Immediate salbutamol responsiveness does not predict long-term benefits of indacaterol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

被引:9
作者
Burgel, Pierre-Regis [1 ]
Le Gros, Vincent [2 ]
Decuypere, Laurent [2 ]
Bourdeix, Isabelle [2 ]
Perez, Thierry [3 ]
Deslee, Gaetan [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris 05, Sorbonne Paris Cite, Hop Cochin, AP HP,Resp Med, 27 Rue Faubourg St Jacques, F-75014 Paris, France
[2] Novartis Pharma SAS, Resp Med Dept, Paris, France
[3] Univ Lille, CHU Lille, Pulm Dept, Lille, France
[4] CHU Reims, Hop Maison Blanche, INSERM, UMRS 903,Resp Med, Reims, France
关键词
COPD; Indacaterol; Reversibility; Salbutamol; CAUSE-SPECIFIC MORTALITY; ONCE-DAILY INDACATEROL; EQUAL-TO; 12-PERCENT; BRONCHODILATOR REVERSIBILITY; 200; ML; COPD; SALMETEROL; FORMOTEROL; EFFICACY; TIOTROPIUM;
D O I
10.1186/s12890-017-0372-z
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation between immediate responsiveness with the short-acting beta(2)-agonist salbutamol and effects of treatment with the ultra-long-acting beta(2)-agonist indacaterol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods: The REVERBREZ study was a phase IV, multicentre, open-label study in which patients with moderate-to-severe COPD received indacaterol 150 mu g once-daily for 5 months. The primary endpoint was the correlation between immediate response of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) post-inhalation of salbutamol (400 mu g) at study entry and the change from baseline in trough FEV1 after 1 month of indacaterol. Secondary endpoints included dyspnoea measured by the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) grade and health-related quality of life measured by the clinical COPD questionnaire (CCQ). Results: Of the 602 patients enrolled from 177 centres in France, 543 patients received at least one indacaterol dose, 512 patients completed 1 month of indacaterol treatment (primary endpoint), and 400 patients completed 5 months of treatment. At study entry, mean FEV1 values before and after salbutamol inhalation were 1.54 +/- 0. 50 L and 1.65 +/- 0.53 L, respectively. Based on the magnitude of an immediate response of FEV1 after salbutamol inhalation at study entry, patients were classified into reversible (Rv, >= 12% and = 200 mL from pre-salbutamol value; n = 106) and non-reversible (NRv, < 12% or < 200 mL from pre-salbutamol value; n = 431) groups. After 1 month of indacaterol treatment, mean absolute and relative difference in trough FEV1 were 100 mL and 9%, respectively. No significant correlation was found between the immediate FEV1 response to salbutamol at study entry and change from baseline in trough FEV1 after 1 month of indacaterol treatment (correlation coefficient = 0.056 [95% CI;-0.032, 0.144] for absolute response and 0.028 [95% CI;-0.06, 0.116] for relative response). At all subsequent visits, mMRC and CCQ scores, and FEV1 improved from baseline with no significant difference between the Rv and NRv groups. Conclusions: Immediate FEV1 response to salbutamol did not predict the long-term benefits observed with indacaterol treatment in patients with COPD. Patients considered reversible or non-reversible to salbutamol showed comparable improvements in lung function, dyspnoea and health-related quality of life.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Bronchodilator responsiveness as a phenotypic characteristic of established chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [J].
Albert, Paul ;
Agusti, Alvar ;
Edwards, Lisa ;
Tal-Singer, Ruth ;
Yates, Julie ;
Bakke, Per ;
Celli, Bartolome R. ;
Coxson, Harvey O. ;
Crim, Courtney ;
Lomas, David A. ;
MacNee, William ;
Miller, Bruce ;
Rennard, Stephen ;
Silverman, Edwin K. ;
Vestbo, Jorgen ;
Wouters, Emiel ;
Calverley, Peter .
THORAX, 2012, 67 (08) :701-708
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management and Prevention of COPD, Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2016, GLOBAL STRATEGY DIAG
[4]  
Boyd G, 1997, EUR RESPIR J, V10, P815
[5]   Blinded 12-week comparison of once-daily indacaterol and tiotropium in COPD [J].
Buhl, R. ;
Dunn, L. J. ;
Disdier, C. ;
Lassen, C. ;
Amos, C. ;
Henley, M. ;
Kramer, B. .
EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2011, 38 (04) :797-803
[6]   Bronchodilator reversibility in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: use and limitations [J].
Calverley, Peter M. A. ;
Albert, Paul ;
Walker, Paul P. .
LANCET RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2013, 1 (07) :564-573
[7]   SALMETEROL AND FORMOTEROL IN PARTIALLY REVERSIBLE SEVERE CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY-DISEASE - A DOSE-RESPONSE STUDY [J].
CAZZOLA, M ;
MATERA, MG ;
SANTANGELO, G ;
VINCIGUERRA, A ;
ROSSI, F ;
DAMATO, G .
RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 1995, 89 (05) :357-362
[8]   Standards for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with COPD: a summary of the ATS/ERS position paper [J].
Celli, BR ;
MacNee, W ;
Agusti, A ;
Anzueto, A ;
Berg, B ;
Buist, AS ;
Calverley, PMA ;
Chavannes, N ;
Dillard, T ;
Fahy, B ;
Fein, A ;
Heffner, J ;
Lareau, S ;
Meek, P ;
Martinez, F ;
McNicholas, W ;
Muris, J ;
Austegard, E ;
Pauwels, R ;
Rennard, S ;
Rossi, A ;
Siafakas, N ;
Tiep, B ;
Vestbo, J ;
Wouters, E ;
ZuWallack, R .
EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2004, 23 (06) :932-946
[9]   Bronchodilator Reversibility in COPD [J].
Hanania, Nicola A. ;
Celli, Bartolome R. ;
Donohue, James F. ;
Martin, Ubaldo J. .
CHEST, 2011, 140 (04) :1055-1063
[10]   Acute bronchodilator responsiveness and health outcomes in COPD patients in the UPLIFT trial [J].
Hanania, Nicola A. ;
Sharafkhaneh, Amir ;
Celli, Bartolome ;
Decramer, Marc ;
Lystig, Ted ;
Kesten, Steven ;
Tashkin, Donald .
RESPIRATORY RESEARCH, 2011, 12