How sensitive is corporate debt to swings in commodity prices?

被引:11
作者
Donders, Pablo [1 ,2 ]
Jara, Mauricio [2 ]
Wagner, Rodrigo [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Metlife, Agustinas 640, Santiago, Chile
[2] Univ Chile, Sch Econ & Business, Diagonal Paraguay 257, Santiago, Chile
[3] Harvard, Ctr Int Dev, Cambridge, MA USA
关键词
Cost of debt; Fixed-income; Commodity; Downgrading; Stress-tests; CREDIT SPREADS; OIL; OPTIONS; FUTURES; BUILD; TIME; RISK; DETERMINANTS; COST; SPOT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jfs.2017.10.002
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Commodity producing corporations have trillions of dollars in outstanding debt. Thus, the recent fall in commodity prices raised concerns about sustainability and systemic risks. Using a global sample (2003-2015) we measure how corporate bonds react to the underlying commodity price. On average a 10% change in the commodity moves yields-to-maturity by only 15 basis points. This is just a tenth of the sensitivity of stocks returns. Nonetheless, bond sensitivity to commodities is significantly stronger for smaller, leveraged and less profitable firms. Also for short maturity bonds. The type of commodity price change matters too. Sensitivity to price drops is at least five times stronger than to increases. Transitory price changes matter for shorter maturities and leveraged firms. In contrast, longer maturities react more to permanent commodity variations. When firms use hedging derivatives, bonds are less sensitive to all price variations. Hedging mitigates the amplification of commodity shocks, as in Shiller (2008). In conclusion, while debt finance deteriorated with the commodity bust, it hardly dried-up. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 258
页数:22
相关论文
共 67 条
[11]   PRICING OF OPTIONS AND CORPORATE LIABILITIES [J].
BLACK, F ;
SCHOLES, M .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1973, 81 (03) :637-654
[12]   Government ownership and the cost of debt: Evidence from government investments in publicly traded firms [J].
Borisova, Ginka ;
Fotak, Veljko ;
Holland, Kateryna ;
Megginson, William L. .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 118 (01) :168-191
[13]  
Brogaard J., 2016, EC IMPACT INDEX
[14]  
Caballero RJ, 1999, HBK ECON, V15, P813
[15]  
Campbell J.Y., 2003, Equity Volatility and Corporate Bond Yields
[16]   Stochastic convenience yield implied from commodity futures and interest rates [J].
Casassus, J ;
Collin-Dufresne, P .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2005, 60 (05) :2283-2331
[17]   Macroeconomic Performance During Commodity Price Booms and Busts [J].
Cespedes, Luis Felipe ;
Velasco, Andres .
IMF ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 60 (04) :570-599
[18]   A Barrel of Oil or a Bottle of Wine: How Do Global Growth Dynamics Affect Commodity Prices? [J].
Cevik, Serhan ;
Sedik, Tahsin Saadi .
JOURNAL OF WINE ECONOMICS, 2014, 9 (01) :34-50
[19]   Corporate hedging and the cost of debt [J].
Chen, Jun ;
King, Tao-Hsien Dolly .
JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2014, 29 :221-245
[20]   Corporate yield spreads and bond liquidity [J].
Chen, Long ;
Lesmond, David A. ;
Wei, Jason .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2007, 62 (01) :119-149