Ownership structure and political spending disclosure

被引:15
作者
Ali, Hesham [1 ,2 ]
Adegbite, Emmanuel [1 ,3 ]
Tam Huy Nguyen [1 ]
机构
[1] Nottingham Univ Business Sch, Nottingham, England
[2] Mansoura Univ, Fac Commerce, Mansoura, Egypt
[3] James Cook Univ, Accounting Dept, Singapore, Singapore
关键词
Political spending disclosure; corporate governance; ownership structure; voluntary disclosure; political transparency; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; RISK DISCLOSURES; INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS; EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS; AGENCY COSTS; GOVERNANCE; VOLUNTARY; QUALITY; SHAREHOLDER; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1080/01559982.2021.1929006
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study examines the link between ownership structure and political spending disclosure (PSD). We break down ownership into four different groups of shareholders: institutional, insider, governmental and foreign. Using a unique dataset provided by CPA-Zicklin for PSD and a panel dataset from S&P 500 companies between 2015 and 2018, our results reveal that institutional and governmental ownership are positively associated with the level of PSD, while insider ownership is negatively associated with the level of PSD. Additionally, while prior literature mainly investigated how ownership structure influences disclosure practices, we analyse the mechanisms through which ownership characteristics influence PSD. Our cross-sectional tests provide evidence that insider owners exhibit more PSD if they are pursing tax-related lobbying expenses and tax avoidance practices. Additionally, governmental owners demand lower PSD in firms with higher nonfinancial and financial reporting quality. Finally, institutional owners demand more PSD in the case of lower industry concentration. Overall, we conclude that different owners have distinct impacts and preferences on a firm's politic& strategy and various mechanisms uniquely operationalise the interactions between different owners and political transparency. Through agency theory, our results advance heated debates on PSD - an emerging, yet hitherto less examined, category of voluntary disclosure.
引用
收藏
页码:160 / 190
页数:31
相关论文
共 119 条
[1]  
Adegbite E., 2010, THESIS U LONDON
[2]   Financial and corporate social performance in the UK listed firms: the relevance of non-linearity and lag effects [J].
Adegbite, Emmanuel ;
Guney, Yilmaz ;
Kwabi, Frank ;
Tahir, Suleiman .
REVIEW OF QUANTITATIVE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING, 2019, 52 (01) :105-158
[3]   The Politics of Shareholder Activism in Nigeria [J].
Adegbite, Emmanuel ;
Amaeshi, Kenneth ;
Amao, Olufemi .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2012, 105 (03) :389-402
[4]  
Aggarwal RK, 2012, BUS POLIT, V14
[5]   The association between outside directors, institutional investors and the properties of management earnings forecasts [J].
Ajinkya, B ;
Bhojraj, S ;
Sengupta, P .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2005, 43 (03) :343-376
[6]   Ownership structure and audit quality: An empirical analysis considering ownership types in Jordan [J].
Alhababsah, Salem .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING AUDITING AND TAXATION, 2019, 35 :71-84
[7]   Industry concentration and corporate disclosure policy [J].
Ali, Ashiq ;
Klasa, Sandy ;
Yeung, Eric .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING & ECONOMICS, 2014, 58 (2-3) :240-264
[8]   Voluntary disclosure, ownership structure, and corporate debt maturity: A study of French listed firms [J].
Allaya, Manel ;
Derouiche, Imen ;
Muessig, Anke .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2022, 81
[9]   Ownership types, corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosures Empirical evidence from a developing country [J].
Alshbili, Ibrahem ;
Elamer, Ahmed A. ;
Beddewela, Eshani .
ACCOUNTING RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2020, 33 (01) :148-166
[10]   The value of local political connections in a low-corruption environment [J].
Amore, Mario Daniele ;
Bennedsen, Morten .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 110 (02) :387-402