Impact of fitting dominance and additive effects on accuracy of genomic prediction of breeding values in layers

被引:25
|
作者
Heidaritabar, M. [1 ,2 ]
Wolc, A. [1 ,3 ]
Arango, J. [3 ]
Zeng, J. [1 ]
Settar, P. [3 ]
Fulton, J. E. [3 ]
O'Sullivan, N. P. [3 ]
Bastiaansen, J. W. M. [2 ]
Fernando, R. L. [1 ]
Garrick, D. J. [1 ]
Dekkers, J. C. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Ames, IA USA
[2] Wageningen Univ, Anim Breeding & Genom Ctr, POB 338, NL-6700 AH Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Hy Line Int, Dallas Ctr, TX USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Additive effect; dominance effect; genomic selection; layer; SELECTION; VARIANCE; HERITABILITY; MODELS;
D O I
10.1111/jbg.12225
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Most genomic prediction studies fit only additive effects in models to estimate genomic breeding values (GEBV). However, if dominance genetic effects are an important source of variation for complex traits, accounting for them may improve the accuracy of GEBV. We investigated the effect of fitting dominance and additive effects on the accuracy of GEBV for eight egg production and quality traits in a purebred line of brown layers using pedigree or genomic information (42K single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panel). Phenotypes were corrected for the effect of hatch date. Additive and dominance genetic variances were estimated using genomic-based [genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP)-REML and BayesC] and pedigree-based (PBLUP-REML) methods. Breeding values were predicted using a model that included both additive and dominance effects and a model that included only additive effects. The reference population consisted of approximately 1800 animals hatched between 2004 and 2009, while approximately 300 young animals hatched in 2010 were used for validation. Accuracy of prediction was computed as the correlation between phenotypes and estimated breeding values of the validation animals divided by the square root of the estimate of heritability in the whole population. The proportion of dominance variance to total phenotypic variance ranged from 0.03 to 0.22 with PBLUP-REML across traits, from 0 to 0.03 with GBLUP-REML and from 0.01 to 0.05 with BayesC. Accuracies of GEBV ranged from 0.28 to 0.60 across traits. Inclusion of dominance effects did not improve the accuracy of GEBV, and differences in their accuracies between genomic-based methods were small (0.01-0.05), with GBLUP-REML yielding higher prediction accuracies than BayesC for egg production, egg colour and yolk weight, while BayesC yielded higher accuracies than GBLUP-REML for the other traits. In conclusion, fitting dominance effects did not impact accuracy of genomic prediction of breeding values in this population.
引用
收藏
页码:334 / 346
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Genomic Prediction of Additive and Dominant Effects on Wool and Blood Traits in Alpine Merino Sheep
    Zhu, Shaohua
    Zhao, Hongchang
    Han, Mei
    Yuan, Chao
    Guo, Tingting
    Liu, Jianbin
    Yue, Yaojing
    Qiao, Guoyan
    Wang, Tianxiang
    Li, Fanwen
    Gun, Shuangbao
    Yang, Bohui
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2020, 7
  • [42] Persistency of accuracy of genomic breeding values for different simulated pig breeding programs in developing countries
    Akanno, E. C.
    Schenkel, F. S.
    Sargolzaei, M.
    Friendship, R. M.
    Robinson, J. A. B.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2014, 131 (05) : 367 - 378
  • [43] Genomic Prediction of Additive and Non-additive Effects Using Genetic Markers and Pedigrees
    de Almeida Filho, Janeo Eustaquio
    Rodrigues Guimaraes, Joao Filipi
    Fonsceca e Silva, Fabyano
    Vilela de Resende, Marcos Deon
    Munoz, Patricio
    Kirst, Matias
    Ribeiro de Resende Junior, Marcio Fernando
    G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS, 2019, 9 (08): : 2739 - 2748
  • [44] Impact of depth of pedigree and inclusion of historical data on the estimation of additive variance and breeding values in a sugarcane breeding program
    Atkin, Felicity Claire
    Dieters, Mark J.
    Stringer, Joanne K.
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 2009, 119 (03) : 555 - 565
  • [45] Mixed Model Methods for Genomic Prediction and Variance Component Estimation of Additive and Dominance Effects Using SNP Markers
    Da, Yang
    Wang, Chunkao
    Wang, Shengwen
    Hu, Guo
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (01):
  • [46] Prediction of genomic breeding values of milk traits in Brazilian Saanen goats
    de Sousa, Diego Rodrigues
    do Nascimento, Andre Vieira
    Lobo, Raimundo Nonato Braga
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BREEDING AND GENETICS, 2021, 138 (05) : 541 - 551
  • [47] Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations
    Hayes, Ben J.
    Bowman, Phillip J.
    Chamberlain, Amanda C.
    Verbyla, Klara
    Goddard, Mike E.
    GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2009, 41
  • [48] Improvement of genomic prediction in advanced wheat breeding lines by including additive-by-additive epistasis
    Raffo, Miguel Angel
    Sarup, Pernille
    Guo, Xiangyu
    Liu, Huiming
    Andersen, Jeppe Reitan
    Orabi, Jihad
    Jahoor, Ahmed
    Jensen, Just
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 2022, 135 (03) : 965 - 978
  • [49] Accuracy of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in crossbred beef cattle
    Mujibi, F. D. N.
    Nkrumah, J. D.
    Durunna, O. N.
    Stothard, P.
    Mah, J.
    Wang, Z.
    Basarab, J.
    Plastow, G.
    Crews, D. H., Jr.
    Moore, S. S.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2011, 89 (11) : 3353 - 3361
  • [50] Persistence of accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values over generations in layer chickens
    Anna Wolc
    Jesus Arango
    Petek Settar
    Janet E Fulton
    Neil P O'Sullivan
    Rudolf Preisinger
    David Habier
    Rohan Fernando
    Dorian J Garrick
    Jack CM Dekkers
    Genetics Selection Evolution, 43