Treatment delays in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST elevation myocardial infarction at the Quebec Heart and Lung Institute

被引:15
作者
Garceau, Patrick [1 ]
Dery, Jean-Pierre [1 ]
Lachance, Philippe [1 ]
Grenier, Stfanie [1 ]
Rodes-Cabau, Josep [1 ]
Barbeau, Gerald [1 ]
Bertrand, Olivier F. [1 ]
Gleeton, Onil [1 ]
Larose, Eric [1 ]
Nguyen, Can Man [1 ]
Noel, Bernard [1 ]
Proulx, Guy [1 ]
Roy, Louis [1 ]
de Larochelliere, Robert [1 ]
机构
[1] Laval Hosp, Quebec Heart & Lung Inst, Ste Foy, PQ, Canada
关键词
acute coronary syndromes; angioplasty; myocardial infarction; stent;
D O I
10.1016/S0828-282X(07)71011-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Current guidelines for ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) recommend performing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within 90 min of hospital arrival. However, recent data suggest that in a real-world setting, median door-to-balloon (DTB) time is closer to 180 min for transfer patients, with less than 5% of patients being treated within 90 inin. A retrospective observational study was conducted to assess time to treatment in patients undergoing primary PCI at the Quebec Heart and Lung Institute (QHLI). METHODS: Consecutive lytic-eligible patients undergoing primary PCI at the QHLI for STEMI between April 2004 and March 2005 were included in the present analysis. The primary evaluation was DTB time measured from arrival at the first hospital to first balloon inflation. Clinical outcomes were in-hospital death, reinfarction and bleeding. DTB times and hospital outcomes of patients transferred from referring hospitals were compared with those of patients presenting directly to the QHLI. RESULTS: During the study period, 203 lytic-eligible patients were treated with primary PCI. Sixty-nine patients presented directly to the QHLI and 134 were transferred from other hospitals. Six transfer patients were excluded because of missing time variables. The median DTB time was 114 min in transfer patients, compared with 87 min in patients presenting directly to the QHLI (P<0.001). DTB time was less than 90 min in 24% of the transfer population compared with 55% of patients presenting directly to the QHLI (P<0.001). In patients refer-red from hospitals within a radius of 30 km from the QHLI (n= 100), median DTB time was 106 min with 30% receiving PCI within 90 min. In these patients, estimated PCI-related delay was 74 min. For patients presenting to hospitals beyond 30 kin (n=28), median DTB time was 142 min with 4% receiving reperfusion within 90 min. In these patients, estimated PCI-related delay was I 10 min. Median DTB time for patients presenting during off hours at the QHLI was 92 min compared with 79 min for patients presenting during regular business hours (P=0.02). In patients transferred from other hospitals, median DTB time was 118 min during off hours and 108 min during normal business hours (P=0.07). CONCLUSIONS: A DTB time of less than 90 min can be achieved in the majority of patients presenting directly to a primary PCI centre. However, for patients presenting to community hospitals, transfer for primary PCI is often associated with delayed revascularization. The present study highlights the need for careful patient selection when deciding between on-site thrombolytic therapy and transfer for primary PCI for STEMI patients presenting to hospitals without PCI facilities.
引用
收藏
页码:53B / 57B
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] A comparison of coronary angioplasty with fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction
    Andersen, HR
    Nielsen, TT
    Rasmussen, K
    Thuesen, L
    Kelbaek, H
    Thayssen, P
    Abildgaard, U
    Pedersen, F
    Madsen, JK
    Grande, P
    Villadsen, AB
    Krusell, LR
    Haghfelt, T
    Lomholt, P
    Husted, SE
    Vigholt, E
    Kjaergard, HK
    Mortensen, LS
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 349 (08) : 733 - 742
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2005, Circulation
  • [4] Antman Elliott M., 2004, J Am Coll Cardiol, V44, pE1, DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.07.014
  • [5] Armstrong PW, 2004, CAN J CARDIOL, V20, P1075
  • [6] Implementation of reperfusion therapy in acute myocardial infarction. A policy statement from the European Society of Cardiology
    Bassand, JP
    Danchin, N
    Filippatos, G
    Gitt, A
    Hamm, C
    Silber, S
    Tubaro, M
    Weidinger, F
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2005, 26 (24) : 2733 - 2741
  • [7] Comparison of mortality rates in acute myocardial infarction treated by percutaneous coronary intervention versus fibrinolysis
    Betriu, A
    Masotti, M
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 95 (01) : 100 - 101
  • [8] Transfer for primary angioplasty versus immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction - A meta-analysis
    Dalby, M
    Bouzamondo, A
    Lechat, P
    Montalescot, G
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2003, 108 (15) : 1809 - 1814
  • [9] Delays to reperfusion therapy in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: results from the AMI-QUEBEC Study
    Huynh, Thao
    O'Loughlin, Jennifer
    Joseph, Lawrence
    Schampaert, Erick
    Rinfret, Stephane
    Afilalo, Marc
    Kouz, Simon
    Cantin, Bernard
    Nguyen, Michel
    Eisenberg, Mark J.
    [J]. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2006, 175 (12) : 1527 - 1532
  • [10] Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials
    Keeley, EC
    Boura, JA
    Grines, CL
    [J]. LANCET, 2003, 361 (9351) : 13 - 20