Why do regions develop and change? The challenge for geography and economics

被引：101

作者：

Storper, Michael ^{[1
,2
,3
]}

机构：

[1] London Sch Econ, Dept Geog & Environm, London WC2A 2AE, England

[2] Inst Etud Polit Paris Sci Po, F-75007 Paris, France

[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Publ Affairs, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA

来源：

JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY | 2011年 / 11卷 / 02期

关键词：

regional growth; urban growth; metropolitan growth; regional development; urban systems; R11; R12; R23; GROWTH; TRADE; AGGLOMERATION;

D O I：

10.1093/jeg/lbq033

中图分类号：

F [经济];

学科分类号：

02 ;

摘要：

Explaining the growth and change of regions and cities is one of the great challenges for social science. The field of economic geography and associated economics has developed frameworks in recent years that, while tackling major questions in spatial economic development, are deficient in their ability to explain geographical develop in a causal way, and to incorporate principal forces for change.

引用

页码：333 / 346

页数：14

共 34 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 2001, Special Interest Politics

[2]

[Anonymous], EC GEOGRAPHY

[3]

[Anonymous], 2004, Handbook of urban and regional economics

[4] A theory of urban growth [J].

Black, D ;

Henderson, V .

JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1999, 107 (02) :252-284

[5] Editorial: Constructing an evolutionary economic geography [J].

Boschma, Ron ;

Martin, Ron .

JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY, 2007, 7 (05) :537-548

[6] Why is economic geography not an evolutionary science? Towards an evolutionary economic geography [J].

Boschma, Ron A. ;

Frenken, Koen .

JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY, 2006, 6 (03) :273-302

[7]

Chinitz B., 1961, AM ECON REV, V51, P279, DOI DOI 10.1080/00420988020080651

[8]

DURANTON G, 2005, J ECON GEOGR, V5, P545

[9]

Duranton G., 2004, Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, V4, P2063, DOI 10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80005-1

[10] Rising trade costs? Agglomeration and trade with endogenous transaction costs [J].

Duranton, Gilles ;

Storper, Michael .

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE, 2008, 41 (01) :292-319

← 1 2 3 4 →