional open lobectomy [J].

Cao, Christopher ;

Manganas, Con ;

Ang, Su C. ;

Yan, Tristan D. .

ANNALS OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2012, 1 (01) :16-23

[3] Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy (VATS), open thoracotomy, and the robot for lung cancer [J].

Flores, Raja M. ;

Alam, Naveed .

ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2008, 85 (02) :S710-S715

[4] Uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery: a call for better evidence, not just more evidence [J].

Gonzalez-Rivas, Diego ;

Damico, Thomas A. ;

Jiang, Gening ;

Sihoe, Alan .

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2016, 50 (03) :416-417

[5] Treatment of Stage I and II Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Management of Lung Cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines [J].

Howington, John A. ;

Blum, Matthew G. ;

Chang, Andrew C. ;

Balekian, Alex A. ;

Murthy, Sudish C. .

CHEST, 2013, 143 (05) :E278-E313

[6] LOBECTOMY - VIDEO-ASSISTED THORACIC-SURGERY VERSUS MUSCLE-SPARING THORACOTOMY - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL [J].

KIRBY, TJ ;

MACK, MJ ;

LANDRENEAU, RJ ;

RICE, TW .

JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1995, 109 (05) :997-1002

[7] Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus open lobectomy for stage I lung cancer: A meta-analysis of long-term outcomes [J].

Li, Zhengjun ;

Liu, Hongxu ;

Li, Le .

EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2012, 3 (05) :886-892

[8] Video-assisted thoracic surgery sleeve lobectomy: A case series [J].

Mahtabifard, Ali ;

Fuller, Clark B. ;

McKenna, Robert J., Jr. .

ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2008, 85 (02) :S729-S732

[9] Video-assisted thoracic surgery techniques for lung cancer: which is better? [J].

Migliore, Marcello .

FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2016, 12 (23) :1-4

[10]

Migliore M, 2016, FUTURE ONCOL, V12, P5, DOI [10.2217/fon.14.286, 10.2217/fon-2016-370]

← 1 2 3 →