How do types of interaction and phases of self-regulated learning set a stage for collaborative engagement?

被引:139
作者
Jarvela, Sanna [1 ]
Jarvenoja, Hanna [1 ]
Malmberg, Jonna [1 ]
Isohatala, Jaana [1 ]
Sobocinski, Marta [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oulu, FIN-90014 Oulu, Finland
关键词
Engagement; Self-regulated learning; Collaborative learning; Videodata; Cognitive interaction; Socioemotional interaction; SOCIALLY SHARED REGULATION; ACHIEVEMENT; MOTIVATION; ENVIRONMENTS; FRAMEWORK; EMOTIONS; CONTEXTS; BELIEFS;
D O I
10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.01.005
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study investigates how self-regulated learning phases are related to collaborative engagement in two different collaborative task conditions. It integrates SRL theory and the concept of engagement, including interaction in collaboration, as key characteristics of engagement. Forty-four second-year teacher education students worked in groups during a 7-week math didactic course. We collected 84 h of video recordings and coded the group's cognitive and socioemotional interaction and three phases of self-regulation within interaction, including forethought, performance and reflection. After that we analyzed the relationship between the interaction types representing collaborative engagement and SRL phases within two learning tasks. The results show that collaborative engagement did not differ between teacher-led and student-led tasks in terms of the interaction types. However, the results showed that the SRL phases occurred differently within cognitive and socioemotional interaction types when the two task conditions were compared. Findings concerning teacher-led tasks showed invariance in the occurrence of SRL phases across the task and highlighted the relationship between socioemotional interaction and the forethought phase. Additionally, findings concerning the student-led tasks showed systematic changes in the distribution of phases of SRL across sessions in all interaction types. Our results' theoretical and methodological implications for collaborative engagement research are discussed. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 51
页数:13
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
Andriessen J., 2013, Affective Learning Together: social and emotional dimensions of collaborative learning, P205
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, LEARNING HUMANS MACH
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, International Handbook of Collaborative Learning
[4]  
Azevedo R., 2013, INT HDB METACOGNITIO, P427
[5]   Defining and Measuring Engagement and Learning in Science: Conceptual, Theoretical, Methodological, and Analytical Issues [J].
Azevedo, Roger .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 2015, 50 (01) :84-94
[6]   MOTIVATING PROJECT-BASED LEARNING - SUSTAINING THE DOING, SUPPORTING THE LEARNING [J].
BLUMENFELD, PC ;
SOLOWAY, E ;
MARX, RW ;
KRAJCIK, JS ;
GUZDIAL, M ;
PALINCSAR, A .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 1991, 26 (3-4) :369-398
[7]  
Chi M. T. H., 1985, Human abilities, P227
[8]  
Cleary TJ, 2012, HANDBOOK OF RESEARCH ON STUDENT ENGAGEMENT, P237, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_11
[9]  
Cleary TJ, 2011, EDUC PSYCHOL HANDB, P329
[10]   A framework for evaluating and enhancing alignment in self-regulated learning research [J].
Dent, Amy L. ;
Hoyle, Rick H. .
METACOGNITION AND LEARNING, 2015, 10 (01) :165-179