Computer simulations of optical turbulence in the weak- and strong-scattering regime: angle-of-arrival fluctuations obtained from ray optics and wave optics

被引:17
作者
Voelz, David [1 ]
Wijerathna, Erandi [1 ]
Muschinski, Andreas [2 ,3 ]
Xiao, Xifeng [1 ]
机构
[1] New Mexico State Univ, Klipsch Sch Elect & Comp Engn, Las Cruces, NM 88003 USA
[2] NorthWest Res Associates, Boulder, CO USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Aerosp Engn Dept, Boulder, CO USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
atmospheric turbulence; Rytov variance; angle of arrival; wave optics; split-step simulation; ray optics; PROPAGATION; ATMOSPHERE; BEHAVIOR; MEDIA; BEAM;
D O I
10.1117/1.OE.57.10.104102
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
It is known that certain geometrical-optics predictions often agree well with optical turbulence field observations even though theoretical constraints for ignoring diffraction may be violated. Geometrical optics assumptions can simplify analyses, and ray optics can significantly reduce simulation computation time. Here, an investigation into angle-of-arrival fluctuations is presented involving wave optics and geometrical (ray) optics computer simulations of a plane wave of visible light propagating through a turbulent refractiveindex field. The simulation and Rytov-based theory results for the variances of aperture-filtered angle-of-arrival fluctuations generally agree well for weak scattering (Rytov variance, sigma(2)(R) less than or similar to 0.2), but for increasing Rytov variance, the simulation results demonstrate a positive slope that can be significantly shallower than that predicted by the theory. For weak-to-moderate scattering regimes (sigma(2)(R) less than or similar to 2.67), a comparison of the ray and wave results show they match for aperture diameters greater than about two Fresnel lengths. This result is consistent with a previous theoretical analysis by Cheon and Muschinski. For the strongest scattering case studied (sigma(2)(R) = 26.7), the wave and ray simulations match for aperture diameters greater than about 10 Fresnel lengths. For smaller apertures, we attribute the disparity between the wave and ray simulation results to a Fresnel filtering effect. (C) The Authors. Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Andrews L. C., 2005, LASER BEAM PROPAGATI, P783
[2]   Angle-of-arrival anemometry by means of a large-aperture Schmidt-Cassegrain telescope equipped with a CCD camera [J].
Cheon, Yonghun ;
Hohreiter, Vincent ;
Behn, Mario ;
Muschinski, Andreas .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 2007, 24 (11) :3478-3492
[3]   Closed-form approximations for the angle-of-arrivid variance of plane and spherical waves propagating through homogeneous and isotropic turbulence [J].
Cheon, Yonghun ;
Muschinski, Andreas .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 2007, 24 (02) :415-422
[4]   WANDER OF AN OPTICAL BEAM IN THE TURBULENT ATMOSPHERE [J].
CHURNSIDE, JH ;
LATAITIS, RJ .
APPLIED OPTICS, 1990, 29 (07) :926-930
[7]  
Korotkova O., 2014, RANDOM LIGHT BEAMS T, P361
[8]   Comparative analysis of numerical simulation techniques for incoherent imaging of extended objects through atmospheric turbulence [J].
Lachinova, Svetlana L. ;
Vorontsov, Mikhail A. ;
Filimonov, Grigory A. ;
LeMaster, Daniel A. ;
Trippel, Matthew E. .
OPTICAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 56 (07)
[9]   INTENSITY IMAGES AND STATISTICS FROM NUMERICAL-SIMULATION OF WAVE-PROPAGATION IN 3-D RANDOM-MEDIA [J].
MARTIN, JM ;
FLATTE, SM .
APPLIED OPTICS, 1988, 27 (11) :2111-2126
[10]  
Martinez W. L., 2016, COMPUTATIONAL STAT H, P124