How sensitive is corporate debt to swings in commodity prices?

被引:11
作者
Donders, Pablo [1 ,2 ]
Jara, Mauricio [2 ]
Wagner, Rodrigo [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Metlife, Agustinas 640, Santiago, Chile
[2] Univ Chile, Sch Econ & Business, Diagonal Paraguay 257, Santiago, Chile
[3] Harvard, Ctr Int Dev, Cambridge, MA USA
关键词
Cost of debt; Fixed-income; Commodity; Downgrading; Stress-tests; CREDIT SPREADS; OIL; OPTIONS; FUTURES; BUILD; TIME; RISK; DETERMINANTS; COST; SPOT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jfs.2017.10.002
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Commodity producing corporations have trillions of dollars in outstanding debt. Thus, the recent fall in commodity prices raised concerns about sustainability and systemic risks. Using a global sample (2003-2015) we measure how corporate bonds react to the underlying commodity price. On average a 10% change in the commodity moves yields-to-maturity by only 15 basis points. This is just a tenth of the sensitivity of stocks returns. Nonetheless, bond sensitivity to commodities is significantly stronger for smaller, leveraged and less profitable firms. Also for short maturity bonds. The type of commodity price change matters too. Sensitivity to price drops is at least five times stronger than to increases. Transitory price changes matter for shorter maturities and leveraged firms. In contrast, longer maturities react more to permanent commodity variations. When firms use hedging derivatives, bonds are less sensitive to all price variations. Hedging mitigates the amplification of commodity shocks, as in Shiller (2008). In conclusion, while debt finance deteriorated with the commodity bust, it hardly dried-up. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 258
页数:22
相关论文
共 67 条
[41]  
Hull John C., 2006, Options, Futures and Other Derivatives
[42]  
IMF, 2015, Global financial stability report: Navigating monetary policy challenges and managing risks
[43]  
IMF, 2016, GLOB FIN STAB REP PO
[44]  
IMF, 2017, GLOB FIN STAB REP GE
[45]   Firm value and hedging: Evidence from US oil and gas producers [J].
Jin, YB ;
Jorion, P .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2006, 61 (02) :893-919
[46]   Time to Build and Fluctuations in Bulk Shipping [J].
Kalouptsidi, Myrto .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2014, 104 (02) :564-608
[47]  
Kinda T., 2016, IMF Working Paper, V16/12
[48]   Revisiting the relationship between spot and futures oil prices: Evidence from quantile cointegrating regression [J].
Lee, Chien-Chiang ;
Zeng, Jhih-Hong .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2011, 33 (05) :924-935
[49]   Asset prices and trading volume under fixed transactions costs [J].
Lo, AW ;
Mamaysky, H ;
Wang, J .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2004, 112 (05) :1054-1090
[50]   TIME TO BUILD, OPTION VALUE, AND INVESTMENT DECISIONS [J].
MAJD, S ;
PINDYCK, RS .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 1987, 18 (01) :7-27