A potential source for PM2.5: Analysis of fine particle generation mechanism in Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization System by modeling drying and breakage of slurry droplet

被引:22
作者
Jiang, Binfan [1 ]
Xie, Yulei [1 ]
Xia, Dehong [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Xiangjun [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sci & Technol Beijing, Sch Energy & Environm Engn, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Sci & Technol Beijing, Beijing Key Lab Energy Saving & Emiss Reduct Met, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Wet flue gas desulfurization; PM2.5; Gas-gas heater; Droplet drying; Particle breakage; POLLUTION; EMISSION; EVENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.envpol.2018.12.001
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Aerosol particulate matter with dynamic diameter smaller than 2.5 mu m (PM2.5) is the main cause for haze pollution in China. As a dominant precursor of PM2.5, SO2 emitted from industrial process is now strictly controlled by using limestone/gypsum Wet Flue Gas Desulfurization (WFGD) system in China. However, a phenomenon that fine particle derived from WFGD is recently addressed, and is suggested to be a potential source of primary PM2.5. Herein, a first investigation into the particle generation mechanism in WFGD system is conducted with a novel droplet (containing particles) drying and breakage model. The proposed model considers a random and porous crust instead of the previous regular crust assumption, and is verified by comparing the modeling results with measurements. An orthogonal test with four factors and three levels is carried out through modeling calculation, and flue gas temperature (T-g) in the inlet is found to be a governing parameter for PM2.5 yields in WFGD. With T-g in range of 120-160 degrees C, PM2.5 yields in desulfurizing tower can reach a maximum value at similar to 2 x 10(8) cm(-3) under typical WFGD condition. To avoid this situation and reduce the PM2.5 generation, T-g is suggested to be lower than 120 degrees C. Additionally, a new insight of the elimination effect of gas-gas heater (GGH) on "gypsum rain" in WFGD system is provided. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 256
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, INTERMOLECULAR SURFA
[2]  
[Anonymous], COMPUT CHEM ENG
[3]  
[Anonymous], ENERGY ENG J ASS ENE
[4]  
[Anonymous], ELECT POWER ENV PROT
[5]  
[Anonymous], 132232011 GB MIN EC
[6]  
[Anonymous], CHEMECA99
[7]   Status of Flue Gas Desulphurisation (FGD) systems from coal-fired power plants: Overview of the physic-chemical control processes of wet limestone FGDs [J].
Cordoba, Patricia .
FUEL, 2015, 144 :274-286
[8]   Enhancing the recovery of gypsum in limestone-based wet flue gas desulfurization with high energy ball milling process: A feasibility study [J].
de Gisi, Sabina ;
Molino, Antonio ;
Notarnicola, Michele .
PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2017, 109 :117-129
[9]   Prediction of SO2 removal efficiency for wet Flue Gas Desulfurization [J].
Dou, Binlin ;
Pan, Weiguo ;
Jin, Qiang ;
Wang, Wenhuan ;
Li, Yu .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2009, 50 (10) :2547-2553
[10]   A new approach to modelling of single droplet drying [J].
Farid, M .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2003, 58 (13) :2985-2993