Feasibility of a break-in period of less than 24 hours for urgent start peritoneal dialysis: a multicenter study

被引:9
作者
Wen, Xi [1 ]
Yang, Liming [2 ]
Sun, Zhanshan [3 ]
Zhang, Xiaoxuan [4 ]
Zhu, Xueyan [5 ]
Zhou, Wenhua [1 ]
Hu, Xiaoqing [1 ]
Liu, Shichen [1 ]
Luo, Ping [1 ]
Cui, Wenpeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Second Hosp Jilin Univ, Div Nephrol, 218 Zigiang St, Changchun 130041, Jilin, Peoples R China
[2] First Hosp Jilin Univ, Div Nephrol, Changchun, Peoples R China
[3] Xinganmeng Peoples Hosp, Div Nephrol, Ulan Hot, Peoples R China
[4] Jilin FAW Gen Hosp, Div Nephrol, Changchun, Peoples R China
[5] Jilin City Cent Hosp, Div Nephrol, Jilin, Jilin, Peoples R China
关键词
Urgent start peritoneal dialysis; peritoneal dialysis; break-in period; complications; technique failure; CATHETER PLACEMENT; TERM OUTCOMES; INITIATION; IMPLANTATION; HEMODIALYSIS; ASSOCIATION; FAILURE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1080/0886022X.2022.2049306
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose Urgent start peritoneal dialysis (USPD) is an effective therapeutic method for end-stage renal disease (ESRD). However, whether it is safe to initiate peritoneal dialysis (PD) within 24 h unclear. We examined the short-term outcomes of a break-in period (BI) of 24 h for patients undergoing USPD. Methods This real-world, multicenter, retrospective cohort study evaluated USPD patients from five centers from January 2013 to August 2020. Patients were divided into BI <= 24 h or BI > 24 h groups. The Primary outcomes included incidence of mechanical and infectious complications. The secondary outcome was technique failure. Moreover, we presented a subgroup analysis for patients who did not receive temporary hemodialysis (HD). Results A total of 871 USPD patients were included: 470 in the BI <= 24 h and 401 in the BI > 24 h groups. Mechanical and infectious complications did not differ between the two groups across the follow-up timepoints (2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months) (p > 0.05). Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that BI <= 24 h was not an independent risk factor for mechanical complications, catheter migration, or infectious complications (p > 0.05). A BI <= 24 h was not an independent significant risk factor for technique failure by multivariate Cox regression analysis (p > 0.05). The subgroup analysis of patients who did not receive temporary HD returned the same results. Conclusion Initiating PD within 24 h of catheter insertion was not associated with increased mechanical complications, infectious complications, or technique failures.
引用
收藏
页码:450 / 460
页数:11
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Comparative Study on the Outcomes of Elective-Start versus Urgent-Start Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Placement
    Abdel Aal, Ahmed Kamel
    Mahmoud, Khalid
    Moustafa, Amr Soliman
    Aboueldahab, Noha Alaaeldin
    Souid, Anas
    Gunn, Andrew
    Li, Yufeng
    Wang, Zhixin
    Almehmi, Ammar
    [J]. RADIOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2020, 2020
  • [2] BEST PRACTICES CONSENSUS PROTOCOL FOR PERITONEAL DIALYSIS CATHETER PLACEMENT BY INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGISTS
    Abdel-Aal, Ahmed K.
    Dybbro, Paul
    Hathaway, Peter
    Guest, Steven
    Neuwirth, Michael
    Krishnamurthy, Venkat
    [J]. PERITONEAL DIALYSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 34 (05): : 481 - 493
  • [3] Early failure in patients starting peritoneal dialysis: a competing risks approach
    Bechade, Clemence
    Guittet, Lydia
    Evans, David
    Verger, Christian
    Ryckelynck, Jean-Philippe
    Lobbedez, Thierry
    [J]. NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 29 (11) : 2127 - 2135
  • [4] Comparative Outcomes Between Continuous Ambulatory and Automated Peritoneal Dialysis: A Narrative Review
    Bieber, Scott D.
    Burkart, John
    Golper, Thomas A.
    Teitelbaum, Isaac
    Mehrotra, Rajnish
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2014, 63 (06) : 1027 - 1037
  • [5] Inpatient Hemodialysis Initiation: Reasons, Risk Factors and Outcomes
    Crews, Deidra C.
    Jaar, Bernard G.
    Plantinga, Laura C.
    Kassem, Hania S.
    Fink, Nancy E.
    Powe, Neil R.
    [J]. NEPHRON CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2010, 114 (01): : C19 - C28
  • [6] Technique Failure in Peritoneal Dialysis: Etiologies and Risk Assessment
    Da Luz, Lucas G.
    Ankawi, Ghada
    Digvijay, Kumar
    Rosner, Mitchell H.
    Ronco, Claudio
    [J]. BLOOD PURIFICATION, 2021, 50 (01) : 42 - 49
  • [7] CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR PERITONEAL ACCESS
    Figueiredo, Ana
    Goh, Bak-Leong
    Jenkins, Sarah
    Johnson, David W.
    Mactier, Robert
    Ramalakshmi, Santhanam
    Shrestha, Badri
    Struijk, Dirk
    Wilkie, Martin
    [J]. PERITONEAL DIALYSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 30 (04): : 424 - 429
  • [8] Impact of patient training patterns on peritonitis rates in a large national cohort study
    Figueiredo, Ana Elizabeth
    de Moraes, Thyago Proenca
    Bernardini, Judith
    Poli-de-Figueiredo, Carlos Eduardo
    Barretti, Pasqual
    Olandoski, Marcia
    Pecoits-Filho, Roberto
    [J]. NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 30 (01) : 137 - 142
  • [9] Peritoneal dialysis. catheters: laparoscopic versus traditional placement techniques and outcomes
    Gajar, Aakash H.
    Rhoden, Diane H.
    Kathuria, Pranay
    Kaul, Rajat
    Udupa, A. Deviprakash
    Jennings, William C.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 194 (06) : 872 - 876
  • [10] Chronic kidney disease (CKD) in disadvantaged populations
    Garcia-Garcia, Guillermo
    Jha, Vivekanand
    [J]. CLINICAL KIDNEY JOURNAL, 2015, 8 (01): : 3 - 6