A multi-objective methodology for spacecraft equipment layouts

被引:41
作者
Curty Cuco, Ana Paula [1 ]
de Sousa, Fabiano L. [2 ]
Silva Neto, Antnio J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Inst Nacl Pesquisas Espaciais INPE DMC, BR-1758 Sao Jose Dos Campos, SP, Brazil
[2] Inst Nacl Pesquisas Espaciais INPE DSE, BR-1758 Sao Jose Dos Campos, SP, Brazil
[3] Univ Estado Rio de Janeiro, IPRJ UERJ, Nova Friburgo, RJ, Brazil
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Design optimization; Layout of satellites; Multi-objective optimization; OPTIMIZATION; PLACEMENT; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1007/s11081-014-9252-z
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
One of the main tasks involving the development of a new spacecraft is how to distribute its electronic equipment over its structural panels. This problem is first addressed in the conception phase of the design and is traditionally carried out by a group of system engineers. It is a multidisciplinary task since structural, thermal, dynamics, and integration issues, must all be taken into account simultaneously. Usually, the initial positioning is done based on the engineers' experience, followed by an analysis stage (thermal, structural, etc.) in which the design performance and constraints are verified. This process takes time and hence, as soon as a good feasible design is found, it is taken as the baseline. This precludes a broad exploration of the conceptual design space, which usually leads to a suboptimal layout design. In this paper the main features of a multi-objective methodology are presented which were developed to automatically find solutions for a three-dimensional layout of equipment in spacecraft. It includes mass, inertia, thermal and subsystem requirements and geometric constraints using a multi-objective approach that combines CAD and optimization tools in an integrated environment. As a case study, the methodology was applied to the layout optimization of the Brazilian Multi-Mission Space Platform (MMP) equipment. The main results are presented.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 181
页数:17
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], P 5 INT C INV PROBL
[2]  
Baier H, 2003, P 54 INT ASTR C BERM
[3]   Evolutionary multi-objective optimization: A historical view of the field [J].
Coello Coello, Carlos A. .
IEEE COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE MAGAZINE, 2006, 1 (01) :28-36
[4]  
Cuco APC, 2011, THESIS POSTGRADUATE
[5]  
De Sousa FL, 2007, P 19 INT C MECH ENG
[6]   A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II [J].
Deb, K ;
Pratap, A ;
Agarwal, S ;
Meyarivan, T .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2002, 6 (02) :182-197
[7]  
Ferebee M.J., 1987, NASA Technical Memorandum 89051
[8]   OPTIMIZATION OF PAYLOAD PLACEMENT ON ARBITRARY SPACECRAFT [J].
FEREBEE, MJ ;
ALLEN, CL .
JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, 1991, 28 (05) :612-614
[9]   Optimal Placement of Electronic Components to Minimize Heat Flux Nonuniformities [J].
Hengeveld, Derek W. ;
Braun, James E. ;
Groll, Eckhard A. ;
Williams, Andrew D. .
JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, 2011, 48 (04) :556-563
[10]   Large-Scale Multidisciplinary Optimization of a Small Satellite's Design and Operation [J].
Hwang, John T. ;
Lee, Dae Young ;
Cutler, James W. ;
Martins, Joaquim R. R. A. .
JOURNAL OF SPACECRAFT AND ROCKETS, 2014, 51 (05) :1648-1663